中国组织工程研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (33): 7063-7071.doi: 10.12307/2025.856

• 骨与关节有限元分析Finite element analysis of bones and joints • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂髋臼双柱骨折4种不同内固定方式的有限元分析

徐  鑫1,乌日开西·艾依提1,吕  刚2,买买艾力·玉山2,马志强2,马  超2   

  1. 1新疆大学,智能制造现代产业学院(机械工程学院),新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市   830017;2新疆医科大学附属中医医院骨一科,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市   830099
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-08 接受日期:2024-11-09 出版日期:2025-11-28 发布日期:2025-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 乌日开西·艾依提,博士,教授,新疆大学,智能制造现代产业学院(机械工程学院),新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 830017 吕刚,主任医师,教授,新疆医科大学附属中医医院骨一科,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 830099
  • 作者简介:徐鑫,男,1998年生,河南省商丘市人,汉族,新疆大学在读硕士,主要从事3D打印技术方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区科学技术厅,天山英才-科技创新领军人才项目(2023TSYCLJ0034),项目负责人:吕刚

Finite element analysis of four different internal fixation methods for complex acetabular double-column fractures

Xu Xin1, Wurikaixi·Aiyiti1, Lyu Gang2, Maimaiaili·Yushan2, Ma Zhiqiang2, Ma Chao2   

  1. 1College of Intelligent Manufacturing Modern Industry (School of Mechanical Engineering), Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China; 2First Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830099, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2024-10-08 Accepted:2024-11-09 Online:2025-11-28 Published:2025-04-12
  • Contact: Wurikaixi·Aiyiti, PhD, Professor, College of Intelligent Manufacturing Modern Industry (School of Mechanical Engineering), Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China Lyu Gang, Chief physician, Professor, First Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830099, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • About author:Xu Xin, Master candidate, College of Intelligent Manufacturing Modern Industry (School of Mechanical Engineering), Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • Supported by:
    Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Science and Technology Department, Tianshan Talents-Leading Talents in Science and Technology Innovation Project, No. 2023TSYCLJ0034 (to LG)

摘要:


文题释义:

复杂髋臼双柱骨折:是指前、后柱均存在骨折的一种髋关节创伤,髋臼关节面与中轴骨失去连接导致“漂浮髋臼”,复位失去参照,治疗难度大,并发症发生率高,严重影响患者的生活质量。双柱骨折均可能累及到方形区,方形区位于髋臼内表面,骨质薄弱,因此选择合适的内固定方式治疗髋臼双柱骨折尤为重要。
有限元分析:是一种数值计算方法,它会将较为复杂的数学模型如载荷、材料、结构和力学性能等,划分为有限个简单的单元,再利用数学模型和近似方法进行计算分析,从而得出问题的近似解。


背景:髋臼双柱骨折类型复杂且常见,目前治疗髋臼双柱骨折多采用传统重建接骨板,其与骨面的不匹配性会加大手术难度。个性化接骨板能够实现接骨板与骨面贴合,但个性化接骨板与传统重建接骨板固定髋臼双柱骨折的生物力学对比研究较少,且模拟的体位姿态较为单一。

目的:采用三维有限元方法分析复杂髋臼双柱骨折不同内固定方式在各种体位下的生物力学特性,为临床应用提供必要的生物力学依据。
方法:建立累及方形区的复杂髋臼骨折中最具代表性的双柱骨折模型,在此基础上建立异形个性化钛板固定(A组)、前后柱双钛板固定(B组)、前柱重建钛板+后柱拉力螺钉固定(C组)和前柱重建钛板+髋臼下螺钉固定(D组)4种不同内固定方式固定复杂髋臼双柱骨折的三维有限元模型,分别模拟静坐、站立、患侧前伸、患侧外展以及患侧单腿站立体位下对4种复杂髋臼双柱骨折模型进行有限元分析,比较4种内固定方式的生物力学性能差异。

