Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2019, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (22): 3488-3494.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1275

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Orthodontic micro-implant stability under continuous or intermittent loading: a histomorphometric and biomechanical evaluation

Wu Yeke1, Gao Ranran1, Zhao Lixing2
  

  1. 1Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China; 2West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-03-15
  • Contact: Wu Yeke, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
  • About author:Wu Yeke, MD, Attending physician, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
  • Supported by:

    the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81500818 and 81873334 (both to WYK)

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: During the orthodontic treatment process, many scholars believe that intermittent force can achieve the same or even greater effect of tooth movement than persistent force, and reduce the occurrence of root resorption and other adverse reactions. However, the above conclusions are mostly from in vitro cell experiments or clinical case study, and there is still a lack of scientifically designed and large-scale animal experiments.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of continuous or intermittent force of two modes on osseointegration and biostability of orthodontic micro-implant.
METHODS: Forty-eight beagles (provided by Laboratory Animal Center of Sichuan University) were selected and mini-implants were implanted bilaterally in intraradicular zones of mandibular first molar and second premolar. The beagles were randomly allotted into four groups: loadings were delivered consecutively in continuous group, and pauses were given for the last 3 or 7 days of each reactivation period for intermittent group A and B, respectively. The group unloaded served as control. Loading protocol and period: loading force was applied by installing nickel-titanium closed coil springs on two mini-implants with ligating wires, and 2-week was set as a loading period, for 4 periods. After 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, the mandible tissues were obtained for micro-CT, histological observation and pull-out test. The study was approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Sichuan University.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The values of peak load at extraction (Fmax) at various loading time points in the control group were higher than those in the continuous group (P < 0.05). Fmax of the intermittent group B was higher than that in the continuous group at week 2, 4 and 6 (P < 0.05); and the Fmax at week 2 in the intermittent group A was higher than the continuous group (P < 0.05). (2) At the same loading time point, the ossointegration, bone volume/tissue volume and intersection surface in the unloaded control were higher than those in the continuous group (P < 0.05). The ossointegration and bone volume/tissue volume in the intermittent group B at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks were higher than those in the continuous group (P < 0.05). At 2, 4 and 6 weeks, the intersection surface was higher than in the continuous group  (P < 0.05). The ossointegration in the intermittent group A at 2 and 4 weeks was higher than that in the continuous group (P < 0.05).The bone volume/tissue volume was higher than in the continuous group at 2, 4 and 6 weeks (P < 0.05). The intersection surface was higher than in the continuous group at 2 weeks (P < 0.05). (3) Bone remodeling was observed in all groups after 8 weeks of loading, and the bone remodeling was best in the unloaded control group, followed by intermittent groups B and A and poorest in the continuous group. (4) In summary, intermittent loading regimen is more favorable for obtaining stability than continuous force, and the 7-day/7-day loading cycle is more beneficial for bone-implant integration than the 11-day/3-day protocol.

Key words: mini-implants, continuous force, intermittent force, osseointegration, stability, peak pull-out, animal experiment, micro-CT

CLC Number: