中国组织工程研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (34): 5142-5148.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.34.020

• 材料生物相容性 material biocompatibility • 上一篇    下一篇

不同材料修复颅骨缺损的比较

张海防   

  1. 肥城矿业中心医院神经外科,山东省肥城市 271608
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-29 出版日期:2016-08-19 发布日期:2016-08-19
  • 作者简介:张海防,男,1980年生,山东省泰安市人,医师,主要从事临床医疗工作。

Comparison of different materials for skull defect repair

Zhang Hai-fang   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Feicheng Mining Center Hospital, Feicheng 271608, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2016-05-29 Online:2016-08-19 Published:2016-08-19
  • About author:Zhang Hai-fang, Physician, Department of Neurosurgery, Feicheng Mining Center Hospital, Feicheng 271608, Shandong province, China

摘要:

文章快速阅读:

 

文题释义:
颅骨缺损修复材料
:包括自体骨移植、同种异体骨移植、非金属材料的修复、金属材料,非金属骨修复材料主要是有机玻璃及骨水泥、硅橡胶等,金属修复材料主要是钛网。
自体骨移植修复颅骨缺损:①骨诱导性:自体骨中带有骨分化所需的生长因子及骨髓间充质干细胞,可诱导新骨形成;②骨引导性:自体骨天然的多孔间隙结构,为骨细胞的爬行生长提供支架,可引导新骨形成。


背景:目前临床上针对颅脑损伤及颅骨缺损等的修复方法及修复材料多样,临床疗效及不良反应也各不相同。
目的:对比自体骨、同种异体骨、多孔磷酸三钙和钛网修复颅脑缺损的临床效果。
方法:纳入200例颅骨缺损患者,其中男120例,女80例,年龄在18-76岁,采取随机数字表法分为4组,每组50例,分别采用自体骨移植、同种异体骨移植、多孔磷酸三钙、钛网进行修复。对比4组术后并发症情况,随访观察骨性愈合性能。
结果与结论:①骨性愈合功能:植入后9个月,自体骨移植组、钛网组、同种异体骨移植组骨性愈合性能优于多孔磷酸三钙组(P < 0.05),自体骨移植组、钛网组、同种异体骨移植组间骨性愈合性能比较差异无显著性意义;②并发症:自体骨移植组、钛网组并发症发生率低于同种异体骨移植组、多孔磷酸三钙组(P < 0.05),其余组间两两比较差异均无显著性意义;③结果表明:自体骨和钛网修复颅骨缺损具有良好的生物相容性,可促进骨愈合。

ORCID: 0000-0001-9240-1925(张海防)

关键词: 生物材料, 材料相容性, 颅脑损伤修复, 自体骨抑制, 同种异体骨移植, 钛网, 多孔磷酸三钙

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Currently, different methods materials used for craniocerebral injury and skull defect repair have their own clinical efficacy and adverse reactions.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effects of autologous bone, allograft bone, porous tricalcium phosphate and titanium mesh for skull defects.
METHODS: 200 patients with skull defects were selected, including 120 males and 80 females, aged from 18-76 years old, and then were allotted into four groups by random number table (n=50 per group), undergoing repair with autologous bone, allograft bone, porous tricalcium phosphate and titanium mesh, respectively. The postoperative complications were compared among groups, and osseous healing properties were observed through the follow-up.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The healing property of autologous bone, allograft bone and titanium mesh was significantly superior to that of porous tricalcium phosphate (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences amorg the autologous bone, allograft bone and titanium mesh groups. In addition, the incidence of complications of autologous bone and titanium mesh goup was significantly less than that of porous tricalcium phosphate and allograft bone groups (P < 0.05), and comparison between the latter two groups showed no significant difference. In conclusion, autologous bone and titanium mesh for skull defect repair have good biocompatibility, and can promote bone healing.

Key words: Bone Transplantation, Titanium, Calcium Phosphates, Tissue Engineering

中图分类号: