中国组织工程研究

中国组织工程研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (35): 6287-6292.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.35.011

• 骨与关节生物力学 bone and joint biomechanics • 上一篇    下一篇

功能性踝关节不稳者的静态平衡能力

张  阳，张秋霞   

  1. 苏州大学体育学院，江苏省苏州市  215021
  • 收稿日期:2012-12-20 修回日期:2013-02-19 出版日期:2013-08-27 发布日期:2013-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 张秋霞，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，苏州大学体育学院，江苏省苏州市 215021 zqxxqa@qq.com
  • 作者简介:张阳★，男，1987年生，山东省临沂市人，苏州大学体育学院在读硕士，主要从事运动生物力学研究。 sdjnzy1987_@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    苏州大学青年教师后期资助课题

Static balance ability of functional ankle instability patients

Zhang Yang, Zhang Qiu-xia   

  1. Institute of Physical Education, Soochow University, Suzhou  215021, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2012-12-20 Revised:2013-02-19 Online:2013-08-27 Published:2013-08-27
  • Contact: Zhang Qiu-xia, Doctor, Associate professor, Master’s supervisor, Institute of Physical Education, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu Province, China zqxxqa@qq.com
  • About author:Zhang Yang★, Studying for master’s degree, Institute of Physical Education, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu Province, China sdjnzy1987_@126.com
  • Supported by:

    Post-funded Project for Young Teachers of Soochow University

PDF

670

被引次数

23

摘要：

背景：目前国内对功能性踝关节不稳者平衡能力的研究较少，并且其平衡能力的缺失也可能是导致踝关节反复损伤的一个重要原因，对其研究能有效地降低损伤概率。
目的：分析功能性踝关节不稳者的静态平衡能力特征。
方法：选取10名男性患有单侧功能性踝关节不稳的受试者为实验组，匹配10名无踝关节伤病的受试者作为对照组。采用win-pod平衡功能检测系统对受试者进行双足和单足的静态平衡能力的测试，双足测试30 s，单足测试10 s，获得评价平衡能力各指标的数值。
结果与结论：双足测试时，无论是睁眼还是闭眼状态下，实验组的各项指标与对照组之间差异无显著性意义(P > 0.05)，但双足站立时各指标的值明显都小于单足站立时各指标值，说明在双足站立时，功能性踝关节不稳者的静态平衡能力与正常人差异没有显著性意义，而双足的静态平衡能力比单足的要好。而在患侧足单足测试时，观察发现功能性踝关节不稳者的静态平衡能力略差于正常人，尤其在闭眼状态下。再通过组内X轴平均摆幅与Y 轴平均摆幅的对比发现，在维持平衡姿势的过程中，身体重心的摆动方向基本上以前后方向为主。

关键词: 骨关节植入物, 骨与关节生物力学, 功能性踝关节不稳, 静态, 平衡能力, 双足, 单足, 其他基金

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: At present, the study to balance ability of functional ankle instability patients is less. The balance ability deficiency may also be one of the important reasons for ankle repeated injury, so the research can effectively reduce the damage probability.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the static balance ability characteristics of functional ankle instability patients.
METHODS: Ten male subjects with unilateral functional ankle instability were enrolled as the experimental group in the study, and other 10 healthy match-paired subjects were served as the control group. Their static balance ability was measured under double feet standing and single foot standing using win-pod system, the double feet testing lasted for 30 seconds and the single foot testing lasted for 10 seconds. Evaluation parameters of balance ability were obtained.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: During double feet testing, there were no significant differences in balance ability parameters between the experimental group and the control group whether eyes be opened or closed (P > 0.05), but the index values of double feet testing were obviously less than those of single foot testing. So we concluded that in the double feet standing, there was no significant difference in the static balance ability between functional ankle instability patients and normal persons. Moreover, the static balance ability of double feet was better than that of single feet. In the single foot standing of the affected foot, the static balance ability of functional ankle instability patients was slightly worse than that of the normal persons, especially with eyes closed. Comparison of the average swing between the X-axis and Y-axis found that in the process of maintaining balance posture, the swing direction of the body center of gravity was mainly in the anteroposterior direction.

Key words: bone and joint implants, biomechanics of bone and joint, functional ankle instability, static, balance ability, double foot, single foot, other grants-supported paper

中图分类号: