Influence of Gluma desensitizing agents on dentin bond strength: a Meta-analysis

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.47.018

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Desensitization agent is widely used to relieve tooth sensitivity after tooth preparation. However, some components in the desensitization agent for certain affect the dentin bond strength between prosthesis and dentin. Given this, choosing a proper desensitization agent is under discussion.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of Gluma desensitizing agents on bond strength to dentin by Meta-analysis.
METHODS: A computer-based retrieval of PubMed, EMbase, EBSCO EDLINE, The chrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web Of Science, OVID, CBMbase, CJFD, CqVip and WanFang databases combined with manual searching was performed for randomized controlled trials or controlled clinical trials about effect of desensitizing agents on dentin bond strength. The retrieval time ranged from the creation date to June 18, 2016, without region and language limits. In accordance with inclusion/exclusion criteria, related data were extracted, and the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the included studies was performed by two researchers independently, and then the Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the shear bond strength of self-etching or total-etching adhesive to dentin between two groups, and the same results were found when comparing the shear bond strength of self-etching and total-etching adhesive to dentin. The Gluma had a beneficial effect on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive. These results indicate that when Gluma used as the desensitizing agent, self-adhesive materials are the first choice, and secondly the self-etching or total-etching adhesive materials containing acid or able to dissolve protein crystals are preferred.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：生物材料；骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性；组织工程

Key words: Dentin-Bonding Agents, Dentin Sensitivity, Acid Etching, Dental, Shear Strength, Meta-Analysis, Tissue Engineering

CLC Number:

R318

Li Wang-yang, Zhang Ling, Zhang Hui, Li Ai-ling, Guo Ling. Influence of Gluma desensitizing agents on dentin bond strength: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2016, 20(47): 7119-7126.

Figures/Tables 8

References

[1]Bhatia S, Krishnaswamy MM. Effect of two different dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of two different bonding agents to dentin: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(6):703-708.
[2]Shafiei F, Memarpour M, Doozandeh M. Effect of oxalate desensitizer on the bonding durability of adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Prosthodont Res. 2012;56(3):187-193.
[3]Silva SM, Malacarne-Zanon J, Carvalho RM, et al. Effects of potassium oxalate on knoop hardness of etch-and-rinse adhesives. Oper Dent. 2012;37(4):356-362.
[4]Di Hipólito V, Rodrigues FP, Piveta FB, et al. Effectiveness of self-adhesive luting cements in bonding to chlorhexidine-treated dentin. Dent Mater. 2012;28(5):495-501.
[5]Can-Karabulut DC, Karabulut B. The effect of dentin hypersensitivity treatments on the shear bond strength to dentin of a composite material. Gen Dent. 2011; 59(1): e12-17.
[6]孙凯峥.抗菌剂在基托树脂中应用的研究进展[J].西南军医,2012,14(6):879-882.
[7]程梁.三种脱敏剂对牙本质粘接强度影响的实验研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2013.
[8]周倜.牙本质脱敏剂对粘结材料粘结强度的影响[D].长春:吉林大学,2012.
[9]Sailer I, Oendra AE, Stawarczyk B,et al. The effects of desensitizing resin, resin sealing, and provisional cement on the bond strength of dentin luted with self-adhesive and conventional resincements. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107(4):252-260.
[10]Külünk S, Saraç D, Külünk T, et al. The effects of different desensitizing agents on the shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23(6):380-387.
[11]Huh JB, Kim JH, Chung MK, et al. The effect of several dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of adhesive resin luting cement using self-etching primer. J Dent. 2008;36(12):1025-1032.
[12]Han XY, Zhu HS, Liu QY. Effect of different treatments of dentin surface on sheer bond strength between different bonding agents and dentin. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008;26(2):125-128.
[13]王雪,李金华,牟建钢,等.脱敏剂封闭牙本质小管的微结构特征及其对树脂粘接剂粘接强度的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2008,26(3):233-236.
[14][14] 毕文婷,高平,陈利民,等.不同脱敏方法对牙本质表面微结构形态及树脂粘接剂粘接力的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2011,27(1):88-91.
[15]邓琳琳,王璐,邱雨,等.脱敏及脱敏后酸蚀对牙本质与氧化锆粘结强度的影响[J].重庆医科大学学报, 2014(12): 1763-1766.
[16]曹瑞.Gluma脱敏剂对牙本质粘接界面纳米渗漏和剪切强度的影响[D].石家庄:河北医科大学,2015.
[17]Cobb DS, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Effect of HEMA-containing dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement. Am J Dent. 1997;10(2):62-65.
[18]Sailer I, Tettamanti S, Stawarczyk B, et al. In vitro study of the influence of dentin desensitizing and sealing on the shear bond strength of two universal resin cements. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12(5):381-392.
[19]李娜.三种衬垫材料对自酸蚀粘接剂剪切强度和窝洞边缘封闭性的影响[D].石家庄:河北医科大学,2014.
[20]陆梅,高宁,岑远坤,等.Gluma脱敏剂对不同粘接剂粘接拉伸和剪切强度的影响[J].山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(6):629-631.
[21]Sabatini C, Wu Z. Effect of Desensitizing Agents on the Bond Strength of Mild and Strong Self-etching Adhesives. Oper Dent. 2015;40(5):548-557.
[22]Stawarczyk B, Hartmann R, Hartmann L, et al. The effect of dentin desensitizer on shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin luting cements after aging. Oper Dent. 2011;36(5):492-501.
[23]Ding M, Shin SW, Kim MS, et al. The effect of a desensitizer and CO2 laser irradiation on bond performance between eroded dentin and resin composite. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(3):165-170.
[24]Kobler A, Schaller HG, Gernhardt CR. Effects of the desensitizing agents Gluma and Hyposen on the tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2008;21(6):388-392.
[25]Akca T, Yazici AR, Celik C, et al. The effect of desensitizing treatments on the bond strength of resin composite to dentin mediated by a self-etching primer. Oper Dent. 2007;32(5):451-456.
[26]Maeda FA, Fukushima KA, Tedesco TK, et al. Effect of erosive challenge and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin. Int J Adh Adhes. 2016;64:60-64.
[27]Makkar S, Goyal M, Kaushal A, et al. Effect of desensitizing treatments on bond strength of resin composites to dentin - an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(5):458-461.
[28]Hong S, Park N, Park Y, et al. The effects of desensitizing agents, bonding resin and tooth brushing on dentin permeability, in vitro. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2014;52(3):165-176.
[29]Jia R, Lu Y, Yang CW, et al. Effect of generation 4.0 polyamidoamine dendrimer on the mineralization of demineralized dentinal tubules in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59(10):1085-1093.
[30]Pei D, Liu S, Huang C, et al. Effect of pretreatment with calcium-containing desensitizer on the dentin bonding of mild self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013;121(3 Pt 1):204-210.
[31]Cortiano FM, Rached RN, Mazur RF, et al. Effect of desensitizing agents on the microtensile bond strength of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(3):309-315.
[32]Sengun A, Koyuturk AE, Sener Y, et al. Effect of desensitizers on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system to caries-affected dentin on the gingival wall. Oper Dent. 2005;30(4):430-435.
[33]Shafiei F, Alavi AA, Karimi F, et al. Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(4):268-274.
[34]Chermont AB, Carneiro KK, Lobato MF, et al. Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity using self-etching adhesives containing glutaraldehyde. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(3):349-354.