中国组织工程研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (30): 4824-4828.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.0983

• 药物控释材料 drug delivery materials • 上一篇    下一篇

不同方法构建抗结核β-磷酸三钙药物缓释系统的载药和缓释性能

孙 伟1,薛 骋1,唐先业1,袁 峰1,郭开今1,张 东2,袁君杰2,谢幼专3   

  1. 1徐州医科大学附属医院骨科,江苏省徐州市 221002; 2上海市奉贤区中心医院,上海交通大学附属第六人民医院南院骨科,上海市 201499;3上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院骨科,上海市 200011
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-06 出版日期:2018-10-28 发布日期:2018-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 袁君杰,硕士,医师,上海市奉贤区中心医院,上海交通大学附属第六人民医院南院骨科,上海市 201499
  • 作者简介:孙伟,男,1983年生,江苏省徐州市人,汉族,2014年上海交通大学毕业,博士,主治医师,主要从事脊柱疾患的基础与临床研究。
  • 基金资助:

     徐州市科技创新项目(KC16SY159);江苏省重点研发项目(BE2016647)

The drug loading capacity and controlled drug release property of beta-tricalcium phosphate/rifampicin drug delivery systems constructed by different solution adsorption methods

Sun Wei1, Xue Cheng1, Tang Xian-ye1, Yuan Feng1, Guo Kai-jin1, Zhang Dong2, Yuan Jun-jie2, Xie You-zhuan3   

  1. 1Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221002, Jiangsu Province, China; 2Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital South Campus, Shanghai 201499, China; 3Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2018-07-06 Online:2018-10-28 Published:2018-10-28
  • Contact: Yuan Jun-jie, Master, Physician, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital South Campus, Shanghai 201499, China
  • About author:Sun Wei, MD, Attending physician, Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221002, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Supported by:

    the Scientific Innovation Project of Xuzhou, No. KC16SY159; the Major Research and Development Project of Jiangsu Province, No. BE2016647

摘要:

文章快速阅读:

 

文题释义:
药物缓释系统:是利用对人体无毒、具有较好生物相容性和可降解性的材料作为载体,与药物以物理或化学吸附的方式结合制成一定的剂型,在体内通过扩散或渗透等方式使药物分子以适宜的浓度和可控的速率持续缓慢释放,从而达到更有效治疗疾病的目的。
药物负载法:即将药物负载到载体上的方法,是决定药物缓释系统载药量和缓释效果的关键因素之一。目前常用的药物负载方法有溶液吸附法、搅拌混合法、相分离法、喷雾干燥法、自乳化溶剂扩散法、乳化溶剂挥发法、真空等离子喷涂法和化学结合法等。其中,溶液吸附法较为常用。
 
 
背景:构建药物缓释系统的常用方法静态溶液吸附法、动态溶液吸附法和真空溶液吸附法中,哪种方法可以使单纯多孔β-磷酸三钙载体负载更多的抗结核药物并维持更长的药物释放时间,目前尚不十分清楚。
目的:研究不同溶液吸附法构建的抗结核多孔β-磷酸三钙药物缓释系统的载药性能和体外缓释规律。
方法:分别利用静态溶液吸附法、动态溶液吸附法和真空溶液吸附法将利福平负载于多孔β-磷酸三钙中,比较这3种方法构建的药物缓释系统的载体力学强度、载药性能和药物缓释特性。

结果与结论:①3种不同方法负载利福平后,载体间的力学强度无显著差异(P > 0.05);载体负载利福平后的力学强度与负载前相比,差异均无显著性意义(P > 0.05);②药物缓释系统体外载药实验表明,真空溶液吸附法构建的药物缓释系统单位质量载体的载药量(1.02±0.16) mg/g明显高于静态溶液吸附法(0.79±0.12) mg/g和动态溶液吸附法(0.89±0.13) mg/g(P < 0.05);③体外释放实验表明,通过3种溶液吸附法构建的药物缓释系统其释药均存在突释现象。体外84 h,利福平在真空溶液吸附法、动态溶液吸附法和静态溶液吸附法构建的药物缓释系统中的累积释放百分比分别为(66.82±5.16)%,(79.49±3.50)%和(91.30±5.86)% (P < 0.05),完全释药结束的时间分别为21.5,17.5和14.5 d(P < 0.05);④结果提示,真空溶液吸附法构建的药物缓释系统可以负载更多的利福平并使其更持久的释放,因此,真空溶液吸附法可能更适合用来构建多孔β-磷酸三钙抗结核药物缓释系统。

ORCID: 0000-0002-6444-9523(孙伟)

关键词: 溶液吸附法, 药物缓释, 利福平, β-磷酸三钙, 抗结核药物, 脊柱结核, 力学强度, 载药量

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The drug delivery systems are commonly constructed by vacuum adsorption (VA), dynamic adsorption (DA) and static adsorption. Up to now, there is still no published studies that systematically evaluate the drug loading capacity and controlled drug release property of porous β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds loading rifampicin (RFP) constructed by these three solution adsorption methods.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the drug loading capacity and controlled drug release property of porous β-TCP scaffolds loading RFP constructed by these three solution adsorption methods.
METHODS: The β-TCP/RFP drug delivery systems were constructed by VA, DA and SA, respectively. The mechanical strength of β-TCP, drug loading capacity and controlled drug release property of the three different drug delivery systems were analyzed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) There were no differences in the mechanical strength of β-TCP from VA-DDS, DA-DDS and SA-DDS  (P > 0.05). The mechanical strength of β-TCP in three DDS groups was not significantly different from that of unloading β-TCP (P > 0.05). (2) The in vitro drug loading testing indicated that the unit mass of RFP in VA-DDS [(1.02±0.16) mg/g] was significantly higher than that in SA-DDS [(0.79±0.12) mg/g] or DA-DDS [(0.89±0.13) mg/g] (P < 0.05). (3) The in vitro release study showed an initial burst release of RFP in the three different DDSs within the first 12 hours and after 84 hours. At 84 hours, the cumulative release of RFP from VA-DDS, DA-DDS and SA-DDS was up to (66.82±5.16)%, (79.49±3.50)% and (91.30±5.86%), respectively (P < 0.05). Complete RFP release was observed at 21.5, 17.5 and 14.5 days in VA-DDS, DA-DDS and SA-DDS, respectively (P < 0.05). As the VA-DDS shows highest RFP loading capacity and most sustained drug release, VA is recommended for the construction of porous β-TCP/RFP drug delivery systems.

Key words: Rifampin, Tuberculosis, Spinal, Drug Carriers, Tissue Engineering

中图分类号: