中国组织工程研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (12): 1889-1894.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.12.014

• 组织工程口腔材料 tissue-engineered oral materials • 上一篇    下一篇

牙本质比色对铸瓷修复体临床精确选色的意义

朴国滨1,赵冰松2,石旭旭1   

  1. 1大庆油田总医院口腔修复科,黑龙江省大庆市  163001
    2佳木斯大学,黑龙江省佳木斯市  154000
  • 修回日期:2014-01-07 出版日期:2014-03-19 发布日期:2014-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 赵冰松,佳木斯大学研究生学院在读硕士,佳木斯大学,黑龙江省佳木斯市 154000
  • 作者简介:朴国滨,男,1977年生,黑龙江省大庆市人,朝鲜族,2005年佳木斯大学口腔医学院毕业,硕士,主治医师,主要从事于牙周美学修复研究。

Colorimetric evaluation of dentin is significant for accurate color selection in cast ceramic prostheses

Piao Guo-bin1, Zhao Bing-song2, Shi Xu-xu1   

  1. 1Department of Prosthodontics, Daqing General Hospital Group Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing 163001, Heilongjiang Province, China
    2Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154000, Heilongjiang Province, China
  • Revised:2014-01-07 Online:2014-03-19 Published:2014-03-19
  • Contact: Zhao Bing-song, Studying for master’s degree, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154000, Heilongjiang Province, China
  • About author:Piao Guo-bin, Master, Attending physician, Department of Prosthodontics, Daqing General Hospital Group Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing 163001, Heilongjiang Province, China

摘要:

背景:VITA 3D Master比色板是近年来新推出的新型比色系统,具有广泛的应用前景。
目的:评价牙本质比色对铸瓷修复体临床精确比色的意义。
方法:分别使用常规比色法和常规比色法联合牙本质比色法(联合比色法)为30例患者的患牙颈1/3 、中1/3、 切1/3进行比色。在CIE1976L*a*b*色度系统下,用单反数码相机(Canon D50)对2种比色方法制作的铸瓷修复体与同名牙进行色度值测定和分析。并对各种新型比色方法进行举例分析。
结果与结论:常规比色法制作的修复体△L*为1.22±0.16,△C*为1.19±0.20,△H*为0.31±0.05,△E*为1.32±0.13;联合比色法制作的修复体△L*为1.03±0.11,△C*为1.12±0.19,△H*为0.29±0.03,△E*为1.23±0.11。常规比色法制作的修复体满意22例,联合比色法制作的修复体满意23例。患者对2组修复体色彩还原效果满意度差异无显著性学意义(P > 0.05),2组修复体色差分析有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。


中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:生物材料;骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性;组织工程


全文链接:

关键词: 生物材料, 口腔生物材料, 牙本质, 比色, 修复体, 铸瓷, VITA 3D Master比色板, Shade-Eye NCC电脑比色仪, Easyshade电脑比色仪, Crystaleye电脑比色仪

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: VITA 3D Master shade guide is a newly launched colorimetric system in recent years, with a wide clinical prospect. 
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of dentin colorimetric evaluation for accurate color section of cast ceramic prostheses.
METHODS: Using conventional colorimetric assay and conventional colorimetric assay combined with dentin colorimetric assay (combined colorimetric assay), 30 patients were subject to colorimetric evaluation 1/3 to the neck, central part, and cut end of the tooth. In CIE1976L * a * b * color system, a digital SLR camera (Canon D50) was used for colorimetric measurement and analysis of cast ceramic prostheses prepared with two colorimetric methods and teeth with the same name. And a variety of new colorimetric methods were analyzed based on examples.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In the conventional colorimetric group, △L*was 1.22±0.16, △C* was 1.19±0.20, △H* was 0.31±0.05, △E* was 1.32±0.13. in the combined colorimetric group, △L*was 1.03±0.11, △C* was 1.12±0.19, △H*was 0.29±0.03, △E* was 1.23±0.11. Cast ceramic prostheses prepared by conventional colorimetric method were satisfactory in 22 cases, while cast ceramic prostheses prepared by the combined colorimetric method were satisfactory in 23 cases. There was no difference in patient satisfaction for color rendition (P > 0.05), but chromatic difference analysis was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05).


中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:生物材料;骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性;组织工程


全文链接:

Key words: tooth diseases, tooth discoloration, tooth injuries, tooth loss, tooth abrasion

中图分类号: