[1] CORDARO M, DONNO S, AUSENDA F, et al. Influence of bone anatomy on implant placement procedures in edentulous arches of elderly individuals: a cross-sectional study on computed tomography images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(5):995-1004.
[2] MALÓ P, RANGERT B, NOBRE M. “All-on-Four” immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2-9.
[3] CHAN MH, NUDELL YA. All-on-4 Concept Update. Dent Clin North Am. 2021;65(1):211-227.
[4] DO TA, LE HS, SHEN YW, et al. Risk factors related to late failure of dental implant-a systematic review of recent studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3931.
[5] MARCIÁN P, WOLFF J, HORÁČKOVÁ L, et al. Micro finite element analysis of dental implants under different loading conditions. Comput Biol Med. 2018;96:157-165.
[6] NIMBALKAR S, DHATRAK P, GHERDE C, et al. A review article on factors affecting bone loss in dental implants. Mater Today Proc. 2020;43(2):970-976.
[7] SILVA GAF, FAOT F, POSSEBON APDR, et al. Effect of macrogeometry and bone type on insertion torque, primary stability, surface topography damage and titanium release of dental implants during surgical insertion into artificial bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;119:104515.
[8] JAVED F, AHMED HB, CRESPI R, et al. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013;5(4):162-167.
[9] JUNG RE, AL-NAWAS B, ARAUJO M, et al. Group 1 ITI consensus report: the influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 16:69-77.
[10] KLEIN MO, SCHIEGNITZ E, AL-NAWAS B. Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl 1:43-54.
[11] SCHIEGNITZ E, AL-NAWAS B. Narrow-diameter implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 16:21-40.
[12] GONZÁLEZ-VALLS G, ROCA-MILLAN E, CÉSPEDES-SÁNCHEZ JM, et al. Narrow diameter dental implants as an alternative treatment for atrophic alveolar ridges. systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(12):3234.
[13] SONG SY, LEE JY, SHIN SW. Effect of implant diameter on fatigue strength. Implant Dent. 2017; 26(1):59-65.
[14] VALERA-JIMÉNEZ JF, BURGUEÑO-BARRIS G, GÓMEZ-GONZÁLEZ S, et al. Finite element analysis of narrow dental implants. Dent Mater. 2020;36(7):927-935.
[15] MOREIRA DE MELO EJ JR, FRANCISCHONE CE. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(4):477-484.
[16] CENKOGLU BG, BALCIOGLU NB, OZDEMIR T, et al. The effect of the length and distribution of implants for fixed prosthetic reconstructions in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a finite element analysis. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(16):2556.
[17] 姚立敏,王娟,童昕.比较All-on-4种植修复中倾斜种植体与轴向种植体临床效果的5年回顾性研究[J].口腔医学,2021,41(3):242-246,283.
[18] SZABÓ ÁL, NAGY ÁL, LÁSZLÓFY C, et al. Distally tilted implants according to the all-on-four® treatment concept for the rehabilitation of complete edentulism: a 3.5-year retrospective radiographic study of clinical outcomes and marginal bone level changes. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10(5):82.
[19] BRUM JR, MACEDO FR, OLIVEIRA MB, et al. Assessment of the stresses produced on the bone implant/tissue interface to the different insertion angulations of the implant - a three-dimensional analysis by the finite elements method. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(10):e930-e937.
[20] MALÓ P, RANGERT B, NOBRE M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S88-S94.
[21] KUMARI A, MALHOTRA P, PHOGAT S, et al. A finite element analysis to study the stress distribution on distal implants in an all-on-four situation in atrophic maxilla as affected by the tilt of the implants and varying cantilever lengths. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(4):409-416.
[22] GÜMRÜKÇÜ Z, KORKMAZ YT. Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018;56(6):979-989.
[23] LIU T, MU Z, YU T, et al. Biomechanical comparison of implant inclinations and load times with the all-on-4 treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2019;22(6):585-594.
[24] DRAGO C, HOWELL K. Concepts for designing and fabricating metal implant frameworks for hybrid implant prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(5):413-424.
[25] HÄMMERLE CHF,CORDARO L, ALCCAYHUAMAN KAA, et al. Biomechanical aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 4. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 18:326-331.
[26] MALÓ P, DE ARAÚJO NOBRE M, LOPES A, et al. The All-on-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae: a longitudinal study with 5-13 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(4):538-549.
[27] GRANDI T, SIGNORINI L. Rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible by all-on-four treatment concept: a retrospective cohort study with up to 10 years follow-up. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;58(1):10.
[28] HORITA S, SUGIURA T, YAMAMOTO K, et al. Biomechanical analysis of immediately loaded implants according to the “All-on-Four” concept. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(2):123-132.
[29] WU AY, HSU JT, FUH LJ, et al. Biomechanical effect of implant design on four implants supporting mandibular full-arch fixed dentures: in vitro test and finite element analysis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(10):1514-1523.
[30] SHETTY R, SINGH I, SUMAYLI HA, et al. Effect of prosthetic framework material, cantilever length and opposing arch on peri-implant strain in an all-on-four implant prostheses. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(6):866-873.
[31] GREENSTEIN G, CAVALLARO JJR. Cantilevers extending from unilateral implant-supported fixed prostheses: a review of the literature and presentation of practical guidelines. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(10):1221-1230.
[32] DRAGO C. Ratios of cantilever lengths and anterior-posterior spreads of definitive hybrid full-arch, screw-retained prostheses: results of a clinical study. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(5):402-408.
[33] SALEH SABER F, GHASEMI S, KOODARYAN R, et al. The comparison of stress distribution with different implant numbers and inclination angles in all-on-four and conventional methods in maxilla: a finite element analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015;9(4):246-253.
[34] AL-RABAB’AH M, HAMADNEH W, ALSALEM I, et al. Use of high performance polymers as dental implant abutments and frameworks: a case series report. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(4):365-372.
[35] KEWEKORDES T, WILLE S, KERN M. Wear of polyetherketoneketones - Influence of titanium dioxide content and antagonistic material. Dent Mater. 2018;34(3):560-567.
[36] TRIBST JPM, DE MORAIS DC, ALONSO AA, et al. Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017;17(3):255-260.
[37] BHERING CL, MESQUITA MF, KEMMOKU DT, et al. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a prototyping guided 3D-FEA study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;69:715-725.
[38] MALÓ P, DE ARAÚJO NOBRE M, MOURA GUEDES C, et al. Short-term report of an ongoing prospective cohort study evaluating the outcome of full-arch implant-supported fixed hybrid polyetheretherketone-acrylic resin prostheses and the All-on-Four concept. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(5):692-702.
[39] DAYAN SC, GECKILI O. The influence of framework material on stress distribution in maxillary complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by four dental implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2021;24(14):1606-1617.
[40] VILLEFORT RF, TRIBST JPM, DAL PIVA AMO, et al. Stress distribution on different bar materials in implant-retained palatal obturator. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0241589.
[41] HAROUN F, OZAN O. Evaluation of Stresses on implant, bone, and restorative materials caused by different opposing arch materials in hybrid prosthetic restorations using the all-on-4 technique. Mat(Basel). 2021;14(15):4308.
[42] TRIBST JPM, CAMPANELLI DE MORAIS D, MELO DE MATOS JD, et al. Influence of framework material and posterior implant angulation in full-arch all-on-4 implant-supported prosthesis stress concentration. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10(1):12.
[43] KELKAR KC, BHAT V, HEGDE C. Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone-implant interface in the all-on-four implant system. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021;18:1.
[44] PAULO M, MIGUEL NAD, ARMANDO L. An overview of the All-on-4™ implant philosophy. Fac Dent J. 2012;3(1):20-27.
[45] JENSEN OT. Complete arch site classification for all-on-4 immediate function. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4):741-751.e2.
[46] JENSEN OT, ADAMS MW. The maxillary M-4: a technical and biomechanical note for all-on-4 management of severe maxillary atrophy--report of 3 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(8):1739-1744.
[47] JENSEN OT, ADAMS MW, BUTURA C, et al. Maxillary V-4: Four implant treatment for maxillary atrophy with dental implants fixed apically at the vomer-nasal crest, lateral pyriform rim, and zygoma for immediate function. Report on 44 patients followed from 1 to 3 years. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(6):810-817.
[48] AYALI A, ALTAGAR M, OZAN O, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the All-on-4, M-4, and V-4 techniques in an atrophic maxilla: a 3D finite element analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2020; 123:103880.
[49] JENSEN TO, ADAMS WM, COTTAM RJ, et al. The All-on-4 shelf: maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010,68(10):2520-2527.
[50] MORASCHINI V, MOURÃO CFAB, MONTEMEZZI P, et al. Clinical comparation of extra-short (4 mm) and long (>8 mm) dental implants placed in mandibular bone: a systematic review and metanalysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(3):315.
[51] XU X, HUANG J, FU X, et al. Short implants versus longer implants in the posterior alveolar region after an observation period of at least five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2020;100:103386.
[52] BARIKANI H, RASHTAK S, AKBARI S, et al. The effect of shape, length and diameter of implants on primary stability based on resonance frequency analysis. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014;11(1):87-91.
[53] HIMMLOVÁ L, DOSTÁLOVÁ T, KÁCOVSKÝ A, et al. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(1):20-25.
[54] 木志翔,刘婷,陈陶,等.两种上颌无牙颌种植固定修复方案的有限元分析[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(10):931-935.
[55] BOZYEL D, TAŞAR FARUK S. Biomechanical behavior of All-on-4 and M-4 configurations in an atrophic maxilla: a 3D finite element method. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e929908.
[56] TARUNA M, CHITTARANJAN B, SUDHEER N, et al. Prosthodontic perspective to all-on-4® concept for dental implants. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(10):ZE16-ZE19.
[57] STOICHKOV B, KIROV D. Analysis of the causes of dental implant fracture: a retrospective clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2018;49(4):279-286.
[58] 庞丽娇,杨海萍,胡婷姿,等.All-on-4种植固定修复的咬合设计[J].口腔医学,2021,41(8):765-768.
[59] 马斐斐,林野,邸萍,等.T-ScanⅢ咬合分析系统测量无牙颌All-on-4种植修复后力分布初探[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2016,51(9):517-520.
[60] ABDUO J, TENNANT M. Impact of lateral occlusion schemes: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(2):193-204.
[61] 张雪洋,黄雁红,陈沛,等.无牙颌种植义齿的咬合设计[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2018,36(1):1-3.
[62] MIRALLES R. Canine-guide occlusion and group function occlusion are equally acceptable when restoring the dentition. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2016;16(1):41-43.
[63] TÜRKER N, BÜYÜKKAPLAN US, SADOWSKY SJ, et al. Finite element stress analysis of applied forces to implants and supporting tissues using the “All-on-Four” concept with different occlusal schemes. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):185-194.
[64] TÜRKER N, ALKIŞ HT, SADOWSKY SJ, et al. Effects of occlusal scheme on all-on-four abutments, screws, and prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Oral Implantol. 2021;47(1):18-24.
[65] KAYABAŞI O, YÜZBASIOĞLU E, ERZINCANLI F. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Adv Eng Soft. 2006;37(10):649-658. |