Comparison of Mg-Li-Gd alloy and stainless steel intramedullary nail for fixation of femoral annular hemi-defects in rats

doi:10.12307/2025.894

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: With the increasing demand for orthopedic implants, the search for materials with good biocompatibility and degradability has become a research hotspot. Magnesium-lithium-gadolinium (Mg-Li-Gd) alloy has good degradability, biocompatibility, and mechanical properties, providing ideal supporting conditions for fracture healing.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of Mg-Li-Gd alloy implants on bone healing in rats.
METHODS: A circular half-defect model was made on the lateral side of the right mid-femoral segment in 28 SD rats, and the rats were randomly divided into two groups. The stainless steel group was fixed with a stainless steel intramedullary nail, and the magnesium alloy group was fixed with an Mg-Li-Gd alloy intramedullary nail, with 14 rats in each group. At 2, 8, and 14 weeks after surgery, right femur X-ray and Micro-CT examinations, as well as hematoxylin-eosin staining, immunohistochemical staining, and western blot assay were performed.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) X-ray film: At 2 weeks after surgery, the osteotomy lines of both groups were clear, the density of the intramedullary nail in the magnesium alloy group was close to that of bone tissue, and the density of the intramedullary nail in the stainless steel group was higher than that of bone tissue. At 8 weeks after surgery, the osteotomy lines of both groups were blurred, and the intramedullary nail in the magnesium alloy group had corroded and degraded. At 14 weeks after surgery, the osteotomy lines of both groups disappeared, and the intramedullary nail in the magnesium alloy group further corroded and degraded. (2) Micro-CT: At 2 weeks after surgery, callus began to form in both groups; 8 weeks after surgery, the stainless steel group entered the callus remodeling stage, and a relatively dense bone structure was formed at the bone defect site, and the magnesium alloy group showed obvious callus hyperplasia at the bone defect site. At 14 weeks after surgery, the stainless steel group showed a mature bone remodeling process, and thick cortical bone was formed at the bone defect site, and thinner cortical bone was formed in the magnesium alloy group. (3) Hematoxylin-eosin staining: At 2 weeks after surgery, a large number of osteoblasts, osteocytes, a small number of osteoclasts and trabecular structures were observed in the magnesium alloy group, while relatively few osteoblasts and osteocytes were observed in the stainless steel group. At 8 weeks after surgery, a large number of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and mature trabecular structures were observed in the magnesium alloy group, while a large number of osteocytes and lamellar bones were observed in the stainless steel group. At 14 weeks after surgery, lamellar bones were observed in the magnesium alloy group, while mature bone tissue was observed in the stainless steel group. (4) Immunohistochemical staining and western blot assay: At the same time point, the expression levels of bone morphogenetic protein 2, osteocalcin, and RUNX2 proteins in the magnesium alloy group were higher than those in the stainless steel group. (5) The results showed that compared with stainless steel materials, Mg-Li-Gd alloy had no obvious advantage in promoting the formation of fracture healing structure.

Key words: magnesium alloy, bone defect, biocompatibility, degradable material, bone healing, Mg-Li-Gd alloy, femoral annular hemi-defect model, bone mineralization

CLC Number:

Wang Jingshuai, Zhang Xiaotong, Zhang Yange, Wan Zedong, Kong Lingwei, Cao Haiying, Jin Yu. Comparison of Mg-Li-Gd alloy and stainless steel intramedullary nail for fixation of femoral annular hemi-defects in rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2025, 29(34): 7261-7268.

