Classification and distribution of fracture areas in fresh
osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures based on CT multi-planar
reconstruction and MRI

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2476

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Some scholars have classified osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures based on X-ray and MRI findings. However, little is reported on the morphological types and distribution rules of fracture areas in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and summarize the morphological types and distribution of fracture areas in fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures based on CT multi-planar reconstruction and MRI.

METHODS: Clinical data from 352 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, 73.07 years of age, including 69 males and 283 females admitted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine from September 2011 to June 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. After admission, CT multi-planar reconstruction, MRI and bone mineral density measurements were conducted in each patient. Fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were confirmed in 477 vertebrae according to clinical manifestations and imaging findings. Fracture areas were defined as shade compact or bright line based on CT multi-planar reconstruction or bone marrow edema on the MRI. Morphological type and distribution of fracture areas were recorded by two experienced spinal surgeons and one senior radiologist independently. The study protocol was approved by the Ethic Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine in China with an approval No. ZYYECKYJ[2017]057.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Fracture areas of 472 vertebrae were indicated distinctly on the MRI, whereas the fracture areas of 5 vertebrae were unclear. Meanwhile, fracture areas of 469 vertebrae were shown clearly on the CT multi-planar reconstruction, but the areas of 8 vertebrae were obscure on the CT. Fracture areas of 5 vertebrae were unclear in both CT and MRI. There was no significant difference between CT and MRI in the observation of fracture areas (P=0.402). Finally, fracture areas of 8 vertebrae could not be described accurately on CT, MRI or both. In the sagittal plane of CT and MRI, morphological types of fracture areas of 469 vertebrae were divided into impacted fracture area (n=311, 66.31%) and cleft fracture area (n=158, 33.69%). Of the 158 cleft fracture areas, 26 vertebrae contained gas, 28 vertebrae contained liquid, and 7 vertebrae included both gas and liquid. Of the 469 vertebrae, the location of fracture areas was divided into 5 types: superior (n=238, 50.75%), inferior (n=80, 17.06%), anterior (n=21, 4.48%), central (n=110, 23.45%) and mixed (n=20, 4.26%). These findings indicate that the morphological types and distribution of fracture areas in fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures can be effectively distinguished by CT multi-planar reconstruction and MRI, which is important for early diagnosis and further treatment of fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Key words: osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, CT multi-planar reconstruction, MRI, fracture area, classification, morphological type, distribution, impacted fracture, cleft sign

CLC Number:

Mo Ling, Liang De, Huang Jinjing, Jiang Xiaobing, Yang Zhidong, Ye Linqiang, Cui Jianchao, Zhang Shuncong, Yao Zhensong, Jin Daxiang. Classification and distribution of fracture areas in fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures based on CT multi-planar reconstruction and MRI[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2020, 24(11): 1647-1653.

Figures/Tables 9

References

[1] FRANCISRM,ASPRAY TJ,HIDE G,et al.Back pain in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(7): 895-903.
[2] KIM DH, VACCARO AR.Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine:current options and considerations for treatment. Spine J.2006;6(5):479-487.
[3] EDIDIN AA, ONG KL, LAU E, et al.Morbidity and mortality after vertebral fractures: comparison of vertebral augmentation and nonoperative management in the medicare population.Spine(Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(15):1228-1241.
[4] HA YC, BAEK JH, KO YB, et al. High mortality and poor morbidity after hip fracture in patients with previous vertebral fractures.J Bone Miner Metab.2015;33(5):547-552.
[5] ISMAIL AA, COOPER C, FELSENBERG D, et al.Number and type of vertebral deformities: epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9(3): 206-213.
[6] KANCHIKU T, TAGUCHI T, KAWAI S. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis and new classification of the osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Orthop Sci.2003;8(4):463-466.
[7] SUGITA M, WATANABE N, MIKAMI Y, et al.Classification of vertebral compression fractures in the osteoporotic spine.J Spinal Disord Tech.2005;18(4):376-381.
[8] WU CT, LEE SC, LEE ST, et al.Classification of symptomatic osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine.J Clin Neurosci.2006;13(1):31-38.
[9] BARR JD, BARR MS, LEMLEY TJ, et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2000;25(8):923-928.
[10] LIANG D, YE LQ, JIANG XB, et al.Biomechanical effects of cement distribution in the fractured area on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.J Surg Res.2015;195(1):246-256.
[11] 江晓兵,莫凌,梁德,等.骨水泥在椎体骨折线内弥散情况对椎体成形术治疗效果的影响[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,24(2): 144-149.
[12] GILL JB, KUPER M, CHIN PC, et al.Comparing pain reduction following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Pain Physician. 2007;10(4):583-590.
[13] CHEN B, LI Y, XIE D, et al.Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty on the stiffness and biomechanical balance of compression fractured vertebrae.Eur Spine J. 2011;20(8):1272-1280.
[14] CHEN L, YANG H, TANG T.Unilateral versus bilateral balloon kyphoplasty for multilevel osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(7):534-540.
[15] LIU JT, LIAO WJ, TAN WC, et al.Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study.Osteoporos Int.2010;21(2):359-364.
[16] ITSHAYEK E, MILLER P, BARZILAY Y, et al.Vertebral augmentation in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: review and new insights from recent studies.J Clin Neurosci.2012;19(6):786-791.
[17] GARFIN SR, YUAN HA, REILEY MA.New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2001;26(14):1511-1515.
[18] OGUT T, AYHAN E, KANTARCI F, et al.Medial fracture line significance in calcaneus fracture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011; 50(5):517-521.
[19] OZDEN H, DEMIR A, GUVEN G, et al.The relation of sulcus nervi radialis with the fracture line of humerus fracture and radial nerve injury.Surg Radiol Anat.2009;31(4):283-287.
[20] MEMARSADEGHI M, BREITENSEHER MJ, SCHAEFER-PROKOP C, et al. Occult scaphoid fractures: comparison of multidetector CT and MR imaging-initial experience.Radiology.2006;240(1):169-176.
[21] PHAM T, AZULAY-PARRADO J, CHAMPSAUR P, et al. "Occult" osteoporotic vertebral fractures: vertebral body fractures without radiologic collapse.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(21):2430-2435.
[22] PARK SY, LEE SH, SUH SW, et al. Usefulness of MRI in determining the appropriate level of cement augmentation for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.J Spinal Disord Tech.2013;26(3):E80-85.
[23] LINN J, BIRKENMAIER C, HOFFMANN RT, et al.The intravertebral cleft in acute osteoporotic fractures: fluid in magnetic resonance imaging-vacuum in computed tomography?Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2009;34(2):E88-93.
[24] HUTCHINS TA, WIGGINS RH, STEIN JM, et al.Acute traumatic intraosseous fluid sign predisposes to dynamic fracture mobility.Emerg Radiol.2017;24(2):149-155.
[25] PIAZZOLLA A, SOLARINO G, LAMARTINA C, et al.Vertebral Bone Marrow Edema (VBME) in Conservatively Treated Acute Vertebral Compression Fractures (VCFs): Evolution and Clinical Correlations.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(14): E842-848.
[26] EUSTACE S, KEOGH C, BLAKE M, et al.MR imaging of bone oedema: mechanisms and interpretation.Clin Radiol. 2001; 56(1):4-12.
[27] YU WE, LIANG D, JIANG X, et al.Efficacy and safety of the target puncture technique for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral clefts.J Neurointerv Surg.2017;9(11):1113-1117.