Biomechanical analysis of micro-implant anchorage in the infrazygomatic crest for the distal displacement of the upper dentition at different heights

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.0710

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: In orthodontics, micro-implant anchorage in the infrazygomatic crest that cannot damage the tooth root can achieve an unobstructed overall movement of the upper dentition. However, little is reported on the stress and strain of the tooth and alveolar bone during the distal movement of the upper dentition.

OBJECTIVE: To set up a three-dimensional finite element model to perform a biomechanical analysis of micro-implant anchorage in the infrazygomatic crest for the distal displacement of the upper dentition at different heights.

METHODS: Cone-beam CT data from a female patient admitted for orthodontic treatment was saved in Dicom format, and imported into Mimics 16.01 software. Then, a three-dimensional model of the right maxilla and tooth dentition was made by automatically and manually selecting boundaries. The model was imported into Geomagic8.0 for removal of noise dots and smooth processing, and then it was imported into the Mimics16.01 software and meshed for the surface/body through 3 Matics software. Afterwards, three-dimensional models maxillary denture, archwires and traction hooks and implants were established by ProE5.0, and all the models were imported into ANSYS13.0 and assembled and analyzed for stress and strain analysis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We successfully established the three-dimensional finite element model for biomechanical analysis of micro-implant anchorage in the infrazygomatic crest for the distal displacement of the upper dentition at different heights, and this model conformed to the anatomic features. With the increase of the height of traction hooks (1, 4, 7, 10 mm), the vertical stress of the maxillary teeth increased gradually, and had no correlation with the change of the horizontal stress. With the increase of the height of traction hooks, at the sagittal axis, the strain at midpoints of middle incisors, canine teeth, and first molars decreased gradually and the strain at the root of middle incisors and canine teeth also decreased gradually, but there was no change in the strain at the root of first molars. With the increase of the height of traction hooks, at the vertical axis, the strain at the midpoints and tooth root of middle incisors increased, while the strain of canine crown increased gradually and that of the canine root decreased; the strain at the midpoint of first molars changed a little, and the strain of the tooth root decreased gradually. The dentition rotated from clockwise to counterclockwise. To conclude, the three-dimensional finite element model made in the study is consistent with the anatomic structure, which provides a basis for biomechanical analysis of micro-implant anchorage in the infrazygomatic crest for the distal displacement of the upper dentition. The upper dentition impedance center located in the position of 4 to 7 mm of the arch wire can be used as the microimplant support site in the infrazygomatic crest.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：生物材料；骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性；组织工程

Key words: Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures, Finite Element Analysis, Biomechanics, Tissue Engineering

CLC Number:

R318

Yang Jian-hao, Han Lu, Li Ya-ru, Zhang Yue-lan. Biomechanical analysis of micro-implant anchorage in the infrazygomatic crest for the distal displacement of the upper dentition at different heights[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2018, 22(10): 1523-1528.

Figures/Tables 8

References

[1]兰泽栋,林珠,龙红月,等.支抗种植体长度对骨界面应力分布的影响[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2003,8(3):112-115.

[2]Jensen OT,Adams MW,Smith E.Paranasal bone: the prime factor affecting the decision to use transsinus vs zygomatic implants for biomechanical support for immediate function in maxillary dental implant reconstruction.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2014;29(1):e130-138.

[3]张扬,张丹,冯翠娟.微小种植体正畸支抗生物力学的三维有限元分析[J].上海口腔医学,2005,14(3):281-283.

[4]Lee HS, Choi HM, Choi DS,et al.Bone thickness of the infrazygomatic crest area in skeletal Class III growing patients:A computed tomographic study.Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43(4):261-266.

[5]王震东,王林,倪晓宇,等.不同长度微种植体支抗应力差异的三维有限元研究[J].口腔医学,2005,25(2):96-97.

[6]刘慧娟.微种植体支抗后退整个上牙列时平面改变的三维有限元研究[D].中国医科大学,2012.

[7]Lee HS,Choi HM,Choi DS,et al.Bone thickness of the infrazygomatic crest area in skeletal Class III growing patients: A computed tomographic study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2012;141(3):345-351.

[8]陈立艳,刘志杰,苑芳连,等.颧压槽嵴区骨宽度及皮质骨厚度的CBCT测量分析[J].口腔医学研究,2017,33(6):637-641.

[9]Lee NK,Baek SH.Stress and displacement between maxillary protraction with miniplates placed at the infrazygomatic crest and the lateral nasal wall: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(3): 345-351.

[10]张翼,张磊,樊瑜波,等.微植体支抗滑动法内收上颌前牙的三维有限元研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2009,27(5):557-560.

[11]Hung KF,Ai QY,Fan SC,et al.Measurement of the zygomatic region for the optimal placement of quad zygomatic implants.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2017;19(5):841-848.

[12]李琦.上颌骨微植体支抗正畸矫治系统数值分析研究[D].重庆医科大学,2007.

[13]艾林,丁伟,倪龙兴.有限元法与口腔生物力学[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2005,21(5):318-319.

[14]Butterworth CJ,Rogers SN.The zygomatic implant perforated (ZIP) flap: a new technique for combined surgical reconstruction and rapid fixed dental rehabilitation following low-level maxillectomy.Int J Implant Dent.2017;3(1):37.

[15]毕振宇,刘阳,黄文华.有限元分析法在口腔生物力学领域的应用[J].解剖科学进展,2009,15(4):427-431.

[16]Coppedê A,de Mayo T,de Sá Zamperlini M,et al.Three-year clinical prospective follow-up of extrasinus zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2017;19(5):926-934.

[17]车蓓,张昊,钱才梅,等.不同垂直骨面型安氏II类1分类错颌患者颞下颌关节三维形态结构的比较[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2014, 49(7):399-402.

[18][胡丽,林久祥,陈莉莉.基于颈椎骨龄定量分期法的安氏II类I分类错颌畸形患者最佳矫形时机的探讨.[J].临床口腔医学杂志. 2013,29(3):131-134.

[19]陈文君,于海涛,古力巴哈买买提力.不同功能矫治安氏II类错颌下颌支抗丧失的对比研究[J].新疆医科大学学报, 2014,37(10): 1366-1368.

[20]胡铮,谢雨菲,陆佩珺,等.颧牙槽嵴区域骨密度厚度的锥形束CT测量分析[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2014,41(3):281-285.

[21]Billiet T,de-Pauw G,Dermaut L.Location of the centre of resistance of the upper dentition and the nasomaxillary complex:An Experimental study.Eur J Orthod. 2011;23(3): 263-273.

[22]Chung Gm,Sung SJ,Lee LJ,et al.Finite element investigation of the center of resistance of the maxillary dentition korean J Orthod.2009;39(1):83-94.

[23]Mozzati M,Mortellaro C,Arata V,et al.Rehabilitation with 4 zygomatic implants with a new surgical protocol using ultrasonic technique.J Craniofac Surg.2015,26(3):722-728.

[24]Jensen OT, Adams MW, Smith E.Paranasal bone: the prime factor affecting the decision to use transsinus vs zygomatic implants for biomechanical support for immediate function in maxillary dental implant reconstruction.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2014;29(1):e130-138.

[25]Lee HS,Choi HM,Choi DS,et al.Bone thickness of the infrazygomatic crest area in skeletal Class III growing patients: A computed tomographic study.Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43(4): 261-266.

[26]Lee NK,Baek SH.Stress and displacement between maxillary protraction with miniplates placed at the infrazygomatic crest and the lateral nasal wall: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(3): 345-351

[27]Ishida Y,Ono T.Nonsurgical treatment of an adult with a skeletal Class II gummy smile using zygomatic temporary anchorage devices and improved superelastic nickel-titanium alloy wires.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;152(5): 693-705.

[28]Benatto GB,Bueno CRS,Curvello VP,et al.Management of Zygomatic Fixture Complication Case Using Extra-Short Implants.J Craniofac Surg.2017;(8):e797-e799.