Figures/Tables 10

References

[1] FOESSL I, DIMAI HP, OBERMAYER-PIETSCH B. Long-term and sequential treatment for osteoporosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023;19(9):520-533.
[2] AYERS C, KANSAGARA D, LAZUR B, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Treatments to Prevent Fractures in People With Low Bone Mass or Primary Osteoporosis: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2023; 176(2):182-195.
[3] MIRAMINI S, ZHANG L, RICHARDSON M, et al. Influence of fracture geometry on bone healing under locking plate fixations: A comparison between oblique and transverse tibial fractures. Med Eng Phys. 2016; 38(10):1100-1108.
[4] FAN L, CHEN S, YANG M, et al. Metallic materials for bone repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(3):e2302132.
[5] AMUKARIMI S, MOZAFARI M. Biodegradable magnesium-based biomaterials: An overview of challenges and opportunities. MedComm (2020). 2021;2(2):123-144.
[6] INNES MB, ATWATER AR. Orthopedic Implant Hypersensitivity Reactions: Concepts and Controversies. Dermatol Clin. 2020;38(3):361-369.
[7] ANTONIAC I, MICULESCU M, MĂNESCU PĂLTÂNEA V, et al. Magnesium-Based Alloys Used in Orthopedic Surgery. Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(3):1148.
[8] DE RUITER L, RANKIN K, BROWNE M, et al. Decreased stress shielding with a PEEK femoral total knee prosthesis measured in validated computational models. J Biomech. 2021;118:110270.
[9] CHAKRABORTY BANERJEE P, AL-SAADI S, CHOUDHARY L, et al. Magnesium Implants: Prospects and Challenges. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(1):136.
[10] NASR AZADANI M, ZAHEDI A, BOWOTO OK, et al. A review of current challenges and prospects of magnesium and its alloy for bone implant applications. Prog Biomater. 2022;11(1):1-26.
[11] KUAH KX, WIJESINGHE S, BLACKWOOD DJ. Toward understanding in vivo corrosion: Influence of interfacial hydrogen gas build-up on degradation of magnesium alloy implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2023;111(1):60-70.
[12] FAN L, CHEN S, YANG M, et al. Metallic Materials for Bone Repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(3):e2302132.
[13] LI J, ZHOU P, WANG L, et al. Investigation of Mg-xLi-Zn alloys for potential application of biodegradable bone implant materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021;32(4):43.
[14] HANKE L, JESSEN LK, WEISHEIT F, et al. Structural characterisation and degradation of Mg-Li thin films for biodegradable implants. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):12572.
[15] SARANYA K, KALAIYARASAN M, AGILAN P, et al. Biofunctionalization of Mg implants with gadolinium coating for bone regeneration. Surf Interfaces. 2022;31:101948.
[16] YU Z, HUANG Y, LIU L, et al. New strategy to solve the ambient strength-ductility dilemma in precipitation-strengthened Mg-Gd alloys via Li addition. Scr Mater. 2022;220:114901.
[17] GUAN X, XIONG M, ZENG F, et al. Enhancement of osteogenesis and biodegradation control by brushite coating on Mg-Nd-Zn-Zr alloy for mandibular bone repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(23):21525-21533.
[18] KUTIKOV AB, SKELLY JD, AYERS DC, et al. Templated repair of long bone defects in rats with bioactive spiral-wrapped electrospun amphiphilic polymer/hydroxyapatite scaffolds. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015; 7(8):4890-4901.
[19] WANG G, JIANG W, MO S, et al. Nonleaching Antibacterial Concept Demonstrated by In Situ Construction of 2D Nanoflakes on Magnesium. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020;7(1):1902089.
[20] GUO J, TIAN S, WANG Z, et al. Hydrogen saline water accelerates fracture healing by suppressing autophagy in ovariectomized rats. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:962303.
[21] KRAUS T, FISCHERAUER SF, HÄNZI AC, et al. Magnesium alloys for temporary implants in osteosynthesis: in vivo studies of their degradation and interaction with bone. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(3): 1230-1238.
[22] HAN HS, JUN I, SEOK HK, et al. Biodegradable magnesium alloys promote angio-osteogenesis to enhance bone repair. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020;7(15):2000800.
[23] HUANG TB, LI YZ, YU K, et al. Effect of the Wnt signal-RANKL/OPG axis on the enhanced osteogenic integration of a lithium incorporated surface. Biomater Sci. 2019;7(3):1101-1116.
[24] LIU W, CHEN D, JIANG G, et al. A lithium-containing nanoporous coating on entangled titanium scaffold can enhance osseointegration through Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Nanomed. 2018;14(1):153-164.
[25] ZHU DY, LU B, YIN JH, et al. Gadolinium-doped bioglass scaffolds promote osteogenic differentiation of hBMSC via the Akt/GSK3β pathway and facilitate bone repair in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:1085-1100.
[26] SONG X, LIU X, MA Y, et al. Synthesis of Ce/Gd@HA/PLGA Scaffolds Contributing to Bone Repair and MRI Enhancement. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:834226.
[27] LEIDI M, DELLERA F, MARIOTTI M, et al. High magnesium inhibits human osteoblast differentiation in vitro. Magnes Res. 2011;24(1):1-6.
[28] ZHANG L, YANG C, LI J, et al. High extracellular magnesium inhibits mineralized matrix deposition and modulates intracellular calcium signaling in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450(4):1390-1395.
[29] FLORENCIO-SILVA R, SASSO GR, SASSO-CERRI E, et al. Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:421746.
[30] TSAO YT, SHIH YY, LIU YA, et al. Knockdown of SLC41A1 magnesium transporter promotes mineralization and attenuates magnesium inhibition during osteogenesis of mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):39.
[31] NAKATANI S, MANO H, RYANGHYOK IM, et al. Excess magnesium inhibits excess calcium-induced matrix-mineralization and production of matrix gla protein (MGP) by ATDC5 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;348(3):1157-1162.
[32] HARTJEN P, WEGNER N, AHMADI P, et al. Toward Tailoring the Degradation Rate of Magnesium-Based Biomaterials for Various Medical Applications: Assessing Corrosion, Cytocompatibility and Immunological Effects. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(2):971.
[33] VIRTANEN S. Biodegradable Mg and Mg alloys: Corrosion and biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng B. 2011;176(20):1600-1608.
[34] GYÖRGYEY Á, UNGVÁRI K, KECSKEMÉTI G, et al. Attachment and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on laser-ablated titanium implant material. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013; 33(7):4251-4259.
[35] ANAND N, MEHROTRA N, PAL K. Biodegradable implant application: Electrodeposition of HA/TiO2/ZrO2 coating onto Zn-composite substrates. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;146:106073.