中国组织工程研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (13): 1976-1982.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2045

• 脂肪干细胞 adipose-derived stem cells • 上一篇    下一篇

多种物理方法分离脂肪源基质血管组分细胞的比较

卢沛伶1,冯春朝1,梁淼淼1,魏嘉田1,黄  婧1,蔡海明1,巫国辉2,张玲华1,聂云飞2   

  1. 1广东省农业生物蛋白质功能与调控重点实验室,华南农业大学生命科学学院,广东省广州市  510642;2广州中家医家庭医生整形美容医院,广东省广州市  510011
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-29 修回日期:2019-05-30 接受日期:2019-07-15 出版日期:2020-05-08 发布日期:2020-03-07
  • 通讯作者: 通讯作者:聂云飞,硕士,医师,广州中家医家庭医生整形美容医院,广东省广州市 510011 并列通讯作者:张玲华,博士,教授,广东省农业生物蛋白质功能与调控重点实验室,华南农业大学生命科学学院,广东省广州市 510642
  • 作者简介:卢沛伶,女,1998年生,四川省资阳市人,汉族,华南农业大学生命科学学院本科在读,主要从事免疫抗衰老方向研究。 并列第一作者:冯春朝,男,1995年生,河南省安阳市人,汉族,同济大学医学院在读硕士,主要从事免疫学方向研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家级大学生创新创业训练计划(201810564021);广东省自然科学基金(2018A030313625)

Separation of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells by a variety of physical methods: a comparative study

Lu Peiling1, Feng Chunchao1, Liang Miaomiao1, Wei Jiatian1, Huang Jing1, Cai Haiming1, Wu Guohui2, Zhang Linghua1, Nie Yunfei2   

  1. 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong Province, China; 2Guangzhou Plastic Surgery Hospital of Chinese Family Physician, Guangzhou 510011, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2019-05-29 Revised:2019-05-30 Accepted:2019-07-15 Online:2020-05-08 Published:2020-03-07
  • Contact: Nie Yunfei, Master, Physician, Guangzhou Plastic Surgery Hospital of Chinese Family Physician, Guangzhou 510011, Guangdong Province, China Zhang Linghua, MD, Professor, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong Province, China
  • About author:Lu Peiling, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong Province, China Feng Chunchao, Master candidate, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong Province, China Lu Peiling and Feng Chunchao contributed equally this work.
  • Supported by:
    the National Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students of China, No. 201810564021; the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, No. 2018A030313625

摘要:

文题释义:

脂肪源基质血管组分:是指来源于脂肪组织的基质血管组分细胞,它广泛存在于脂肪组织中,主要包含脂肪来源干细胞、内皮祖细胞、造血干细胞、抗炎细胞、T细胞等混合细胞成分。由于它相对较易获取且对供体不会造成过大的损伤,同时可以避免细胞培养等优点,被认为是干细胞医学良好的细胞来源。

物理方法:酶解法为国际公认的富集基质血管组分的方法,但加入了外源性消化物质,国际上不允许用于临床试验,故使用不加入外源消化物质的物理方法获取基质血管组分即成为了研究的主要方向。

背景:脂肪源基质血管组分和脂肪源性干细胞在组织工程中的应用受到越来越多科研工作者的关注。当前,分离脂肪源基质血管组分的方法主要有酶解法和推注法,但这两种方法都存在着不容忽视的缺点。

目的:寻找一种更加高活性、安全、简便的制备脂肪源基质血管组分的方法。

方法:以无任何处理的脂肪组织为阴性对照,酶解法为阳性对照,通过细胞量、存活率、细胞碎片、细胞活性、增殖率等指标来比较酶解法、普通推注法、改良推注法、玻璃珠破碎法(简称玻璃珠法)及内置式超声波破碎法(简称内置超声波法)的差异。酶解法及普通推注法为目前分离脂肪源基质血管组分细胞普遍使用的方法;改良推注法是在普通推注法的基础上进行改良后得到的方法;玻璃珠法是利用玻璃珠震荡产生的剪切力,在脂肪颗粒中加入玻璃珠后在2 500 r/min的条件下震荡9 min以制备基质血管组分细胞;内置超声波法则是利用空化效应,在25 W的功率下对脂肪组织处理36 s以获得基质血管组分细胞。

结果与结论:①5种方法获得的基质血管组分细胞的大小差异无显著性意义(P > 0.05);②阴性对照组细胞活性最低,酶解法细胞活性最高,酶解法、玻璃珠法及内置超声波法的细胞活性高于改良推注法和普通推注法(P < 0.05);③酶解法、玻璃珠法及内置超声波法的细胞存活率、细胞增殖率高于改良推注法和普通推注法   (P < 0.05);④酶解法、玻璃珠法及内置超声波法细胞碎片比例、细胞凋亡率要远远低于普通推注法和改良推注法(P < 0.05);⑤结果表明,玻璃珠法和内置超声波法富集基质血管组分细胞的效果优良,但玻璃珠法加入了外源物质进行处理,增加了污染的风险,而内置超声波法尽管将超声探头插入脂肪组织中,但只要将超声探头彻底灭菌,即可将污染风险降到最小。总的来说,内置超声波法和玻璃珠法优于普通推注法及改良推注法。

ORCID: 0000-0003-1692-6038(张玲华)

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:干细胞;骨髓干细胞;造血干细胞;脂肪干细胞;肿瘤干细胞;胚胎干细胞;脐带脐血干细胞;干细胞诱导;干细胞分化;组织工程

关键词: 物理方法, 基质血管组分细胞, 脂肪组织, 超声波, 细胞活力, 玻璃珠, 细胞碎片率, 细胞增殖率

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Increasing attention has been paid to vascular components of the adipose-derived matrix and adipose-derived stem cells in tissue engineering. Existing methods for separating the vascular components of the adipose-derived matrix mainly include enzymatic and bolus injection, both of which have fatal disadvantages. 

OBJECTIVE: To search for a method for preparing adipose-derived stromal vascular fractions with high efficiency, safety, and simplicity.

METHODS: The group without any treatment was used as the negative control, and the enzymatic hydrolysis method served as the positive control. The enzymatic hydrolysis method, traditional bolus method, modified bolus method, glass beads method and built-in ultrasonic waves method were compared through cell volume, survival rate, cell fragments, cell viability, increment rate and detection of microbial infection. The enzymatic hydrolysis method and the common bolus injection method were commonly used in the separation of vascular component cells of the fat source matrix; the improved bolus method was a method obtained by improving on the basis of the ordinary bolus method; the glass bead method was to use the glass bead to oscillate. The shear force generated was obtained by adding glass beads to the fat granules and shaking at 2 500 r/min for 9 minutes to prepare stromal vascular fraction cells. Using the built-in ultrasonic method, adipose tissue was treated at 25 W for 36 seconds to obtain stromal vascular fraction cells through a cavitation effect. 

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The size of stromal vascular fraction cells isolated by five methods showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). (2)The cell viability was lowest in the negative control group, and highest in the enzymatic hydrolysis group. The cell viability in the enzymatic hydrolysis, glass bead, and built-in ultrasonic wave groups was significantly higher than that in the modified and traditional bolus groups (P < 0.05). (3) The cell survival rate and cell proliferation rate in the enzymatic hydrolysis, glass bead, and built-in ultrasonic wave groups were significantly higher than those in the modified and traditional bolus groups (P < 0.05). (4) The cell fragmentation rate and cell apoptosis rate in the enzymatic hydrolysis, glass bead, and built-in ultrasonic wave groups were significantly lower than those in the modified and traditional bolus groups (P < 0.05). (5) These results indicate that the built-in ultrasonic method and the glass bead method are better in enriching vascular components of the adipose-derived matrix. But glass bead method adds exogenous products, so it increases the risk of pollution. Built-in ultrasonic method inserts the ultrasound probe into the adipose tissue, but as long as the ultrasound probe is thoroughly sterilized, the risk of contamination is minimized. In general, the built-in ultrasonic method and the glass bead method are superior to modified and traditional bolus methods.

Key words: physical methods, stromal vascular fraction cells, adipose tissue, ultrasonic wave, cell viability, glass bead, cell fragmentation rate, cell proliferation rate

中图分类号: