Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2015, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (47): 7639-7643.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.47.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of the hardness and bond strength of different composite resin materials

Wang Nan-yan, Zhang Hui-yan   

  1. Department of Stomatology, the First people’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2015-10-08 Online:2015-11-19 Published:2015-11-19
  • About author:Wang Nan-yan, Associate chief physician, Department of Stomatology, the First people’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, Guangdong Province, China

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Compared with the conventional composite resin materials, large pieces of filling composite resin materials have the features of increasing light-curing depth, decreasing the polymerization shrinkage rate and streamlining operational procedures; however, the properties of different types of large pieces of filling composite resin materials are different.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the hardness and bond strength of four kinds of composite resin materials.
METHODS: Large pieces of filling composite resin Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, SDR, as well as conventional composite resin P60, Z350 were obtained. The vickers microhardness of these four kinds of composite resin materials under the light-curing depth of 2, 3, 4, 5 mm was detected. The shear bond strength between these four kinds of composite resin materials and the dentin was also detected.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The hardness order under different light-curing depths was: P60 composite resin > Z350 composite resin > Tetric EvoCeram BulkFill composite resin > SDR composite resin, there was a significant difference between these four groups (P < 0.05). The light-cured hardness of Tetric EvoCream BulkFil and SDR composite resins was not significantly decreased with the increased cured depth. The shear bond strength of Tetric EvoCeram BulkFill and SDR composite resins was significantly higher compared with the P60 and Z350 composite resins (P < 0.05). These results demonstrate that large pieces of filling resinous materials, Tetric EvoCeram BulkFill and SDR, show better comprehensive mechanical properties and have a higher shear bond strength. 
中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:生物材料;骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性;组织工程

Key words: Composite Resins, Hardness, Dental Bonding, Tissue Engineering