结果与结论:①在各种体位下,骨折线上节点位移以及平均位移均表现为A组<B组<C组<D组,在患侧单腿站立体位下的位移值相较于其他体位最大,且A组内固定系统最大位移在4组模型中最小;各节点位移在站立和患侧单腿站立体位时,4组之间无统计学差异(P > 0.05);在静坐、患侧前伸和患侧外展体位下,A组与B组、B组与C组、C组与D组无统计学差异(P > 0.05),A组与C组、A组与D组、B组与D组之间差异有显著性意义(P < 0.05);②A组各个骨折块所受最大应力相较于其他组更小,且骨折块所受应力分布更加均匀;内固定物应力主要集中于接骨板在骨折断端附近区域,其中A、B组内固定方式应力分布较为均匀,C、D组内固定方式应力集中较为明显,且A组相较于其他3组内固定物最大应力值减小了4.86%-54.61%;③在患侧前伸和患侧外展体位下,A、B组均具有较大的应力遮挡率,两组最大差值为5.67%;在患侧单腿站立体位下,A组内固定应力遮挡率最高,而D组应力遮挡率最小;④提示异形个性化钛板固定(A组)相较于其他3组传统重建接骨板固定具有更好的生物力学稳定性。

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3507-4060 (徐鑫) 

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱;骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程

关键词: 异形个性化钛板, 传统重建接骨板, 髋臼双柱骨折, 骨折内固定, 多体位, 位移, 应力, 有限元分析, 生物力学

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The types of acetabular double-column fractures are complex and common. At present, the traditional reconstructed bone plates are used to treat the double-column fractures, and the mismatch between them and the bone surface will increase the difficulty of surgery. Personalized bone plate can realize the adhesion of bone plate and bone surface, but the biomechanical comparison between personalized bone plate and traditional reconstructed bone plate in fixation of acetabular double column fracture is few, and the simulated posture is relatively simple.
OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional finite element method was used to analyze the biomechanical characteristics of different internal fixation methods of complex acetabular double-column fractures in various positions, providing the necessary biomechanical basis for clinical application.
METHODS: The most representative two-column fracture model of complex acetabular fractures involving square area was established. A three-dimensional finite element model was established for the fixation of complex acetabular double-column fractures by four different internal fixation methods: special-shaped titanium plate fixation (group A), anterior and posterior column double titanium plate fixation (group B), anterior column reconstruction titanium plate + posterior column lag screw fixation (group C), and anterior column reconstruction titanium plate + subacetabular screw fixation (group D). Four kinds of complicated acetabular double-column fracture models with different internal fixation were simulated in the position of sitting, standing, affected side extension, affected side abduction, and affected side standing on one leg. The biomechanical properties of the four internal fixation methods were compared.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The node displacement and mean displacement on fracture line were presented as group A < group B < group C < group D in all postures. The displacement value in the one-leg standing position on the affected side was the largest compared with other postures, and the maximum displacement of the internal fixation system in group A was the smallest among the four models. There was no significant difference between the four groups in the standing position and the one-legged standing position (P > 0.05). In the position of sitting, affected side extension, and affected side abduction, there was no significant difference between group A and group B, group B and group C, and group C and group D (P > 0.05), but there was significant difference between group A and group C, group A and group D, and group B and group D (P < 0.05). (2) The maximum stress of each fracture block in group A was smaller than that in other groups, and the stress distribution of fracture block was more uniform. The stress of the internal fixator was mainly concentrated in the area near the fracture end of the bone plate. The stress distribution of the internal fixator was more uniform in groups A and B, while the stress concentration of the internal fixator in groups C and D was more obvious, and the maximum stress value of the internal fixator in group A decreased by 4.86%-54.61% compared with the other three groups. (3) In the affected side extension and abduction position, both groups A and B had a large stress shielding rate, and the maximum difference between the two groups was 5.67%. In the one-legged standing position on the affected side, the internal fixed stress shielding rate of group A was the highest, while that of group D was the lowest. (4) It is indicated that shaped personalized titanium plate fixation (group A) has better biomechanical stability than the other three groups of traditional reconstructed bone plate fixation.

Key words: shaped personalized titanium plate, traditional reconstructive plate, acetabular double column fracture, fracture internal fixation, multi-position, displacement, stress, finite element analysis, biomechanics

中图分类号: