中国组织工程研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (26): 6859-6867.doi: 10.12307/2026.382

• 材料生物相容性 material biocompatibility • 上一篇    下一篇

国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极的生物相容性和临床前实验

李宇津1,倪关森2,茅伟青3,汤嘉宇1,李学庆1   

  1. 复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院,1普外科,3护理部,上海市   200240;2上海市第四人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,上海市   200434
  • 接受日期:2025-09-25 出版日期:2026-09-18 发布日期:2026-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 李学庆,主任医师,复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院普外科,上海市 200240
  • 作者简介:李宇津,男,1991年生,山西省大同市人,硕士,主治医师,主要从事甲状腺与乳腺疾病研究。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市闵行区自然科学研究课题资助项目(2022MHZ094),项目负责人:李宇津

Biocompatibility and preclinical experiments of a Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrodes

Li Yujin1, Ni Guansen2, Mao Weiqing3, Tang Jiayu1, Li Xueqing1   

  1. 1Department of General Surgery, 3Department of Nursing, Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2Department of Otolaryngology, Shanghai Fourth People’s Hospital, Shanghai 200434, China
  • Accepted:2025-09-25 Online:2026-09-18 Published:2026-03-12
  • Contact: Li Xueqing, Chief physician, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • About author:Li Yujin, MS, Attending physician, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Research Fund of Minhang District, Shanghai, No. 2022MHZ094 (to LYJ)

摘要:

文题释义:
生物相容性:指材料与生物体(如人体组织、血液或细胞)接触时两者之间产生的相互作用是否安全、无害且可接受的综合性能评价。生物相容性用于衡量一种材料能否在特定应用场景下“友好”地与生物体共存,而不引发毒性、炎症、过敏或排斥反应。在医疗器械研发中,生物相容性是核心评价指标之一,直接决定器械能否进入临床使用。
临床前研究:是指在新型医疗技术或产品进入人体临床试验前,通过实验室(体外)和动物实验对材料安全性、有效性及作用机制进行系统性验证的研究阶段。临床前研究的核心目标是评估产品是否具备进一步临床应用的潜力,并为首次人体试验(FIH)提供科学依据。临床前研究是医疗器械研发中耗时最长、风险控制最严格的环节。

背景:微创外科手术的普及对高频电外科设备提出了更高要求,进口微创钨合金电极具备高切割精度、低组织黏附性以及良好的生物相容性,但高昂的成本限制了它的广泛应用。因此,开展国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极的生物相容性和临床前动物实验,可为国产微创电极的研发提供科学依据。
目的:评估国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极的生物相容性及临床前安全性。
方法:①生物相容性:将L-929细胞与不同浓度(100%,50%,25%,12.5%)的国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极浸提液共培养,通过MTT法评估材料的细胞毒性。以新西兰白兔为实验对象,通过皮内刺激实验评估国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极的皮肤刺激性。以白化豚鼠为实验对象,通过致敏实验评估国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极的皮肤致敏反应。②临床前动物实验:将36只SD大鼠随机分为304不锈钢电极组(n=12)、进口微创钨合金针形电极组(n=12)和国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极组(n=12),分别采用对应的电极切割腹部皮下组织、腹壁肌层,缝合切口,记录电极表面黏附物质量与术中出血量、烟雾形成量。术后14 d,观察切口愈合、脂肪液化与切口组织学形态。
结果与结论:①MTT检测显示,国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极浸提液组细胞存活率均高于80%,无明显的细胞毒性。皮内刺激实验及致敏实验显示,国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极无显著的皮肤刺激或致敏反应。②与304不锈钢电极组相比,国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极组电极表面黏附物质量减少、术中出血量与烟雾形成量增加(P < 0.05);国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极组与进口微创钨合金针形电极组电极表面黏附物质量、术中出血量与烟雾形成量比较差异均无显著性意义(P > 0.05);3组间的切口愈合、脂肪液化与切口不良反应情况比较差异均无显著性意义(P > 0.05)。苏木精-伊红染色显示,3组切口组织均存在轻度炎症细胞浸润,符合正常创伤修复病理进程,未出现异常免疫反应或延迟愈合现象。③结果表明,国产3D打印微创钨合金针形电极具备良好的生物相容性和安全性,整体性能与进口钨针电极相当。
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7655-3918 (李宇津)

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:生物材料;骨生物材料;口腔生物材料;纳米材料;缓释材料;材料相容性;组织工程

关键词: 3D打印, 钨合金, 针形电极, 生物相容性, 细胞毒性, 皮内刺激, 动物实验, 临床前研究

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of minimally invasive surgery has placed higher demands on high-frequency electrosurgical equipment. Imported minimally invasive tungsten alloy electrodes offer high cutting precision, low tissue adhesion, and good biocompatibility, but their high cost limits their widespread application. Therefore, conducting biocompatibility and preclinical animal studies on Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrodes can provide a scientific basis for the research and development of Chinese-made minimally invasive electrodes. 
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the biocompatibility and preclinical safety of Chinese-made 3D-printed tungsten alloy needle-shaped electrodes. 
METHODS: (1) Biocompatibility: L-929 cells were co-cultured with extracts from Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrodes at different concentrations (100%, 50%, 25%, and 12.5%), and the cytotoxicity of the materials was assessed using the MTT assay. Intradermal stimulation experiments were performed on New Zealand white rabbits to evaluate the skin irritation of the Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrodes. Sensitization experiments were performed on albino guinea pigs to evaluate the skin allergic reaction of the Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrodes. (2) Preclinical animal experiments: Thirty-six SD rats were randomly divided into a 304 stainless steel electrode group (n=12), an imported minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrode group (n=12), and a Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrode group (n=12). The corresponding electrodes were used to incise the abdominal subcutaneous tissue and abdominal wall muscle layer. The incisions were sutured, and the amount of adhesion on the electrode surface, intraoperative blood loss, and smoke formation were recorded. Fourteen days after surgery, wound healing, fat liquefaction, and incision histological morphology were observed. 
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) MTT assays showed that the cell survival rate in the extracts from the Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrode groups was above 80%, with no significant cytotoxicity. Intradermal stimulation and sensitization experiments showed that the Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrodes did not cause significant skin irritation or allergic reactions. (2) Compared with the 304 stainless steel electrode group, the Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrode group showed reduced surface adhesion mass and increased intraoperative bleeding and smoke formation (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in surface adhesion mass, intraoperative bleeding, or smoke formation between the Chinese-made and imported 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrode groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in wound healing, fat liquefaction, or adverse wound reactions among the three groups (P > 0.05). Hematoxylin-eosin staining revealed mild inflammatory cell infiltration in the incision tissues of all three groups, consistent with the normal pathological process of wound repair. No abnormal immune response or delayed healing was observed. (3) These results demonstrate that the Chinese-made 3D-printed minimally invasive tungsten alloy needle electrodes exhibit excellent biocompatibility and safety, and their overall performance is comparable to that of imported tungsten needle electrodes.

Key words: 3D printing, tungsten alloy, needle-shaped electrode, biocompatibility, cytotoxicity, intradermal irritation, animal experiment, preclinical study

中图分类号: