中国组织工程研究

中国组织工程研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 499-502.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.03.029

• 生物材料临床实践 clinical practice of biomaterials • 上一篇    下一篇

负极性静电荷-聚四氟乙烯高分子体膜联合腰椎牵引治疗根性腰痛

白  雪，史  超，刘  杰，张凯波，温  珉   

  1. 新疆医科大学第六附属医院康复科，新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市   830002
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-28 修回日期:2010-11-22 出版日期:2011-01-15 发布日期:2011-01-15
  • 作者简介:白雪，女，1961年生，山西省运城县人，汉族，1987年新疆医科大学毕业，副主任医师，主要从事脊柱、骨伤疾病康复治疗的研究。 bxxjm@sina.com

Negative electrostatic charge-polytetrafluoroethylene polymer membrane combined lumbar traction for treatment of radicular back pain

Bai Xue, Shi Chao, Liu Jie, Zhang Kai-bo, Wen Min   

  1. Department of Rehabilitation, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi  830002, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2010-09-28 Revised:2010-11-22 Online:2011-01-15 Published:2011-01-15
  • About author:Bai Xue, Associate chief physician, Department of Rehabilitation, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830002, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China bxxjm@sina.com

PDF

707

被引次数

6

摘要：

背景：负极性静电荷高分子材料、聚四氟乙烯微孔驻极体膜贴于患处表面,可形成高压静电和负静电场，中和患病局部聚集的正电荷。
目的：验证负极性静电荷-聚四氟乙烯高分子体膜联合腰椎牵引治疗根性腰痛的临床效果。
方法：将120例根性腰痛患者随机分为3组：牵引组、负极性静电荷-聚四氟乙烯高分子体膜组(简称体膜组)和结合组。结合组患者联合上述两种方法治疗。治疗1个月后，通过日本矫形外科学会(JOA)评分评估治疗效果。
结果与结论：治疗1个月后3组患者JOA评分为：结合组> 牵引组> 体膜组，差异均有显著性意义(P < 0.05)。结合组患者腰痛改善指数、改善率明显高于与其他两组。提示负极性静电荷-聚四氟乙烯高分子体膜联合腰椎牵引治疗根性腰痛效果好于单纯牵引或负极性静电荷-聚四氟乙烯高分子体膜治疗。

关键词: 聚四氟乙烯高分子体膜, 根性腰痛, 负极性静电荷, 腰椎牵引, 生物材料

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The negative electrostatic charge polymer materials, porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) electret film affixed to the surface of the skin surface can form a high-voltage static electricity and negative electrostatic field, and neutralize the accumulation of positive charge in the lesion.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the negative electrostatic charge-PTFE polymer membrane in combination with lumbar traction for the treatment of radicular back pain.
METHODS: A total of 120 cases of radicular low back pain were randomly divided into three groups: traction group, negative electrostatic charge-PTFE polymer membrane group and combination group. Patients with combined treatment were treated with two methods together. One month later, three groups of patients were observed through the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) to assess the efficacy.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: One month after treatment, the JOA scores of three groups was combination group > traction group > negative electrostatic charge-PTFE polymer membrane group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The improved index and improvement rate of low back pain in patients of combination group were significantly higher than the other two groups. The negative electrostatic charge-PTFE polymer membrane in combined with lumbar traction is superior to negative electrostatic charge-PTFE polymer membrane treatment alone for radicular back pain.

中图分类号: