Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the cantilever fixed bridge supported by implants with different shapes

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2017.30.013

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The shape of the implant exerts an effect on its biomechanics. At present, the research of implant-supported fixed partial denture with cantilever extension mainly focuses on the same shape, and little is reported on the comparison and analysis of implant-supported fixed partial denture with cantilever extension supported by different shape implants.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical behaviors of cantilever fixed bridges which were supported by three different implants, including cylindrical implant, tapered implant, expandable implant, in the mandibular posterior region with the help of three-dimensional finite element analysis.

METHODS: The three-dimensional finite element models of the cantilever fixed bridges which were supported by cylindrical implant, tapered implant and expandable implant and their surrounding tissue in the mandibular posterior region were established were established. The force of 300 N was applied to the cantilever fixed bridges with axial 90° and buccolingual 45° to evaluate the maximum von Mises stress (Max EQV stress) of cortical bone and cancellous bone and the maximum displacement in implant-abutment complex.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Under axial and buccolingual loads, the Max EQV stress in the cortical bone was higher than that in the cancellous bone. The cantilever fixed bridge which was supported by expandable implant had the lowest Max EQV stress in the cortical bone, especially under axial load, and exhibited the highest Max EQV stress in the cancellous bone. The cantilever fixed bridges supported by three different implants showed an increase in the Max EQV stress of the cortical bone and cancellous bone and the maximum displacement in implant-abutment complex under buccolingual load. The cantilever fixed bridge which was supported by expandable implant had the minimum maximum displacement in the buccolingual direction. To conclude, the cantilever fixed bridge which is supported by expandable implant has best stability.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：生物材料；骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性；组织工程

Key words: Finite Element Analysis, Dental Implants, Dental Stress Analysis, Tissue Engineering

CLC Number:

R318

','1');return false;" target="_blank">

R318

Wang Jun-zheng, Wang Qi-bo, Ding Chao, Shi Jiu-hui.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the cantilever fixed bridge supported by implants with different shapes

[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2017, 21(30): 4830-4835.

Figures/Tables 4

References

[1] 钱姝娇,赖红昌.种植体支持式单端固定桥的临床应用与研究进展[J].口腔材料器械杂志, 2015,24(3):151-156.

[2] 张震,李影,陈菲,等.悬臂梁式种植固定义齿的回顾性研究[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2013, 23(2):116-119.

[3] Cook SD,Barbera J,Rubi M,et al.Lumbosacral fixation using expandable pedicle screws: an alternative in reoperation and osteoporosis.Spine J.2001;1(2):109-114.

[4] Lemon M,Somayaji HS,Khaleel A,et al. Fragility fractures of the ankle:stabilisation with an expandable calcaneotalotibial nail.J Bone Joint Surg.2005;87(6):809-813.

[5] Kummer FJ,Strauss EJ,Jaffe WL.Evaluation of an expandable stem total hip replacement system.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis.2007; 65(2):101-105.

[6] Tsolaki IN,Madianos PN,Vrotsos JA.Outcomes of dental implants in osteoporotic patients. A literature review.J Prosthodont. 2009;18(4):309-323.

[7] Bostan B,Esenkaya I,Gunes T,et al.A biomechanical comparison of polymethylmethacrylate-reinforced and expansive pedicle screws in pedicle-screw revisions.Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc.2009;43(3):272-276.

[8] 赵铱民.口腔修复学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012.

[9] Tada S,Stegaroiu R,Kitamura E,et al.Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2003;18(3):357-368.

[10] Koka P,Mohapatra A,Anandapandian PA,et al.The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.Indian J Dent Res. 2012; 23(2):129-134.

[11] 刘川,李迎春,肖剑锐,等.圆柱形、根端带缝及膨胀式种植体在骨质疏松状态时生物力学比较的三维有限元分析[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2011,27(4):450-454.

[12] Kitamura E,Stegaroiu R,Nomura S,et al.Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant–a three‐dimensional finite element analysis.J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32(4):279-286.

[13] Eskitascioglu G,Usumez A,Sevimay M,et al.The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone:a three-dimensional finite element study.J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(2):144-150.

[14] Baggi L,Cappelloni I,Maceri F,et al.Stress-based performance evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants by finite-element simulation.Comput Math Methods Med. 2008; 16(8):971-987.

[15] Ujigawa K,Kato Y,Kizu Y,et al.Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of zygomatic implants in craniofacial structures.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2007;36(7):620-625.

[16] Malhotra AO,Padmanabhan TV,Mohamed K,et al.Load transfer in tilted implants with varying cantilever lengths in an all-on-four situation.Aust Dent J. 2012;57(4):440-445.

[17] 吕佳,刘翠玲,蓝菁,等.动态载荷下种植体位置和直径对悬臂梁种植固定义齿应力影响的三维有限元研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2013,31(6):552-556.

[18] Wang C,Li Q,McClean C,et al.Numerical simulation of dental bone remodeling induced by implant‐supported fixed partial denture with or without cantilever extension. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng.2013;29(10):1134-1147.

[19] Geng JP,Tan KBC,Liu GR.Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.J Prosthet Dent.2001;85(6):585-598.

[20] 黄珊,唐亮,潘燕环,等.下颌后牙单端桥基牙骨支持组织应力的动力学分析[J].中国病理生理杂志,2012,28(3):524-527.

[21] 王宏仁,李爱洁,陈新民.种植支持式单端固定桥斜向集中载荷下的三维位移[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2013,30(3):141-145.

[22] 吕正辉. 单端固定桥修复下颌游离端缺牙的光弹性分析[D].第四军医大学,2007.

[23] Huré G,Aguado E,Grizon F,et al.Some biomechanical and histologic characteristics of early-loaded locking pin and expandable implants: a pilot histologic canine study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2004;6(1):33-39.

[24] Pierrisnard L,Hure G,Barquins M,et al.Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: A finite element analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2002;17(3):353-362．

[25] Lei W,Wu Z.Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae.Eur Spine J. 2006;15(3): 321-326.

[26] Jo HY,Hobo PK,Hobo S.Freestanding and multiunit immediate loading of the expandable implant: an up-to-40-month prospective survival study.J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(2):148-155.

[27] Wan SY,Lei W,Wu ZX,et al.Micro-CT evaluation and histological analysis of screw-bone interface of expansive pedicle screw in osteoporotic sheep.Chin J Traumatol. 2008;11(2):72-77.

[28] Franck WM,Olivieri M,Jannasch O,et al.Expandable nail system for osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: preliminary results.J Trauma.2003;54(6):1152-1158.

[29] Zurdo J,Romao C,Wennström JL.Survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(s4):59-66.

[30] Polis B,Krawczyk J,Polis L,et al.Percutaneous extrapedicular vertebroplasty with expandable intravertebral implant in compression vertebral body fracture in pediatric patient-technical note.Childs Nerv Syst. 2016;32(11): 2225-2231.

[31] Siemionow K,Janusz P,Phillips FM,et al.Clinical and Radiographic Results of Indirect Decompression and Posterior Cervical Fusion for Single-Level Cervical Radiculopathy Using an Expandable Implant with 2-Year Follow-Up.J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2016; 77(6):482-488.

[32] Agusti A,Ward A,Montgomery C,et al.Aesthetic and oncologic outcomes after one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using a permanent biodimensional expandable implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.2016;69(2):211-220.

[33] Renaud C.Treatment of vertebral compression fractures with the cranio-caudal expandable implant SpineJack®: Technical note and outcomes in 77 consecutive patients.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.2015;101(7):857-859.