BACKGROUND: Traditional high tibia osteotomy relies on preoperative planning and intraoperative fluoroscopy to adjust the angle of correction, but it is affected by position, perspective and measurement error, so it is instability. Some studies have reported that computer navigated high tibia osteotomy can improve the accuracy of the correction angle. As the number of cases in previous studies is small and controversial, it is necessary to systematically analyze and evaluate the clinical and imaging results of computer navigated high tibia osteotomy and traditional surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the clinical and imaging results of computer navigated versus conventional opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.
METHODS: Databases of PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, WanFang, and VIP were retrieved for the clinical studies about computer navigated versus conventional opening wedge high tibial osteotomy before April 2018. The quality of the studies was evaluated by two researchers, and heterogeneity test and meta-analysis were conducted on RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Thirteen clinical studies involving 1 030 patients with genu varum were enrolled, 471 patients underwent computer navigated high tibial osteotomy (navigation group), and 559 patients underwent opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (traditional group). (2) Results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the traditional group, patients in the navigation group had better weight bearing line ratio, closest to Fujisawa point (
MD=2.14, 95%
CI (0.23, 4.05)), less increase in tibial posterior slope (
MD=-1.27, 95%
CI (-1.95, -0.60)), more exact mechanical axis (
MD=0.81, 95%
CI (0.37, 1.25)), lower in outliers of alignment (
OR=0.39, 95%
CI (0.27, 0.59)) and longer operation time (
MD=14.90, 95%
CI (9.93, 19.88)). There were no significant differences in Lysholm score (
MD=1.30, 95%
CI (-0.31, 2.90)), range of motion of knee (
MD=3.19, 95%
CI (-1.60, 7.98)), delayed union rate at tibia osteotomy (
OR=1.58, 95%
CI (0.44, 5.65)), and infection rate (
OR=1.75, 95%
CI (0.37, 8.30)) between two groups. (3) These results indicate that compared with conventional opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, computer-navigated high tibial osteotomy obtains more accurate radiographic results, and longer operation time, but no difference is found in Lysholm score, delayed union rate or infection rate. Due to the limitations of this study, the conclusion still needs to be investigated by large samples and long-term randomized controlled studies to confirm the long-term efficacy and imaging findings.
中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱;骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程