中国组织工程研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 413-417.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.03.020

• 膜生物材料 membrane biomaterials • 上一篇    下一篇

不同血液透析膜材料治疗重度胰腺炎的应用价值

曾庆松,李 进,朱海超,徐艳琴,朱 琳   

  • 收稿日期:2015-12-14 出版日期:2016-01-15 发布日期:2016-01-15
  • 作者简介:曾庆松,男,1979年生,河南省南阳市人,汉族,主治医师,主要从事消化内科研究。

Different hemodialysis membranes for the treatment of severe pancreatitis

Zeng Qing-song, Li Jin, Zhu Hai-chao, Xu Yan-qin, Zhu Lin   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College, Nanyang 473000, Henan Province, China
  • Received:2015-12-14 Online:2016-01-15 Published:2016-01-15
  • About author:Zeng Qing-song, Attending physician, Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College, Nanyang 473000, Henan Province, China

摘要:

文章快速阅读:

文题释义:

血液透析:是急慢性肾功能衰竭患者肾脏替代治疗方式之一。它通过将体内血液引流至体外,经一个由无数根空心纤维组成的透析器中,血液与含机体浓度相似的电解质溶液(透析液)在一根根空心纤维内外,通过弥散/对流进行物质交换,清除体内的代谢废物、维持电解质和酸碱平衡;同时清除体内过多的水分,并将经过净化的血液回输的整个过程称为血液透析。
透析膜:一种以浓度差为推动力的分离膜。根据分离的溶质的粒径,要求渗析膜上有相适应的孔径均匀的微孔。膜孔径在1 μm以下的有机高聚物的均质膜,是一类不带电荷的多孔膜,目前主要用于人工肾的纤维素渗析膜。常用的制备材料有铜氨法再生纤维素、醋酸纤维素、聚丙烯腈、乙烯-乙烯醇共聚物以及聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯、聚砜、聚丙烯酰胺等。

 

背景:对重度胰腺炎患者进行血液透析治疗,可有效清除各种有毒物质,但不同透析膜材料的清除效果是否存在差异?
目的:探讨重度胰腺炎患者临床治疗中血液透析膜材料的临床应用价值。
方法:纳入重度胰腺炎患者67例,其中男38例,女29例,年龄34-81岁,均在发病72 h内接受连续性床旁血液透析,其中32例选择聚砜膜透析膜材料,35例选择醋酸纤维素膜透析膜材料,透析5 h/次,每周3次,两组均稳定透析3周。3周后,观察两组血淀粉酶、白细胞计数恢复至正常水平的时间,治疗有效率,肝肾临床指标及炎性因子水平变化。

结果与结论:聚砜膜组与醋酸纤维素膜组间血淀粉酶、白细胞计数恢复至正常水平的时间,不良反应发生情况及治疗有效率无差异。两组治疗后的急性生理功能和慢性健康评分、血肌酐、三酰甘油、血液淀粉酶、谷丙转氨酶、白细胞介素6、C-反应蛋白及肿瘤坏死因子α水平均较治疗前明显降低(P < 0.05),血O2压力较治疗前明显升高(P < 0.05),但两组间上述指标比较差异均无显著性意义,表明聚砜膜和醋酸纤维素膜的透析效果相当,均可有效清除体内有害毒素。 

 

ORCID: 0000-0003-2114-5420(曾庆松)

关键词: 生物材料, 膜生物材料, 透析膜材料, 重度胰腺炎, 血液透析, 治疗效果, 炎性因子, 应用价值

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The hemodialysis treatment for severe pancreatitis patients can effectively remove all kinds of toxic substances, but it is unclear whether there are differences in the removal effects of different dialysis membrane materials.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical application value of hemodialysis membrane materials in the treatment of severe pancreatitis.
METHODS: Totally 67 patients with severe pancreatitis were enrolled, including 38 males and 29 females, aged 34-81 years, and all underwent continuous bedside hemodialysis within 72 hours of onset. Among them, 32 patients selected polysulfone membrane, and the other 35 patients selected cellulose acetate membrane. Dialysis was done 5 hours once, three times a week. All the patients in these two groups were subjected to stable dialysis for 3 weeks. After 3 weeks, the recovery time required for the levels of serum amylase and white blood cell count in the two groups, treatment efficiency, liver and kidney clinical indicators and levels of inflammatory cytokines were observed and detected.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the recovery time required for serum amylase and white blood cell count, the incidence of adverse reactions and the effective rate of treatment between polysulfone membrane and cellulose acetate membrane groups. The acute physiology and chronic health scores, the levels of serum creatinine, triglycerides, blood amylase, alanine aminotransferase, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-α after treatment in these two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P < 0.05). The blood O2 pressure was significantly higher than that before treatment (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in the above indicators between these two groups. These results demonstrate that the dialysis effects of polysulfone and cellulose acetate membranes are equivalent, both of which can effectively remove the harmful toxins in the body.