Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2016, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (46): 6893-6898.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.46.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of alendronate sodium versus hormone replacement therapy for osteoporosis

Su Fan1, Lin Jing-xia2, Wu Li-qiu3, Cai Dong-mei1, Zhuang Ze4   

  1. 1Department of Osteoporosis, 2Department of Blood Transfusion, 3Department of Prevention and Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China; 4Department of Joint and Traumatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2016-08-26 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2016-11-11
  • Contact: Zhuang Ze, Master, Attending physician, Department of Joint and Traumatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
  • About author:Su Fan, Physician, Department of Osteoporosis, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Estrogen, bisphosphonates, and calcitonin have been shown to improve bone density and decrease fracture rate, among which, alendronate sodium is the most commonly used and gains extensive attention.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcomes of alendronate sodium and hormone replacement therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. 
METHODS: 198 cases of postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly divided into two groups (n=99 per group), and then respectively given the oral administration of alendronate sodium, 70 mg weekly, continuous for 1 year, and the oral treatment of tibolone tablets (hormone replacement therapy group),
2.5 mg/d, for 1 consecutive year. The bone density and sex hormone levels before and after treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions and the levels of bone turnover makers were compared between two groups. Furthermore, visual analogue scale scores were detected.
RESULTS AND CONSLUSION: The bone densities of the femoral neck and L1-4 were significantly improved in both groups after treatment (P < 0.05). The hormone replacement therapy significantly decreased the serum levels of estradiol and progesterone, and significantly increased the cortisol level  (P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale scores in the alendronate sodium group were significantly superior to those in the hormone replacement therapy group (P < 0.05). Alendronate sodium significantly decreased serum levels of procollagen type I N-terminal peptide and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen, as well as significantly increased alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin compared with the hormone replacement therapy (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions, such as nausea and fatigue, in the hormone replacement therapy group was higher than that in the alendronate sodium group (P < 0.05). These results suggest that alendronate sodium and hormone replacement therapies both can markedly improve the bone density and promote osteogenesis; in contrast, alendronate sodium exerts little influence on hormone levels and slight adverse reactions, achieving better treatment outcomes.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:组织构建;骨细胞;软骨细胞;细胞培养;成纤维细胞;血管内皮细胞;骨质疏松组织工程

Key words: Hormone Replacement Therapy, Postmenopause, Osteoporosis, Bone Density, Tissue Engineering

CLC Number: