中国组织工程研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (30): 5545-5550.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.30.020

• 骨与关节学术探讨 academic discussion of the bone and joint • 上一篇    下一篇

磁共振成像评价膝关节半月板损伤

冯  磊1,王敬学2,王国华1,宋修峰1,张婷婷3,张  通1   

  1. 1青岛市市立医院影像科,山东省青岛市  266011
    2招远市人民医院放射科,山东省招远市  265400
    3齐鲁石化医院集团中心医院放射科,山东省淄博市  255400
  • 出版日期:2013-07-23 发布日期:2013-07-23
  • 通讯作者: 王国华,博士,主任医师,硕士生导师,青岛市市立医院影像科,山东省青岛市 266011 wangguohua89@163.com
  • 作者简介:冯磊,男,1960年生,辽宁省鞍山市人,满族,1984年青岛医学院医疗系毕业,副主任医师,主要从事骨肌系及胸部CT、MRI诊断研究。 farlylee@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    青岛市科技局立项资助(2009-KJ W005)。

Knee meniscus injury evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging 

Feng Lei1, Wang Jing-xue2, Wang Guo-hua1, Song Xiu-feng1, Zhang Ting-ting3, Zhang Tong1   

  1. 1Department of Radiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao  266011, Shandong Province, China
    2Department of Radiology, Zhaoyuan People’s Hospital, Zhaoyuan  265400, Shandong Province, China
    3Department of Radiology, Central Hospital of Qilu Petro-chemical Hospital Group, Zibo  255400, Shandong Province, China
  • Online:2013-07-23 Published:2013-07-23
  • Contact: Wang Guo-hua, M.D., Chief physician, Master’s supervisor, Department of Radiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China wangguohua89@163.com
  • About author:Feng Lei, Associate chief physician, Department of Radiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China farlylee@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:

    Project of Qingdao Science and Technology Bureau, No. 2009-KJ W005

摘要:

背景:传统的影像学检查方法在膝关节半月板损伤诊断方面有很大的局限性,难以检测膝关节半月板的全部情况。
目的:以磁共振成像评价膝关节半月板损伤。
方法:回顾性分析以往经临床治疗证实的膝关节半月板损伤患者,分析其磁共振成像征象的特征并分级,显示半月板受损情况,与关节镜或手术结果进行对照研究。
结果与结论:膝关节半月板损伤的磁共振成像中,Ⅰ级表现为不与半月板关节面接触的点状或圆形高信号,Ⅱ级表现为半月板内出现水平或斜行的线样或条状高信号影,但未达到半月板关节面缘,Ⅲ级表现为半月板内线条样或复杂形态高信号影延伸至半月板的关节面,可伴有半月板形态的改变。磁共振成像作为一种无创性的检查手段,能清楚地显示半月板变性和撕裂,正确地诊断半月板损伤的部位、形态及严重程度,这对临床确定治疗方案有非常重要的指导价值。

关键词: 骨关节植入物, 骨与关节学术探讨, 膝关节, 半月板损伤, 内侧副韧带, 外侧副韧带, 前交叉韧带, 后交叉韧带, 磁共振成像, 影像学, 并发症

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Conventional imaging method has significant limitations in the diagnosis of knee meniscus injury, which is difficult to detect the full extent of the knee meniscus.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knee meniscus injury with magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS: The knee meniscus injury patients diagnosed with clinical treatment were retrospectively analyzed, and the characteristics of the magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed and graded. Then, the meniscus injury was analyzed and compared with the arthroscopic or surgical results.
RESUTLS AND CONCLUSION: In the magnetic resonance imaging of knee meniscus injury, the Ⅰ level knee meniscus injury was presented as the punctate or round high signal that did not contacted with the surface of the meniscus, Ⅱ level knee meniscus injury was presented as the horizontal or oblique line or strip-like high signal in the meniscus, and Ⅲ level knee meniscus injury was presented as lines and complex high signal in the meniscus that extended to the articular surface of the meniscus, and accompanied with morphological changes of the meniscus. Magnetic resonance imaging, as a noninvasive checking method, can clearly show the meniscal degeneration and tearing, and correctly diagnosed the location, shape and severity of meniscus injury, which has significant guiding value in determine the clinical treatment options.

Key words: bone and joint implants, academic discussion of bone and joint, knee joint, meniscus injury, medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, magnetic resonance imaging, imaging, complications

中图分类号: