Network Meta-analysis of five common dressings in the
treatment of pressure ulcer

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2293

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There are many kinds of dressings for external use in treating pressure ulcer. Selecting a kind of dressing which is convenient, safe and effective can effectively increase the healing rate of pressure ulcer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of five common dressings on the treatment of pressure ulcer.

METHODS: A systematic search of Embase, PubMed, VIP, Elsevier, WanFang and CNKI were carried out with an end-point of July 2018. Randomized controlled trials about the therapeutic effects of different dressings on pressure ulcer were collected. All data were screened, extracted and assessed by two researchers independently. The ADDIS 1.16.8 software was adopted for data analysis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 24 randomized control trials (1201 patients) which involved 5 kinds of dressings were included. The results of network Meta-analysis showed that the effect of hydrocolloid dressing and foam dressing were superior to aseptic gauze and vaseline gauze in treating pressure ulcer (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the therapeutic effect between the resting dressings (P > 0.05). Based on the probability ranking table, the therapeutic effects of five kinds of dressings in pressure ulcer were ranked as follows: hydrocolloid dressing > foam dressing > hydrogel dressing > sterile gauze > vaseline gauze. Hydrocolloid dressing and foam dressing were superior to the other dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcer.

Key words: pressure ulcer, dressing, hydrocolloid dressing, foam dressing, hydrogel dressing, network meta-analysis, biomaterial

CLC Number:

Huang Ruina, Huang Ruijia, Niu Caili, Wen Junmao, Liu Wanjun, Han Hui, Tian Ting, Wu Xiaowan. Network Meta-analysis of five common dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcer[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2020, 24(16): 2614-2619.

Figures/Tables 7

References

[1] NPUAP/EPUAP/PPPIA 2014 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA).Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide.Updated 2014. www.npuap.org/wp-content/ uploads/2014/
[2] ARTICO M, DANTE A, D'ANGELO D, et al. Prevalence, incidence and associated factors of pressure ulcers in home palliative care patients:A retrospective chart review.Palliat Med. 2018;32(1):299-307.
[3] STEVENSON R,COLLINSON M, HENDERSON V, et al. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in community settings:an observational study.Int J Nurs Stud.2013;50(11):1550-1557.
[4] VÉLEZ-DÍAZ-PALLARÉS M, LOZANO-MONTOYA I, ABRAHA I, et al. Nonpharmacologic Interventions to Heal Pressure Ulcers in Older Patients:An Overview of Systematic Reviews (The SENATORONTOP Series).J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015; 16(6):448-469.
[5] CUSHING CA, PHILLIPS LG. Evidence-based medicine: pressure sores.Plast Reconstr Surg.2013;132(6):1720-1732.
[6] BENNETT G, DEALEY C, POSNETT J. The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK.Age Ageing.2004; 33(3):230-235.
[7] THOMAS DR. Does pressure cause pressure ulcers? An inquiry into the etiology of pressure ulcers. J Am Med Dir Assoc.2010;11(6):397-405.
[8] NATIONAL PATIENT SAFETY AGENCY(NPSA).NHS to adopt zero tolerance approach to pressure ulcers. www.npsa.nhs.uk/ corporate/news/nhs-to-adopt-zero- tolerance-appro ch-topressure-ulcers/(accessed 11 January 2018).
[9] STINSON M, GILLAN C, PORTER-ARMSTRONG A. A literature review of pressure ulcer prevention: weight shift activity, cost of pressure care and the role of the OT. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76(4):1-10.
[10] 田金徽,李伦,赵晔,等.网状Meta分析的撰写与报告[J].中国药物评价,2013,30(6):321-323,333.
[11] HIGGINS JP, ALTMAN DG, GØTZSCHE PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:5928.
[12] VAN VALKENHOEF G,TERVONEN T, ZWINKELS T, et al. ADDIS:a decision support system for evidence-based medicine.Decis Support Syst.2013;5:459-475．
[13] ALM A, HORNMARK AM, FALL PA, et al. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh).1989;149:1-10.
[14] XAKELLIS GC, CHRISCHILLES EA. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73: 463-469.
[15] COLWELL JC, FOREMAN MD, TROTTER JP. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.Decubitus.1993;6:28-36.
[16] BANKS V, HARDING KG. Superficial pressure sores: comparing two regimes.J Wound Care.1994;3(1):8-10.
[17] BANKS V, BALE S. The use of two dressings for moderately exuding pressure sores.J Wound Care.1994;3(3):132-134.
[18] BANKS V, BALE SE. Comparing two dressings for exuding pressure sores in community patients.J Wound Care. 1994; 3(4):175-178.
[19] BALE S, SQUIRES D, VARNON T, et al. A comparison of two dressings in pressure sore management.J Wound Care. 1997;6(10):463-466.
[20] THOMAS S, BANKS V, BALE S, et al. A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds. J Wound Care.1997;6(8):383-386.
[21] THOMAS DR, GOODE PS, LAMASTER K, et al. Acemannan hydrogel versus saline dressings for pressure ulcers: a randomized controlled trial.Adv Wound Care. 1998; 11(6): 273-276.
[22] MOTTA G, DUNHAM L, DYE T, et al. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.Ostomy Wound Management.1999;45(10):41-49.
[23] SEELEY J, JENSEN JL, HUTCHERSON J. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.Ostomy Wound Management.1999;45(6):39-44,46-47.
[24] SOPATA M, LUCAK J, CIUPINSKA M. Effect of bacteriological status on pressure ulcer healing in patients with advanced cancer.J Wound Care.2002;11(3):107-110.
[25] HOLLISAZ MT, KHEDMAT H, YARI F. A randomized clinical trial comparing hydrocolloid, phenytoin and simple dressings for the treatment of pressure ulcers.BMC Dermatol. 2004;4: 18.
[26] PAYNE WG, POSNETT J, ALVAREZ O, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of Stage II pressure ulcers.Ostomy Wound Management.2009;55(2):50-55.
[27] IQBAL J, HIRA PR, MARZOUK MM, et al. Pressure sores and myiasis: flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) complicating a decubitus ulcer.Ann Trop Med Parasitol.2011;105:91-94.
[28] 夏艳萍.美皮康敷料治疗Ⅱ期压疮的护理效果观察[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2012,5(10):113-114.
[29] 李秀珑,刘亚平,刘正英,等.美皮康敷料治疗老年患者一、二期压疮疗效观察[J].实用临床医药杂志,2012,16(2):45-47.
[30] 潘秀玲,李颖彬,黄玉珍.美皮康敷料在神经内科治疗Ⅱ期、浅Ⅲ期压疮的疗效观察[J].中国医学工程, 2013, 21(12):158.
[31] 张玲.压疮护理中康惠尔水胶体敷料的应用[J].大家健康(学术版),2014,8(22):306-307.
[32] 唐世春.水胶体敷料用于皮肤破溃Ⅱ期压疮的效果观察[J].航空航天医学杂志,2014,25(5):743-744.
[33] 邓志贞叶小平,黎彩霞,等.伤口小组使用多爱肤敷料治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ期压疮的临床疗效分析[J].国际医药卫生导报, 2015,21(1): 126-128.
[34] 宋培莲.多爱肤标准敷料治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ期压疮的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2015,28(1):104-105.
[35] 唐元春,刘莺,李颖洁.保赫曼泡沫敷料在治疗Ⅲ期压疮中的效果观察[J].心理医生,2016,22(17):224-225.
[36] 代娟.泡沫敷料治疗对Ⅱ期压疮的临床效果观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(55):216.
[37] 何会芹.探究老年人的压疮护理及治疗进展[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(47):9214-9215.
[38] REDELINGS MD, LEE NE. Sorvillo F.Pressure ulcers-mare lethal than we thought.Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005;18(7): 367-372.
[39] 王滢.纳米银活性炭纤维敷料在压疮治疗中的研究[D].上海:第二军医大学,2014.
[40] 崔爱芝.新型伤口敷料在压疮护理中的应用[J].中国社区医师, 2015,31(28):119.
[41] 刘俊玲,陈彤,刘建云,等.纳米银敷料、银离子敷料、磺胺嘧啶银治疗Ⅱ度烧伤的网状Meta分析[J].国外医学(医学地理分册), 2016,37(3):258-262.
[42] 张燕华,柴建华,常洪美,等.水胶体敷料治疗压疮的中文文献Meta分析[J].医疗装备,2016,29(8):1-2.
[43] WALKER RM, GILLESPIE BM, THALIB L, et al. Foam dressings for treating pressure ulcers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10.
[44] SONG F, XIONG T, PAREKH-BHURKE S, et al. Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study.BMJ.2011;343: d4909. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4909.