Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2021, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (28): 4480-4484.doi: 10.12307/2021.061

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of excess resin adhesive removal method on the marginal integrity of all-ceramic crowns with different marginal gaps

Zhang Haiyang1, Liu Jianzhang2, Kan Na3, Li Hongxia4, Wang Junfeng5, Jiang Haiwei1, Qiu Chengyu1, Xiao Zhen1   

  1. 1Department of Prosthodontics, No. 1 Hospital in Qiqihar, Qiqihar 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China; 2Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing 100081, China; 3Lianyungang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China; 4Second General Department of Ruitai Stomatology Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 5Department of Stomatology of Qinhuangdao Second Hospital, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei Province, China
  • Received:2020-07-31 Revised:2020-08-11 Accepted:2020-09-15 Online:2021-10-08 Published:2021-05-19
  • Contact: 刘建彰,副主任医师,北京大学口腔医院口腔修复科,北京市 100081
  • About author:Zhang Haiyang, Master, Associate chief physician, Department of Prosthodontics, No. 1 Hospital in Qiqihar, Qiqihar 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China
  • Supported by:
    the Qiqihar Science and Technology Bureau Project, No. SFZD-2016054 (to ZHY)

Abstract: BACKGROUND: There are many studies on the marginal integrity of all ceramic crowns with different resin adhesives, or different shoulder, different polymerization angles, but there is no research on whether different methods of redundant bonding will affect the marginal integrity of all ceramic crowns. 
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of removing excess resin adhesive on the marginal integrity of all ceramic crowns with different marginal gaps. 
METHODS: Totally 40 extracted third molars were prepared with all ceramic crowns and randomly divided into groups A, B, C, and D (10 teeth in each group). After the model scanning was completed, the edges of restoration in groups A, B and C were lifted at 30, 60 and 90 µm respectively by computer control, while those in group D were not raised. Procera alumina CAD-CAM all ceramic crowns were made. Then, the four groups of groups A, B, C and D were randomly divided into two subgroups. In one subgroup, a large amount of excess resin adhesive was removed with a small brush, and then the light was illuminated for 40 seconds after the full crown bonding. Subsequently, a small amount of resin adhesive was scraped off with sickle scalpel (small brush group). The sample in the other subgroup was exposed to light for 2 seconds, scraped off with sickle scalpel, and then illuminated for 40 seconds (sickle group). The marginal integrity and surface quality of the adhesive were observed by scanning electron microscope.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Scanning electron microscope showed that the continuity of the bonding interface was better in the small brush group. Different degrees of adhesive defects were found in the sickle group. Under the same marginal gap, the defect rate of cement in the small brush group was lower than that in the sickle group (P < 0.05). Under the same adhesive removal method, there was no significant difference in the defect rate of cement between groups A, B, C, and D (P > 0.05). (2) Results indicate that the method of using small brush to remove excess adhesive, then lighting for 40 seconds, and finally using sickle scalpel to remove the remaining small amount of adhesive is more suitable for clinical practice.

Key words: materials, oral cavity, marginal integrity, all ceramic crown, adhesive, resin adhesive, tissue engineering, adhesive surface quality

CLC Number: