Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2021, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 593-599.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2374

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of tantalum and titanium (alloy) as orthopedic materials: physical and chemical indexes, antibacterial and osteogenic ability

Shi Xiaoxiu, Mao Shilong, Liu Yang, Ma Xingshuang, Luo Yanfeng   

  1. Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2020-02-11 Revised:2020-02-20 Accepted:2020-04-03 Online:2021-02-08 Published:2020-11-23
  • Contact: Luo Yanfeng, Professor, Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • About author:Shi Xiaoxiu, Master candidate, Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Supported by:
    the National Key Research and Development Plan of China during the 13th Five-Year Plan Period, No. 2016YFB1101401

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Tantalum and titanium (alloy) are the most widely employed metallic biomaterials in orthopedics. Tantalum is especially focused because of its excellent corrosion resistance and osteointegration. However, whether tantalum is better than titanium (alloy) as orthopedic materials is still in dispute.
OBJECTIVE: To review the comparative studies on the biological performances of tantalum and titanium (alloy) and analyze the possible causes of the similarities and differences of biocompatibility of tantalum and titanium (alloy) materials in vivo and in vitro.
METHODS: A computer-based search of CNKI, Wanfang and PubMed database was performed for articles relating to the comparative studies on the biological performances of tantalum and titanium (alloy) published until January 2020. The search words were “tantalum” in title and “titanium” in title or abstract, i.e., (tantalum[Title])) AND (titanium[Title/Abstract]). 
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Among the comparative studies on the biological performances of tantalum and titanium (alloy), two viewpoints were primarily involved according to the results from clinical follow-up, animal tests, and cellular experiments. One is that tantalum is superior to titanium (alloy) with better osteogenesis and bone formation and stronger antibacterial activity, while the other one is that tantalum has similar osteogenesis and bone formation and antibacterial activity to titanium (alloy). The primary reason responsible for this divergence is that the fabrication method and the surface chemistries, topographical structures or pore structures are different between the employed tantalum and titanium (alloy).

Key words: bone, material, titanium, titanium alloy, tantalum, tantalum coating, orthopedics, osteogenesis, osseointegration, antibacterial

CLC Number: