中国组织工程研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (30): 4789-4794.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2842

• 人工假体 artificial prosthesis • 上一篇    下一篇

全髋关节置换术中静滴氨甲环酸联合置换后放置或不放置引流管的对比

王望任,石俊俊,黄凌岸,张志强   

  1. 山西医科大学第二医院骨关节科,山西省太原市   030000
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-02 修回日期:2020-01-08 接受日期:2020-03-07 出版日期:2020-10-28 发布日期:2020-09-18
  • 通讯作者: 张志强,主任医师,山西医科大学第二医院骨关节科,山西省太原市 030000
  • 作者简介:王望任,男,1995年生,海南省海口市人,汉族,山西医科大学在读硕士,医师,主要从事关节外科与运动医学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(31300802)

Comparison of placement or non-placement of drainage tube after intravenous drip of tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty

Wang Wangren, Shi Junjun, Huang Lingan, Zhang Zhiqiang   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi Province, China
  • Received:2020-01-02 Revised:2020-01-08 Accepted:2020-03-07 Online:2020-10-28 Published:2020-09-18
  • Contact: Zhang Zhiqiang, Chief physician, Department of Orthopedics, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi Province, China
  • About author:Wang Wangren, Master candidate, Physician, Department of Orthopedics, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi Province, China
  • Supported by:

    the Youth Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 31300802

摘要:

文题释义:

全髋关节置换:指用模拟人体关节结构的材料置换病损的关节,被誉为是治疗髋关节退行性骨关节炎及股骨头坏死、先天性髋关节发育不良等髋关节疾患最有效的骨科手术方式之一,可以缓解髋关节疼痛,纠正髋关节的畸形,改善髋关节运动功能,提高患者生活质量。

氨甲环酸:是氨基酸中赖氨酸的合成衍生物,是一种抗纤维蛋白溶解剂,使纤溶酶原向纤溶酶的转化降低,导致纤维蛋白原向纤维蛋白的分解受到抑制,使纤维蛋白血凝块的酶降解降低,最终减少失血量。

背景:全髋关节置换后放置引流管的目的在于引流出髋部积聚的血液,以加速患者康复。但由于术中已静脉滴入氨甲环酸,并可产生确切的减少失血的效果,术后常规放置引流管是否仍有必要?

目的:探讨在全髋关节置换术中静滴氨甲环酸止血的基础上术后是否需要放置引流管。

方法选择20176月至20193月山西医科大学第二医院收治的初次单侧全髋关节置换患者132例,术中均静脉滴注氨甲环酸,其中62例全髋关节置换后放置引流管(引流组)70例全髋关节置换后不放置引流管(无引流组)。比较两组术后失血量、输血率、输血量、血红蛋白值及并发症发生情况;比较术后两组患者平均住院时间;术后随访髋关节Harris评分。试验获得山西医科大学第二医院伦理委员会批准。

结果与结论:①两组术后失血量、输血率、输血量与血红蛋白值比较差异均无显著性意义(P > 0.05);②引流组4例发生双下肢深静脉血栓,无引流组2例发生双下肢深静脉血栓,组间比较差异无显著性意义(P > 0.05);③引流组出现了3例渗血渗液、3例感染、2例肿胀瘀斑,无引流组出现了1例渗血渗液、1例肿胀瘀斑,两组切口并发症比较差异有显著性意义(P < 0.05);④引流组平均住院时间长于无引流组(P < 0.05);⑤两组术后1,3,6个月的髋关节Harris评分比较差异均无显著性意义(P > 0.05);⑥结果表明,全髋关节置换术中静滴止血药物氨甲环酸后无需进行引流管放置。

ORCID: 0000-0002-2408-2843(王望任)

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱;骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程

关键词: 骨, 关节, 假体, 氨甲环酸, 失血, 输血, 切口并发症, 髋关节功能

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The purpose of placing drainage tube after total hip arthroplasty is to drain the accumulated blood in the hip, so as to accelerate the recovery of patients. However, since tranexamic acid has been infused intravenously during the operation, and the effect of blood loss can be reduced exactly. It remains poorly understood that whether it is necessary to place a drainage tube routinely after the operation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the drainage tube should be placed on the basis of hemostasis by intravenous drip of tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS: From June 2017 to March 2019, 132 patients with primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty admitted to the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were selected. During the operation, tranexamic acid was infused intravenously. Drainage tube was placed in 62 patients (drainage group) after total hip arthroplasty, and not placed in 70 patients (non-drainage group). The blood loss, blood transfusion rate, blood transfusion volume, hemoglobin value and complications were compared between the two groups. The average hospital stay of the two groups was compared. Harris score of hip joint was followed up after operation. The experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) There was no significant difference in blood loss, blood transfusion rate, blood transfusion volume, and hemoglobin value between the two groups (P > 0.05). (2) There was no significant difference in deep vein thrombosis of both lower limbs between the drainage group (four cases) and the non-drainage group (two cases) (P > 0.05). (3) There were three cases of bleeding, three cases of infection, two cases of swelling and ecchymosis in the drainage group, and one case of bleeding and one case of swelling and ecchymosis in the non-drainage group. There were significant differences in incision complications between the two groups (P < 0.05). (4) Average hospital stay was longer in the drainage group than in the non-drainage group (P < 0.05). (5) There was no significant difference in Harris score of the hip joint between the two groups at 1, 3 and 6 months after operation (P > 0.05). (6) The results showed that there was no need to place drainage tube after intravenous drip of tranexamic acid during total hip arthroplasty.

Key words: bone, joint, prosthesis, tranexamic acid, blood loss, blood transfusion, incision complications, hip function

中图分类号: