中国组织工程研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (27): 7151-7159.doi: 10.12307/2026.861

• 骨科植入物Orthopedic implants • 上一篇    下一篇

筋膜间隙阻滞与股神经阻滞在髋部骨折手术中对疼痛、炎症和应激反应的影响

郭冬冬,谷永付,张开然   

  1. 南京江北医院,江苏省南京市  210048
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-20 接受日期:2026-01-24 出版日期:2026-09-28 发布日期:2026-05-22
  • 作者简介:郭冬冬,男,1988年生,江苏省宿迁市人,主治医师,主要从事麻醉学方面的研究。

Pain, inflammation, and stress response of fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery

Guo Dongdong, Gu Yongfu, Zhang Kairan   

  1. Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital, Nanjing 210048, Jiangsu Province, China

  • Received:2025-09-20 Accepted:2026-01-24 Online:2026-09-28 Published:2026-05-22
  • About author:Guo Dongdong, Attending physician, Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital, Nanjing 210048, Jiangsu Province, China

摘要:

文题释义:

髂筋膜间隙阻滞:是一种区域神经阻滞技术,通过在髂筋膜下方、髂腰肌表面的潜在间隙内注射局麻药物,使药物在筋膜间隙内扩散,同时阻滞股神经、股外侧皮神经和闭孔神经,从而达到髋部及大腿前外侧区域镇痛的效果。该技术具有单次穿刺点即可阻滞多条神经、镇痛范围广、并发症发生率低等优点。
股神经阻滞:是一种周围神经阻滞技术,通过在腹股沟韧带下方、股动脉外侧定位股神经,在神经周围注射局麻药物,阻断股神经的感觉传导,主要用于大腿前侧和膝关节内侧的镇痛。该技术操作相对简单、定位明确,是髋部和下肢手术常用的镇痛方法之一。

摘要
背景:髋部骨折是老年人群常见的严重创伤,术后疼痛管理直接影响患者康复质量和功能恢复。外周神经阻滞已成为多模式镇痛的重要组成部分,但不同阻滞技术在各型髋部骨折手术中的镇痛效果尚缺乏系统比较。
目的:比较髂筋膜间隙阻滞和股神经阻滞在不同类型髋部骨折手术中的镇痛效果、安全性及对术后恢复的影响。
方法:选择2022年1月至2024年6月收治的180例计划行髋部骨折手术的患者,按骨折类型分为股骨颈骨折组、转子间骨折组和转子下骨折组,每组60例。每组患者再采用随机数字表法等分为髂筋膜间隙阻滞组和股神经阻滞组,每组30例。术前给予相应的神经阻滞,记录术后即刻、6 h、12 h和24 h的数字疼痛评分、24 h内吗啡消耗量、首次下床活动时间、住院天数、术后24 h炎症指标(白细胞介素6、肿瘤坏死因子α)、应激反应指标(皮质醇、血糖)以及不良反应发生情况。采用多因素回归分析影响镇痛效果的因素,并构建列线图预测模型。
结果与结论:①股骨颈骨折组和转子间骨折组中,髂筋膜间隙阻滞亚组患者术后即刻及术后6,12 h数字疼痛评分均显著低于股神经阻滞亚组(P < 0.01);②在股骨颈骨折组,术后即刻及术后6,12 h数字疼痛评分髂筋膜间隙阻滞亚组和股神经阻滞亚组的平均差异分别为0.86分(95%CI:0.47-1.25)、0.90分(95%CI:0.45-1.35)和0.79分(95%CI:0.30-1.28);在转子间骨折组,平均差异分别为0.83分(95%CI:0.43-1.23)、0.87分(95%CI:0.44-1.30)和0.70分(95%CI:0.31-1.09);③在股骨颈骨折、转子间骨折中,髂筋膜间隙阻滞亚组较股神经阻滞亚组24 h内吗啡消耗量显著减少(均P < 0.001);首次下床活动时间提前(均P < 0.05),住院天数缩短(均P < 0.05);④转子下骨折组中,髂筋膜间隙阻滞亚组与股神经阻滞亚组所有观察指标相比均无显著性差异(P > 0.05);⑤髂筋膜间隙阻滞组的炎症指标白细胞介素6(P < 0.001)、肿瘤坏死因子α
(P < 0.001)和应激指标皮质醇(P < 0.001)、血糖(P < 0.001)水平均显著低于股神经阻滞组;两种阻滞方式的不良反应总发生率相当(P=0.825),主要包括恶心呕吐、便秘和尿潴留;⑥多因素回归分析显示,阻滞方式(β=-3.76,P < 0.001)、骨折类型(转子下骨折β=5.47,P < 0.001)、年 龄≥75岁(β=-1.75,P=0.022)和ASA分级Ⅲ级(β=2.32,P=0.016)是影响镇痛效果的独立预测因素;⑦列线图预测模型显示良好的校准性;白细胞介素6水平与住院天数(r=0.42,P < 0.001)和首次下床活动时间(r=0.38,P < 0.001)呈正相关。提示:与股神经阻滞相比,髂筋膜间隙阻滞可为股骨颈骨折和转子间骨折患者提供更优的术后镇痛效果,显著降低炎症和应激反应,缩短首次下床活动时间和住院天数,促进早期康复;但在转子下骨折患者中,两种阻滞技术的疗效相当;阻滞方式、骨折类型、年龄和ASA分级是影响镇痛效果的独立因素;构建的列线图预测模型可为临床个体化镇痛方案选择提供参考。


中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:人工关节;骨植入物;脊柱;骨折;内固定;数字化骨科;组织工程

关键词: 髂筋膜间隙阻滞, 股神经阻滞, 髋部骨折, 股骨颈骨折, 转子间骨折, 转子下骨折, 术后镇痛

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is a common and serious injury in the elderly population, with postoperative pain management directly impacting rehabilitation quality and functional recovery. While peripheral nerve blocks have become an integral component of multimodal analgesia, systematic comparison of different blocking techniques across various types of hip fractures remains limited.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic effects, safety profiles, and postoperative recovery impacts of fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block in different types of hip fracture surgeries. 
METHODS: A total of 180 patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery between January 2022 and June 2024 were enrolled and divided according to fracture type into femoral neck fracture group (n=60), intertrochanteric fracture group (n=60), and subtrochanteric fracture group (n=60). Patients in each group were randomly assigned to either fascia iliaca compartment block group or femoral nerve block group using a random number table, with 30 patients in each subgroup. Corresponding nerve blocks were performed preoperatively. Numerical Rating Scale scores at immediate postoperative, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, morphine consumption within 24 hours, time to first ambulation, length of hospital stay, inflammatory markers (interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α) and stress response indicators (cortisol, blood glucose) at 24 hours postoperatively, and incidence of adverse reactions were recorded. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing analgesic efficacy, and a nomogram prediction model was constructed.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) In femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture subgroups, fascia iliaca compartment block group showed significantly lower Numerical Rating Scale scores than femoral nerve block group at immediate postoperative, 6 and 12 hours (P < 0.01). (2) In femoral neck fracture group, the mean differences were 0.86 points (95%CI: 0.47-1.25), 0.90 points (95%CI: 0.45-1.35), and 0.79 points (95%CI: 0.30-1.28), respectively; in intertrochanteric fracture group, the mean differences were 0.83 points (95%CI: 0.43-1.23), 0.87 points (95%CI: 0.44-1.30), and 0.70 points (95%CI: 0.31-1.09), respectively. (3) In femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture groups, morphine consumption within 24 hours was significantly reduced (all P < 0.001), time to first ambulation was earlier (all P < 0.05), and length of hospital stay was shorter (all P < 0.05) in the fascia iliaca compartment block subgroup compared with the femoral nerve block subgroup. (4) In subtrochanteric fracture group, no significant differences were observed between fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block subgroups in all observed parameters (P > 0.05). (5) Fascia iliaca compartment block group showed significantly lower levels of inflammatory markers interleukin-6 (P < 0.001), tumor necrosis factor-α (P < 0.001) and stress indicators cortisol (P < 0.001), blood glucose 
(P < 0.001) compared with femoral nerve block group. The overall incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two blocking techniques (P=0.825), mainly including nausea/vomiting, constipation, and urinary retention. (6) Multivariate regression analysis revealed that block technique (β=-3.76, P < 0.001), fracture type (subtrochanteric fracture β=5.47, P < 0.001), age ≥75 years (β=-1.75, P=0.022), and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III (β=2.32, P=0.016) were independent predictors of analgesic efficacy. (7) The nomogram prediction model demonstrated good calibration. Interleukin-6 levels were positively correlated with length of hospital stay (r=0.42, P < 0.001) and time to first ambulation (r=0.38, P < 0.001). It is concluded that compared with femoral nerve block, fascia iliaca compartment block provides superior postoperative analgesia for patients with femoral neck fractures and intertrochanteric fractures, significantly reduces inflammatory and stress responses, shortens time to first ambulation and hospital stay, and promotes early recovery. However, in patients with subtrochanteric fractures, the two blocking techniques show comparable efficacy. Block technique, fracture type, age, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade are independent factors influencing analgesic efficacy. The constructed nomogram prediction model can provide reference for individualized analgesic strategy selection in clinical practice.

Key words: fascia iliaca compartment block, femoral nerve block, hip fracture, femoral neck fracture, intertrochanteric fracture, subtrochanteric fracture, postoperative analgesia

中图分类号: