Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2013, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (8): 1481-1488.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.08.025
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhang Wei, Kang Hai-han, Zhang Yong-lei, Kong Ye, Hua Ya-wei
Received:
2012-06-18
Revised:
2012-08-27
Online:
2013-02-19
Published:
2013-02-19
Contact:
Hua Ya-wei, Master, Chief physician, Master’s supervisor, Henan Tumor Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, Henan Province, China
yaweihua@qq.com
About author:
Zhang Wei★, Studying for master’s degree, Henan Tumor Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, Henan Province, China
zzuzwys@163.com
CLC Number:
Zhang Wei, Kang Hai-han, Zhang Yong-lei, Kong Ye, Hua Ya-wei. Different release properties and targeting effects of sustained-release drugs for the treatment of gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2013, 17(8): 1481-1488.
2.1 5-氟尿嘧啶药物载体缓释系统治疗胃癌的药物缓释特性 5-氟尿嘧啶是临床上常用的抗代谢类抗肿瘤类药物,血浆半衰期仅为10-20 min,治疗剂量和中毒剂量接近,为了达到较好的治疗效果,大剂量应用5-氟尿嘧啶会增加药物的毒副作用,同时5-氟尿嘧啶在体内不断地被分解代谢,不能维持有效的药物浓度。聚乳酸和壳聚糖是目前常用的药物缓释载体,聚乳酸具有良好的生物相容性和可降解性,在体内最终的代谢产物是水和二氧化碳,而中间产物乳酸是机体内糖代谢的产物,不会在重要器官组织内聚集[23-25]。壳聚糖也具有良好的生物相容性和可降解性,对其进行改性后可制备成各种性质的药物缓释载体,常用的有壳聚糖微球、壳聚糖缓释片、壳聚糖缓释膜以及壳聚糖缓释凝胶等,壳聚糖缓释药物载体具有抗菌、抗肿瘤和抗突变、免疫刺激、调节凝血功能及脂质代谢等多种药理活性[26-32]。易兵鸿[14]、马菲菲[15]、黄开红等[16]和胡云霞等[17]分别对5-氟尿嘧啶聚乳酸、5-氟尿嘧啶壳聚糖缓释药物的特征以及对胃癌的治疗作用进行了研究分析,发现5-氟尿嘧啶聚乳酸、5-氟尿嘧啶壳聚糖缓释药物具有良好的药物缓释性能以及较好的胃癌治疗效果,能够延长药物与肿瘤组织的作用时间,发挥更强的胃癌治疗作用,具体分析结果见表2。"
对5-氟尿嘧啶缓释药物系统的肿瘤靶向作用进行研究分析,发现由腹腔灌注化疗缓释药物而导致化疗药物分布浓度由高到低依次为癌周淋巴结、胃癌组织、腹膜、胃黏膜、大网膜、小网膜,而由静脉滴注化疗缓释药物而导致化疗药物分布浓度由高到低依次为癌周淋巴结、胃癌组织、胃黏膜、腹膜、大网膜、小网膜。腹腔灌注化疗缓释药物使局部组织的药物浓度更高。 2.2 丝裂霉素药物载体缓释系统治疗胃癌的药物缓释特性 丝裂霉素是一种广谱抗肿瘤药物,属于细胞周期非特异性药物,固体状态时性质稳定,在酸性和碱性溶液中容易失去活性,易溶于水、甲醇和丙酮等有机溶剂,微溶于苯、乙醚和四氯化碳,不溶于石油醚。静脉注射时初始相半衰期为17 min,终止相半衰期为50 min,经肝脏代谢,肾脏排出体外。活性碳吸 附丝裂霉素具有较高的吸附性和良好的缓释功能,以及良好的淋巴靶向性,毒副作用小[33]。直径较小的缓释药物可以选择性地进入淋巴管,聚集到区域淋巴结内,而较大直径的缓释药物则可以被乳糜斑摄入[34-35]。活性碳作为载体吸附丝裂霉素缓释药物已被证明具有良好的抗肿瘤活性[36-37]。张李[20]研究分析了纳米活性碳吸附丝裂霉素C对胃癌的靶向作用,发现纳米活性碳吸附丝裂霉素C对胃癌组织周围的淋巴结具有更强的靶向性。具体分析结果见表4。 张浩[19]对活性碳吸附丝裂霉素缓释药物的药物缓释特性以及抗肿瘤作用进行了分析,实验获得活性碳吸附丝裂霉素缓释药物微球的粒径为(60.0± 20.0) nm,载药量为20.0%,具有良好的药物缓释作用,可持续缓释药物28 d,累积释放药量70.1%。对胃癌组织的抑制作用明显高于单纯应用丝裂霉素,而对正常组织的损伤作用明显小于单纯应用丝裂霉素,能够有效抑制胃癌的转移和复发。"
文章研究显示纳米活性炭吸附丝裂霉素对胃癌有较强的靶向治疗作用,尤其是对癌组织周围的淋巴靶向作用更强,其次是肠系膜和腹腔液,而血浆中的药物浓度很低。纳米活性炭吸附丝裂霉素对胃癌的治疗具有肿瘤高度选择性,采用腹腔灌注药物的给药途径,缩短了药物到达肿瘤的时间,延长了药物与肿瘤的作用时间,维持腹腔内较高的有效药物浓度,明显提高了药物对胃癌组织的抑制和杀伤作用。因此,纳米活性炭吸附丝裂霉素缓释药物是一种较为理想治疗胃癌的缓释药物系统,具有广泛应用的可能性。 2.3 几丁糖-顺铂药物载体缓释系统治疗胃癌的药物缓释特性 顺铂是临床常用的化疗药物之一,属于细胞周期非特异性药物,具有细胞毒性,可抑制肿瘤细胞的DNA复制过程,并损伤其细胞膜结构,从而发挥抗肿瘤的作用,具有广谱抗肿瘤的作用。但单纯应用顺铂治疗胃癌,会产生骨髓抑制、肾脏毒性以及神经毒性等各种毒副作用,因此,应用时常采用缓释药物材料负载化疗药物。几丁糖是甲壳素经浓碱水脱去乙酰基后生成的阳离子水溶性聚合物,其分子内的活性基团亚胺基,可以与含双官能团的醛或酸酐药物化学偶联,使化疗药物大量分布于偶联结构内,发挥缓释抗肿瘤的作用[38]。几丁糖能够溶于酸性溶液中,具有良好的生物黏附性、良好的组织相容性、良好的自然降解性和较强的吸附性能,是一种较为理想的缓释药物载体[39-42]。朱共元[21]和魏玉亮[22]分别对几丁糖-顺铂药物载体缓释系统的特征以及对胃癌的治疗作用进行了研究分析,发现几丁糖-顺铂缓释药膜能够持续释放药物7 d,具有良好的药物缓释性能,同时具有较强的胃癌组织抑制作用。对几丁糖-顺铂药物缓释系统进行体外实验研究发现,与单纯药物顺铂、几丁糖相比较,几丁糖-顺铂缓释药膜对肿瘤组织的作用时间更长,并且药物浓度明显高于单纯药物应用时的浓度,对肿瘤组织的抑制作用也明显高于单纯药物的应用,具体结果见表5-7。"
[1] Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1999; 80(6):827-841. [2] 周有尚,张思维.我国人口死亡和恶性肿瘤死亡情况分析[J].中国肿瘤,1997,6(10):9-12.[3] Maehara Y, Moriguchi S, Kakeji Y, et al. Pertinent risk factors and gastric carcinoma with synchronous peritoneal dissemination or liver metastasis. Surgery. 1991;110(5): 820-823. [4] Yoo CH, Noh SH, Shin DW, et al. Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2000; 87(2):236-242. [5] 陆枫林,陆亚琴.腹腔化疗前后对腹水端粒酶活性影响研究[J].中华消化杂志,2004,24(2):110-111.[6] Elias D, Bonnay M, Puizillou JM, et al. Heated intra-operative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin after complete resection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(2):267-272. [7] 王江.比较顺铂不同给药方式对腹膜移植瘤的影响[J].中国实用医药,2007,2(16):11-13.[8] 唐贺文.活性碳吸附丝裂霉素C腹腔化疗的药代动力学研究[D].天津:天津医科大学,2002:1-76. [9] Shanmuganathan S, Shanmugasundaram N, Adhirajan N, et al. Preparation and characterization of chitosan microspheres for doxycycline delivery. Cabohydr Polym. 2008;73(2): 201-211.[10] Park SH, Chun MK, Choi HK. Preparation of an extended-release matrix tablet using chitosan/Carbopol interpolymer complex. Int J Pharm. 2008;347(1-2):39-44. [11] Tomlinson E. Site-specific drug carriers. Eng Med. 1986;15(4):197-202. [12] Gavrilov K, Saltzman WM. Therapeutic siRNA: principles, challenges, and strategies. Yale J Biol Med. 2012; 85(2): 187-200. [13] 中国知网.中国学术期刊总库[DB/OL].2012-11-16. https://www.cnki.net.[14] 易兵鸿.5-氟脲嘧啶壳聚糖缓释微球抑制裸鼠腹腔种植胃癌细胞生长的实验研究[D].江西:南昌大学,2010:1-31.[15] 马菲菲.应用载药微球局部化疗治疗胃癌的实验性研究[D].天津:天津医科大学,2008:1-62. [16] 黄开红,赵晓龙,朱兆华,等.5-氟尿嘧啶聚乳酸载药纳米微粒对人胃癌和结肠癌细胞株的体外杀伤效应[J].中国实验外科杂志, 2005,22(5):606-608.[17] 胡云霞,原续波,张晓金,等.聚乳酸载药纳米微粒的表面修饰及体外评价[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2004,23(1):30-36.[18] 李勇,刘滨伟,杜文力,等.复方氟脲嘧啶的术前腹腔应用及其在胃癌组织中的分布[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(10):638-640.[19] 张浩.淋巴靶向抗癌药物卡波霉素载体制备方法优化及药效研究[D].北京:中国人民解放军军事医学科学院,2011:1-76.[20] 张李.纳米炭吸附丝裂霉素C腹腔化疗的药代动力学研究[D].天津:天津医科大学,2007:1-52.[21] 朱共元.几丁糖—顺铂缓释药膜抑制胃癌腹膜亚临床转移的实验研究[D].江西:南昌大学,2009:1-39.[22] 魏玉亮.几丁糖—顺铂缓释药膜的制备及体外抑制胃癌细胞生长的研究[D].江西:南昌大学,2008:1-31.[23] 秦仁义,裘法祖.纳米生物技术在实验外科的应用前景[J].中华实验外科杂志,2003,20(9):773-775.[24] 周平红,姚礼庆,秦新裕,等.磁性阿霉素纳米脂质体的研制及其磁靶向定位研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(4):492.[25] Mukherji G, Murthy RSR, Miglani BD. Preparation and evaluation of polyglutaraldehyde nanoparticles containing 5-fluorouracil. Int J Pharm. 1989;50:15-19. [26] 郑连英,朱江峰,孙昆山.壳聚糖的抗菌性能研究[J].材料科学与工程,2000,18(2):22-24.[27] 王红昌,孙晓飞.不同分子量高脱乙酰度壳聚糖的制备及表征[J].中国海洋药物,2007,26(1):16-19.[28] Seyfarth F, Schliemann S, Elsner P, et al. Antifungal effect of high- and low-molecular-weight chitosan hydrochloride, carboxymethyl chitosan, chitosan oligosaccharide and N-acetyl- D-glucosamine against Candida albicans, Candida krusei and Candida glabrata. Int J Pharm. 2008;353(1-2):139-148. [29] 陈威,吴清平,张菊梅,等.壳聚糖抑菌机制的初步研究[J].微生物学报,2008,48(2):164-168.[30] 宋永焕,刘一,于铁成,等.壳聚糖纳米颗粒免疫刺激作用的初步研究[J].浙江医学,2008,30(11):1208-1210.[31] Cho EJ, Rahman MA, Kim SW, et al. Chitosan oligosaccharides inhibit adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18(1):80-87. [32] 房国坚,蒋玉燕,毕忆群,等.壳聚糖纳米混悬剂抗突变生物学效应:原核细胞基因突变试验[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2008,12(45):8867-8869.[33] Frasci G, Iaffaioli RV, Comella G, et al. Intraperitoneal adjuvant immunochemotherapy in operable gastric cancer with serosal involvement. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1994; 6(6):364-370. [34] 梁寒,王殿昌,张高嘉.胃镜下胃粘膜注墨32例临床应用[J].重庆医学,1998,27(增):265-266.[35] Hagiwara A. Mitomycin C adsorbed to activated carbon particles as a new drug dosage form for cancer chemotherapy. Akita J Med. 1983;10:187-189.[36] 梁寒,王殿昌,孙慧,等.活性碳吸附丝裂霉素C腹腔化疗的临床实验研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2000,27(12):897-901.[37] Shimotsuma M, Shields JW, Simpson-Morgan MW, et al. Morpho-physiological function and role of omental milky spots as omentum-associated lymphoid tissue (OALT) in the peritoneal cavity. Lymphology. 1993;26(2):90-101. [38] Felt O, Buri P, Gurny R. Chitosan: a unique polysaccharide for drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1998;24(11):979-993. [39] Felt O, Furrer P, Mayer JM, et al. Topical use of chitosan in ophthalmology: tolerance assessment and evaluation of precorneal retention. Int J Pharm. 1999;180(2):185-193. [40] Yuan Y, Zhang P, Yang Y, et al. The interaction of Schwann cells with chitosan membranes and fibers in vitro. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):4273-4278. [41] Mi FL, Tan YC, Liang HF, et al. In vivo biocompatibility and degradability of a novel injectable-chitosan-based implant. Biomaterials. 2002;23(1):181-191. [42] 田冶,焦延鹏,陈义康,等.不同脱乙酰度对壳聚糖表面物理及吸附性能的影响[J].广州化学,2005,30(2):20-25.[43] Bonelli P, Tuccillo FM, Federico A, et al. Ibuprofen delivered by poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles to human gastric cancer cells exerts antiproliferative activity at very low concentrations. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7: 5683-5691.[44] Liu P, Wang H, Wang Q, et al. cRGD conjugated mPEG-PLGA-PLL nanoparticles for SGC-7901 gastric cancer cells-targeted Delivery of fluorouracil. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2012;12(6):4467-4471.[45] Harada M, Iwata C, Saito H, et al. NC-6301, a polymeric micelle rationally optimized for effective release of docetaxel, is potent but is less toxic than native docetaxel in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:2713-2727. [46] Li CJ, Chu CY, Huang LH, et al. Synergistic anticancer activity of triptolide combined with cisplatin enhances apoptosis in gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2012;319(2): 203-213.[47] Zhang J, Zhu JS, Zhou Z, et al. Inhibitory effects of ethyl pyruvate administration on human gastric cancer growth via regulation of the HMGB1-RAGE and Akt pathways in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2012;27(5):1511-1519. [48] Shapira A, Davidson I, Avni N, et al. β-Casein nanoparticle-based oral drug delivery system for potential treatment of gastric carcinoma: stability, target-activated release and cytotoxicity. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2012;80(2):298-305. [49] Vaghani S, Vasanti S, Chaturvedi K, et al. Stomach-specific drug delivery of 5-fluorouracil using ethylcellulose floating microspheres. Pharm Dev Technol. 2010;15(2):154-161. [50] Prabu P, Chaudhari AA, Aryal S, et al. In vitro evaluation of poly(caporlactone) grafted dextran (PGD) nanoparticles with cancer cell. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19(5): 2157-2163.[51] Manfredi S, Pagenault M, de Lajarte-Thirouard AS, et al. Type 1 and 2 gastric carcinoid tumors: long-term follow-up of the efficacy of treatment with a slow-releasesomatostatin analogue. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;19(11): 1021-1025.[52] Chen SH, Lin KY, Chang CC, et al. Aloe-emodin-induced apoptosis in human gastric carcinoma cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45(11):2296-2303. [53] 王银松,李英霞,宋妮,等.靶向抗肿瘤药物甲氨喋呤—琥珀酰壳聚糖缀合物的制备及其体外稳定性的初步探讨[J].高等学校化学学报,2003,24(11):2103-2106.[54] 黄园,袁芳,张志荣.肿瘤靶向给药系统的研究进展[J].华西药学杂志,2006,21(6):566-569.[55] Ikehara Y, Niwa T, Biao L, et al. A carbohydrate recognition-based drug delivery and controlled release system using intraperitoneal macrophages as a cellular vehicle. Cancer Res. 2006;66(17):8740-8748. |
[1] | Zhang Chao, Lü Xin. Heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture fixation: risk factors, prevention and treatment progress [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(9): 1434-1439. |
[2] | Li Li, Ma Li. Immobilization of lactase on magnetic chitosan microspheres and its effect on enzymatic properties [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(4): 576-581. |
[3] | Liu Fang, Shan Zhengming, Tang Yulei, Wu Xiaomin, Tian Weiqun. Effects of hemostasis and promoting wound healing of ozone sustained-release hydrogel [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(22): 3445-3449. |
[4] | Li Xinping, Cui Qiuju, Zeng Shuguang, Ran Gaoying, Zhang Zhaoqiang, Liu Xianwen, Fang Wei, Xu Shuaimei. Effect of modification of β-tricalcium phosphate/chitosan hydrogel on growth and mineralization of dental pulp stem cells [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(22): 3493-3499. |
[5] | Zhou Anqi, Tang Yufei, Wu Bingfeng, Xiang Lin. Designing of periosteum tissue engineering: combination of generality and individuality [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(22): 3551-3557. |
[6] | Huo Hua, Cheng Yuting, Zhou Qian, Qi Yuhan, Wu Chao, Shi Qianhui, Yang Tongjing, Liao Jian, Hong Wei. Effects of drug coating on implant surface on the osseointegration [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(22): 3558-3564. |
[7] | Lang Limin, He Sheng, Jiang Zengyu, Hu Yiyi, Zhang Zhixing, Liang Minqian. Application progress of conductive composite materials in the field of tissue engineering treatment of myocardial infarction [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(22): 3584-3590. |
[8] | Chen Siyu, Li Yannan, Xie Liying, Liu Siqi, Fan Yurong, Fang Changxing, Zhang Xin, Quan Jiayu, Zuo Lin. Thermosensitive chitosan-collagen composite hydrogel loaded with basic fibroblast growth factor retards ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in mice [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(16): 2472-2478. |
[9] | Liu Feng, Zhang Yu, Wang Yanli, Luo Wei, Han Chaoshan, Li Yangxin. Application of temperature-sensitive chitosan hydrogel encapsulated exosomes in ischemic diseases [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(16): 2479-2487. |
[10] | Li Jie, Xu Jianzhen, Hu Ping, Lei Qiqi, Zhang Wenning, Ao Ningjian . Preparation and performance evaluation of carboxymethyl chitosan/oxidized glucomannan/Panax notoginseng compound sponge dressing for chronic wound [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(16): 2528-2534. |
[11] | Xie Jian, Su Jiansheng. Advantages and characteristics of electrospun aligned nanofibers as scaffolds for tissue engineering [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(16): 2575-2581. |
[12] | Ji Qi, Yu Zhengwen, Zhang Jian. Problems and trends of technique and clinical application of metallic biomaterials prepared by three-dimensional printing technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(16): 2597-2604. |
[13] | Qian Nannan, Zhang Qian, Yang Rui, Ao Jun, Zhang Tao. Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord injury: cell therapy and combination of new drugs and biomaterials [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(13): 2114-2120. |
[14] | Jia Wei, Zhang Mandong, Chen Weiyi, Wang Chenyan, Guo Yuan. Effects of femoral prosthetic materials on artificial knee arthroplasty performance [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(10): 1477-1481. |
[15] | Wang Qian, Li Lu, Shu Jingyuan, Dong Zhiheng, Jin Youshi, Wang Qingshan. Micro-morphology and phase of zirconia-based nano-hydroxyapatite functional gradient biomaterials [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2021, 25(10): 1517-1521. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||