中国组织工程研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (46): 8677-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2010.46.031

• 组织构建学术探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国康复医学系统评价/Meta分析的研究进展

周煜凡1,宋俊生2,熊  俊3,高  岑3,薛晓焕3,商铁刚4   

  1. 天津中医药大学,1针灸学院,2伤寒教研室,3研究生部,天津市 300193;4天津中医药大学第一附属医院内分泌科,天津市  300193
  • 出版日期:2010-11-12 发布日期:2010-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 熊俊,硕士,天津中医药大学研究生部,天津市 300193 xiongjun196072@yahoo.com.cn
  • 作者简介:周煜凡,女,1987年生,汉族,江苏省无锡市人,主要从事循证医学和康复医学的研究。xiaofan7073@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    本课题受国家自然科学基金(30973726)资助。

Research progress in systematic evaluation/meta-analysis of rehabilitation medicine in China

Zhou Yu-fan1, Song Jun-sheng 2, Xiong Jun3, Gao Cen3, Xue Xiao-huan 3, Shang Tie-gang4   

  1. 1Acupuncture College, 2Department of Exogenous Febrile Disease, 3Department of Post-graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin   300193, China; 4Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital,
  • Online:2010-11-12 Published:2010-11-12
  • Contact: Xiong Jun, Master, Department of Post-graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi 300193, Jiangsu Province, China xiongjun196072@yahoo.com.cn
  • About author:Zhou Yu-fan, Acupuncture College, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi 300193, Jiangsu Province, China xiaofan7073@sina.com
  • Supported by:

    the National Science Foundation of China,No.30973726*

摘要:

背景:循证医学与康复医学的结合日益紧密,尤其是为康复医学的临床实践工作,提供了遵循科学的原则、方法和依据。
目的:系统回顾国内康复医学系统评价/Meta分析的研究情况。
方法:由第一作者用计算机全面检索中国知网数据库(CNKI:1979/2009)、维普数据库(VIP:1989/2009)、万方数字化期刊群(WF:1998/2009)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM:1978/2009)数据库,每个数据库都进行二次检索,第一检索词都为“系统综述”,“系统评价”,“Meta分析”和“荟萃分析”,语言设定为中文;第二检索词都为“康复疗法”,“物理疗法”,“作业疗法”,“言语治疗”,“音乐疗法”,“physiotherapy”,“physical Therapy”,“occupational therapy”,“speech therapy”和“music therapy”等,语言分别设定为中文和英文。对所得相关文献的评价方法、干预对象、发表年份、文献来源、纳入试验等进行描述性分析。
结果与结论:2002年至今,共检索到59篇文献,经筛选有10篇符合纳入标准的文献;其中物理疗法6篇、音乐疗法3篇、康复综合治疗1篇;评价病症有8种,大多为神经系统疾病。文献篇数逐年增加,研究内容以物理疗法居多,并从多角度评价康复疗法的临床疗效国内康复医学系统评价/Meta分析研究尚处于起步阶段,希望今后的研究在遵循循证医学理念和方法的基础上,探索出符合康复医学自身特点的方法学。

关键词: 康复医学, 循证医学, 系统评价, Meta分析

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The combination of evidence-based medicine and rehabilitation medicine is increasingly close, and provides the evidence-based principle, method and reference particularly for the clinical practice of rehabilitation medicine.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the research situation of systematic evaluation/meta-analysis of rehabilitation medicine in China.
METHODS: Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (1979/2009), VIP database (1989/2009), Wanfang (1998/2009) and CBMdisc (1978/2009) database were overall retrieved by the first author using computer. Each database was retrieved twice. The first research terms were “systematic review”, “systematic evaluation”, and “meta-analysis”, and language was limited to Chinese. The second research terms were “rehabilitation therapy”, “physiotherapy” (physical therapy), “occupational therapy”,“speech therapy” , and “music therapy”, and language was limited to Chinese and English. From the literature, evaluation methods, intervention targets, year of publication, literature sources, and trials were descriptively analyzed.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Since 2002, a total of 59 articles were retrieved. After screening, 10 articles met the inclusion criteria, including physical therapy/physiotherapy (6 articles), music therapy (3 articles), comprehensive rehabilitation therapy    (1 article), and evaluation of disease (8 kinds, most of them are nervous system disease). The number of articles increased year by year. Most contents were about physiotherapy. Clinical rehabilitation therapy was assessed from multiple perspectives. The systematic evaluation/meta-analysis of rehabilitation medicine in China is still in the initial stage. We look forward to explore a new style of methodology to be in conformity with the characteristics of rehabilitation medicine, based on the principle and methods of evidence-based medicine in the future research.

中图分类号: