中国组织工程研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (32): 5166-5172.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.32.014

• 脐带脐血干细胞 umbilical cord blood stem cells • 上一篇    下一篇

脐带和胚胎肝来源间充质干细胞生长特性的比较

毕薇薇,何丽嵘,粘丽丽   

  1. 吉林省拓华生物科技有限公司干细胞实验室,吉林省四平市  136000
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-26 出版日期:2014-08-06 发布日期:2014-09-18
  • 通讯作者: 毕薇薇,博士,主任技师,吉林省拓华生物科技有限公司干细胞实验室,吉林省四平市 136000
  • 作者简介:毕薇薇,女,1974年生,吉林省四平市人,汉族,博士,主任技师,主要从事干细胞培养及应用研究。

Growth characteristics of umbilical cord-derived versus embryonic liver-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Bi Wei-wei, He Li-rong, Nian Li-li   

  1. Jilin Province TaHua Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Siping 136000, Jilin Province, China
  • Received:2014-06-26 Online:2014-08-06 Published:2014-09-18
  • Contact: Bi Wei-wei, M.D., Chief technician, Jilin Province TaHua Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Siping 136000, Jilin Province, China
  • About author:Bi Wei-wei, M.D., Chief technician, Jilin Province TaHua Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Siping 136000, Jilin Province, China

摘要:

背景:不同来源的干细胞具有不同的分子特征及生长特性,对疾病治疗的机制及效果可能会有所差异。
目的:比较两种来源间充质干细胞的生物学特性。
方法:分离培养人脐带源、胚胎肝来源的间充质干细胞,传至第5代时分别进行细胞形态观察,细胞群体倍增时间计算,细胞表面标志鉴定,诱导分化能力检测。另外将脐带源间充质干细胞继续培养至第10,15代,绘制生长曲线并计算细胞群体倍增时间。
结果与结论:两种来源的间充质干细胞在对数生长期均为梭形,旋涡状生长,均具有成骨、成脂、成软骨分化的能力。两种间充质干细胞的生长曲线均为S形。第5代胎肝来源间充质干细胞的倍增时间为(34.37±0.31) h,脐带源间充质干细胞的倍增时间为(35.63±0.38) h,差异无显著性意义(P > 0.05)。第10代和第15代脐带源间充质干细胞的倍增时间分别为(52.6±0.53) h和(53.27±0.92) h,与第5代比较差异有显著性意义(P < 0.05)。结果可见两种来源间充质干细胞生物学特性基本相同,肉眼观察胎肝来源间充质干细胞比脐带源间充质干细胞形态稍小,增殖较快,但统计学上差异无显著性意义。


中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:干细胞;骨髓干细胞;造血干细胞;脂肪干细胞;肿瘤干细胞;胚胎干细胞;脐带脐血干细胞;干细胞诱导;干细胞分化;组织工程


全文链接:

关键词: 干细胞, 脐带脐血干细胞, 肝干细胞, 脐带间充质干细胞, 生长曲线, 倍增时间

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Different sources of stem cells have different molecular characteristics and growth characteristics; therefore, there are some differences in therapeutic mechanisms and effects.
OBJECTIVE: To compare mesenchymal stem cells growth characteristics form two sources.
METHODS: Mesenchymal stem cells from the umbilical cord and the embryonic liver were isolated and cultured. Passage 5 cells were used to observe the cell morphology, calculate the doubling time of cell population-doubling time, identify surface markers and determine the differentiation capacity. Mesenchymal stem cells from the umbilical cord were subcultured to passages 10 and 15, and cell curves were drawn and population doubling time was calculated.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Mesenchymal stem cells from these two sources in logarithmic phase were fusiform and grew spirally with osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic capacities. The growth curves of cells were both S-shaped. At passage 5, the doubling time was (34.37±0.31) hours for embryonic liver-derived mesenchymal stem cells and (35.63±0.38) hours for umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells, and there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). However, the population doubling time of passages 10 and 15 umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells was (52.6±0.53) and (53.27±0.92) hours, respectively, which was significantly difference from that of passage 5 cells (P < 0.05). The cell morphology and growth curve from two sources are basically the same. Embryonic liver-derived stem cells are smaller and proliferate faster than umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells, but no statistical difference is found between the two types.


中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:干细胞;骨髓干细胞;造血干细胞;脂肪干细胞;肿瘤干细胞;胚胎干细胞;脐带脐血干细胞;干细胞诱导;干细胞分化;组织工程


全文链接:

中图分类号: