中国组织工程研究

• 骨髓干细胞 bone marrow stem cells •    下一篇

全麻下手法复位单侧PVP与常规PVP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的临床对照研究

吴鸿,袁源,刘礼金,严亮,熊力伟,邹志远,闵志海    

  1. 南昌市第三医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-07 出版日期:2015-06-10 发布日期:2015-06-10
  • 作者简介:吴鸿,男,1969年9月出生,医学博士,副主任医师,骨科副主任,专长:老年骨科,详细通信地址:江西省南昌市象山南路2号南昌市第三医院骨科
  • 基金资助:

    南昌市科技支撑计划项目-社会发展技术领域(2014)(项目代码:2014-SFJS-SWYY-002)

The clinical compared research of manual reduction combined with Percutaneous vertebroplasty  through unipedicular approach under general anesthesia and conventional Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression  fractures 

WU Hong, YUAN Yuan,  LIU 了ijng, YAN L, XIONG LW, ZOU ZY,  MIN ZH   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, The third hospital of Nanchang
  • Received:2013-08-07 Online:2015-06-10 Published:2015-06-10
  • Contact: Central Hospital of Xiangyang, Xiangyang 441g, Xiangyang 441021, Hubei Province, China liankai2000@163.com E-mail:liankai2000@163.com

摘要:

目的:探讨全麻下手法复位联合单侧经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)的效果及优势。
方法:2012年7月至2014年12月回顾PVP治疗单椎体OVCF病人53例,A组32例在全麻下先行手法复位,再行单侧椎弓根穿刺,单侧PVP骨水泥注射治疗。B组21例采用常规的PVP操作治疗。
结果:随访时间平均6个月(3-14个月)。1、A组视觉类比评分(VAS)由术前(8.3±0.7)分降至术后(2.1±0.6)分,最终随访(1.9±0.6)分;椎体压缩率由术前(34.2±7.3)%恢复到术后(4.3±2.4)%,最终随访(5.0±2.7)%;后凸Cobb’s角由术前(21.9±3.8)度恢复到术后(8.6 ±1.7)度,最终随访(9.0 ±1.8)度。术前与术后各时间点差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。2、B组视觉类比评分(VAS)由术前(8.1±0.8)分降至术后(2.6±0.5)分,最终随访(2.1±0.5)分;椎体压缩率由术前(35.0±7.6)%恢复到术后(24.3±6.7)%,最终随访(25.2±6.8)%;后凸Cobb’s角由术前(22.0±3.9)度恢复到术后(18.8 ±3.6)度,最终随访(19.3 ±3.7)度。术前与术后各时间点差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。3、A、B两组比较,VAS评分术后比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但两组术后椎体压缩率及后凸Cobb’s角差异则均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。4、A组(15.6 %)与B组(28.6%)相比,骨水泥渗漏率明显降低。
结论:1、全麻下患者疼痛缓解,腰背肌松驰,易于手法复位,手法复位后椎体高度及Cobb’s角恢复更好;2、骨折的椎体手法复位后形成空隙,在行单侧椎弓根穿刺时并不需要特意加大穿刺的内倾角度即可穿入此空隙中,穿刺的安全性更高;3、骨水泥注入骨折复位后形成的空隙内时的注射压力不大,骨水泥不易渗漏,单侧注射即能使骨水泥顺着空隙向对侧弥散,骨水泥形态分布更理想。

关键词: 脊柱骨折, 骨质疏松, 经皮椎体成形术, 复位

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Objective To investigate the effect and preponderance of the method of manual reduction combined with Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) through unipedicular approach under general anesthesia in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Methods  A  retrospectively compared study of 53 cases  with a single vertebral OVCF were performed from July 2012 to December 2014. The group A (32 cases) were treated by manual reduction combined with PVP  through unipedicular approach to inject bone cement in the vertebral bodies of OVCF under general anesthesia. The group B (21 cases ) were treated with conventional PVP . Results  There was an average of 6 months follow-up time (3-14 months).(1) In group A :VAS score descend from (8.3±0.7) points preoperatively to (2.1±0.6) postoperatively, to (1.9 ± 0.6) in the final follow-up; Vertebral compression ratio descend from (34.2 ±7.3) % preoperatively back to (4.3±2.4) % postoperatively, to (5.0 ±2.7) % in the final follow-up; Cobb's Angle descend from (21.9±3.8) degrees preoperatively back to (8.6±1.7) postoperatively, (9.0±1.8) in the final follow-up. There was  significant difference between preoperative and postoperative time point (P < 0.01).(2) In group B:VAS score descend from (8.1±0.8) points preoperatively to (2.6±0.5) postoperatively, to (2.1±0.5) in the final follow-up; Vertebral compression ratio descend from (35.0±7.6) % preoperatively back to( 24.3±6.7) % postoperatively, to (25.2±6.8) % in the final follow-up; Cobb's Angle descend from (22.0±3.9) degrees preoperatively back to (18.8±3.6) postoperatively, (19.3±3.7) in the final follow-up. There was  significant difference between preoperative and postoperative time point (P < 0.01). (3) There was no significant difference in VAS score between two group (P > 0.05). There was  significant difference in postoperative Vertebral compression ratio and Cobb's Angle between two groups (P < 0.01).(4) Group A (15.6%) compared with group B (28.6%), bone cement leakage rate significantly reduced. Conclusion  (1)Under  general anesthesia, because of relief of pain of patient and relaxation of waist and back muscle, manual reduction is  easier, the recovery of height and Cobb's angle of vertebral body is more satisfactory after manual reduction. (2)A gap was formed in the vertebral bodies with OVCF after manual reduction. We doesn't need to increase the  angle of puncture through unipedicular approach when the bone boipsy needle  pierce through the gap, and the security is higher in the process of puncture. (3)The pressure of bone cement injected is not large when bone cement was injected into the gap . The bone cement is not easy to leak, and can diffuse to opposite side. The  distribution of bone cement is more ideal with  PVP  through unipedicular approach .