Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2013, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 1037-1043.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.06.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Toxicity of fluadarabine versus antithymocyteglobulin in conditioning regimen of non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Zhuang Xiao-yin, Li Qing-shan, Wang Shun-qing, Zhou Ming   

  1. Department of Haematology, the First People’s Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2012-07-06 Revised:2012-08-03 Online:2013-02-05 Published:2013-02-05
  • Contact: Li Qing-shan, Master, Chief physician, Department of Haematology, the First People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China drliqingshang@126.com
  • About author:Zhuang Xiao-yin★, Master, Physician, Department of Haematology, the First People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China zhuangxiaoyin2008@yahoo.com.cn

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The highly-effective conditioning regimens of proper dose and low-toxicity are the key to the successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Fludarabine and antithymocyteglobulin are intensive immunosuppressants, and are usually used in conditioning regimen of non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the toxicity of fluadarabine versus antithymocyteglobulin in the conditioning regimen of non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with malignant hematologic diseases were divided into fludarabine group and antithymocyteglobulin group according to the difference of immunosuppressants in conditioning regimen.Conditioning regimen consisted of fluadarabine or antithymocyteglobulin combined with the reduced-dose busulfan and cyclophosphamide or L-Sarcolysinum. The donor lymphocyte infusion was performed after the formation of mixed chimerism in antithymocyteglobulin group. The toxicity in the two groups was statistically analyzed, and the regimen-related toxicity was scored using the criteria of Bearman.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: No one died of regimen-related toxicity in two groups. There were no significant differences in the incidence of transaminase and diarrhea between fluadarabine and antithymocyteglobulin groups (P > 0.05); while the incidence of liver toxicity and mucositis in fluadarabine group was lower than that in the antithymocyteglobulin group (P < 0.05). About hemotologic toxicity, the time for white blood cell count reaching the lowest value and platelets ≥50×109/L, the volume of infused red cells and the volume of infused platelets in the fluadarabine group were lower than those in the antithymocyteglobulin group (P < 0.05).

Key words: stem cell, stem cell transplantation, fludarabine, antithymocyte globulin, nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cells transplantation, stem cells, cells transplantation, hematologic toxicity, conditioning, immunosuppressants, transfusion of blood components, organ toxicity, provincial grants-supported paper

CLC Number: