中国组织工程研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (33): 5356-5360.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.33.019

• 组织构建与生物活性因子 tissue construction and bioactive factors • 上一篇    下一篇

鼠神经生长因子不同给药方式修复周围神经损伤

陈庆真,施明祥,刘盛飞,杜兰翔,厉江群   

  1. 江西中医药大学附属赣州市中医院骨科,江西省赣州市  341000
  • 出版日期:2014-08-13 发布日期:2014-08-13
  • 作者简介:陈庆真,男,1982年生,江西省赣州市人,广州中医药大学毕业,硕士,主治医师,主要从事骨科创伤与关节外科的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    江西赣州市科技局指导性科技计划项目(2012年10月),课题题目:局部应用鼠神经生长因子治疗周围神经损伤的临床研究

Mouse nerve growth factor injection via different ways for treatment of peripheral nerve injury

Chen Qing-zhen, Shi Ming-xiang, Liu Sheng-fei, Du Lan-xiang, Li Jiang-qun   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Ganzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi University of TCM, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi Province, China
  • Online:2014-08-13 Published:2014-08-13
  • About author:Chen Qing-zhen, Master, Attending physician, Department of Orthopedics, Ganzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi University of TCM, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi Province, China
  • Supported by:

    Instructional Technology Projects of Ganzhou Science and Technology Bureau

摘要:

背景:鼠神经生长因子对神经损伤后的修复和再生有促进作用,但目前实验研究表明不同用药方式的作用尚有争议。
目的:评价鼠神经生长因子不同给药方式治疗周围神经损伤的临床疗效。
方法:52例周围神经损伤的患者随机分为2组,试验组27例局部注射鼠神经生长因子;对照组25例全身注射鼠神经生长因子,1次/d,一个疗程4周,比较两组患者神经功能的修复情况及疗效。
结果与结论:与对照组相比,试验组优良率85%(23例),有效率93%(25例);对照组的优良率72%(18例),有效率84%(21例),两组优良率与有效率相比试验组显著优于对照组(P < 0.05)。试验组中13例出现注射部位一过性痛,其中1例患者口服镇痛药物缓解;对照组中12例患者出现注射部位一过性疼痛,未做处理。结果提示,鼠神经生长因子治疗周围神经损伤安全有效,局部注射疗效优于全身用药。



中国组织工程研究
杂志出版内容重点:组织构建;骨细胞;软骨细胞;细胞培养;成纤维细胞;血管内皮细胞;骨质疏松组织工程


全文链接:

关键词: 组织构建, 组织工程, 神经生长因子, 局部注射, 周围神经, 损伤

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Mouse nerve growth factor can promote the repair and regeneration of injured nerves, but current experimental research shows that the effects of different treatment methods are still controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of mouse nerve growth factor injection via different ways on the treatment of peripheral nerve injury.
METHODS: Totally 52 patients with peripheral nerve injury were randomly assigned into two groups: experimental group (local injection of mouse nerve growth factor, n=27) and control group (systemic administration of mouse nerve growth factor, n=25). The treatment was performed once a day, and lasted for 4 weeks. Then, the clinical efficacy and recovery of neurological function were compared.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The good and effective rates were 85% (n=23) and 93% (n=25) in the experimental group, while 72% (n=18) and 84% (n=21) in the control group, respectively, which were significantly better in the experimental group than the control group (P < 0.05). In the experimental group, 13 cases developed transient pain at injection site, including one case of remission undergoing oral analgesics; in the control group, 12 cases had transient pain at injection site, without any treatment. The results suggest that both local and total body injection of mouse nerve growth factor are safe and effective for treatment of peripheral nerve injury, but local injection is superior to systemic administration.



中国组织工程研究
杂志出版内容重点:组织构建;骨细胞;软骨细胞;细胞培养;成纤维细胞;血管内皮细胞;骨质疏松组织工程


全文链接:

Key words: nerve growth factor, peripheral nerves, evoked potentials, motor, evoked potentials, somatosensory

中图分类号: