中国组织工程研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (33): 5407-5412.doi: 10.12307/2022.742

• 骨与关节循证医学 evidence-based medicine of the bone and joint • 上一篇    

关节松动治疗慢性踝关节不稳功能恢复的荟萃分析

尹贻锟1,王佳林2,伍朝明3,孙君志4   

  1. 1广西师范大学体育与健康学院,广西壮族自治区桂林市   541004;2成都体育学院运动医学与健康学院,四川省成都市   610041;3西昌学院体育学院,四川省西昌市   615000;4成都体育学院运动医学与健康研究所,四川省成都市   610041
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-14 接受日期:2021-11-27 出版日期:2022-11-28 发布日期:2022-03-31
  • 通讯作者: 孙君志,博士,正高级实验师,成都体育学院运动医学与健康研究所,四川省成都市 610041
  • 作者简介:尹贻锟,男,1997年生,山东省泰安市人,汉族,广西师范大学在读硕士,主要从事运动康复、运动损伤与预防相关研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划课题(2019YFF0301704),项目名称:竞速类与对抗类冬季项目运动性伤病防治关键技术研究;国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFF0300904),项目名称:冬季潜优势及落后项目国际化训练平台关键技术研究与示范

Joint mobilization treatment for chronic ankle instability function recovery: a meta-analysis

Yin Yikun1, Wang Jialin2, Wu Chaoming3, Sun Junzhi4   

  1. 1School of Sports and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China; 2School of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China; 3School of Physical Education, Xichang University, Xichang 615000, Sichuan Province, China; 4Institute of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2021-10-14 Accepted:2021-11-27 Online:2022-11-28 Published:2022-03-31
  • Contact: Sun Junzhi, MD, Senior experimentalist, Institute of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • About author:Yin Yikun, Master candidate, School of Sports and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program, No. 2019YFF0301704; National Key Research and Development Program, No. 2018YFF0300904

摘要:

文题释义:
慢性踝关节不稳:是指踝关节初次扭伤后引发周围韧带受损、踝背屈减少、本体感觉异常和神经兴奋性降低等症状,而导致踝关节频繁扭伤的现象。
关节松动术:在关节活动可动范围内,治疗师徒手或借助松动带对关节进行活动,调整内关节间位置和松解关节周围软组织,改善关节活动度、缓解疼痛,对调节运动控制和提高日常生活功能等方面具有特别显著的作用。

目的:慢性踝关节不稳的特征表现为不同程度的平衡稳定性下降、本体感觉异常以及背屈活动度受限等症状。关节松动能有效改善关节活动范围、刺激本体感觉的恢复。文章系统性分析关节松动对慢性踝关节不稳患者功能恢复的影响。
方法:对中国知网(CNKI)、PubMed、EBSCO、Web of Science 和Cochrane Library 等电子数据库进行检索,收集关于关节松动干预慢性踝关节不稳的随机对照试验。中文检索词为:关节松动术、松动、慢性踝关节不稳、踝关节不稳;英文检索词为:mobilization with movement、Joint Mobilization、Maitland、Mulligan’s、chronic ankle instability、CAI、ankle instability。检索时间为各数据库建立到2021年6月。按照《Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》当中的“偏倚风险评估”工具对筛选过后的文献进行风险评估,使用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。
结果:①最终纳入符合标准的随机对照试验9篇,共336名受试者。②Meta分析结果显示:关节松动可有效改善慢性踝关节不稳患者的坎伯兰踝关节不稳定工具(CAIT)评分[MD=5.79,95%CI(4.95,6.62),P < 0.000 01];经过单次关节松动干预后,测量踝关节背屈活动度,负重弓步测试[MD=0.93,95%CI(-0.53,2.38),P=0.21]或非承重倾角仪测试[MD=1.53,95%CI(-1.69,4.76),P=0.35]均无明显改善。经过6次关节松动干预后,测量踝关节背屈活动度(负重弓步测试)有显著改善[MD=4.45,95%CI(0.41,8.49),P=0.03];关节松动对平衡功能(星状伸展平衡测试)干预有较好改善效果[MD=6.17,95%CI(3.12,9.23),P < 0.000 01]、尤其对前向和后内向改善最为明显(P < 0.05);但是关节松动未能有效改善慢性踝关节不稳的疼痛[MD=-0.74,95%CI(-2.01,0.53),P=0.25]。③根据不同干预方式进行亚组分析发现,动态关节松动术对踝关节背屈活动(负重弓步测试)的改善效果优于关节松动术。
结论:①关节松动可有效改善踝关节背屈活动度以及平衡能力,但改善疼痛效果不明显,应再进一步研究。②动态关节松动术对踝关节背屈活动度(负重弓步测试)改善优于关节松动术。

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-2177 (尹贻锟) 

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱;骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程

关键词: 关节松动, 慢性踝关节不稳, 踝关节背屈活动度, 平衡, Meta分析

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The characteristics of chronic ankle instability are often manifested as varying degrees of decreased balance and stability, proprioception, and limited dorsiflexion range of motion. Joint mobilization can effectively improve the range of joint motion and stimulate the recovery of proprioception. This article systematically analyzed the effect of joint mobilization on the functional recovery of patients with chronic ankle instability.
METHODS: Electronic databases such as CNKI, PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials on joint mobilization intervention for chronic ankle instability were collected. The key words were “mobilization with movement, joint mobilization, Maitland, Mulligan’s, chronic ankle instability, CAI, ankle instability” in Chinese and English. The search time was from the establishment of the database to June 2021. According to the “Bias Risk Assessment” tool in the Cochrane Intervention System Evaluation Manual, the risk assessment of the selected literature was carried out, and the RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. 
RESULTS: (1) Nine randomized controlled trials involving 336 subjects were finally included. (2) Meta-analysis results showed that joint mobilization could effectively improve the Cumberland ankle instability tool score of chronic ankle instability patients [MD=5.79, 95%CI(4.95, 6.62), P < 0.000 01]. After a single joint mobilization intervention, there was no significant improvement in the ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measured in weight bearing lunge test [MD=0.93, 95%CI(-0.53, 2.38), P=0.21] or non-weight bearing inclinometer test [MD=1.53, 95%CI(-1.69, 4.76), P=0.35]. After six joint mobilization interventions, the ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measured by weight bearing lunge test had been significantly improved [MD=4.45, 95%CI(0.41, 8.49), P=0.03]. Joint mobilization surgery had a better improvement in balance (star excursion balance test) intervention [MD=6.17, 95%CI(3.12, 9.23), P < 0.000 01], especially the forward and backward inward improvement was the most obvious (P < 0.05). However, joint mobilization surgery failed to effectively improve the pain of chronic ankle instability [MD=-0.74, 95%CI(-2.01, 0.53), P=0.25]. (3) A subgroup analysis based on different intervention methods found that dynamic joint mobilization was better than joint mobilization in improving ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (weight bearing lunge test).
CONCLUSION: (1) Joint mobilization can effectively improve the range of motion and balance of the ankle joint, but the effect of improving pain is not obvious, and further research should be done. (2) Mobilization with movement improves ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (weight bearing lunge test) better than joint mobilization. 

Key words: joint mobilization, chronic ankle instability, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, balance, meta-analysis

中图分类号: