[1] OH SH, KIM Y, PARK JY, et al. Comparison of fixed implant-supported prostheses, removable implant supported prostheses, and complete dentures: patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):e31-e37.
[2] YAO CJ, CAO C, BORNSTEIN MM, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures of edentulous patients restored with implant-supported removable and fixed prostheses: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 16:241-254.
[3] REISSMANN DR, DARD M, LAMPRECHT R, et al. Oral health-related quality of life in subjects with implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review. J Dent. 2017;65:22-40.
[4] ELSYAD MA, ELGAMAL M, MOHAMMED ASKAR O, et al. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdenture for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation. A crossover study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(11):1107-1117.
[5] DURKAN R, OYAR P, DESTE G. Maxillary and mandibular all-on-four implant designs: A review. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(8):1033-1040.
[6] LIMA LB, DE FREITAS NR, NOVAIS VR, et al. Impact of Implant Number on Mandibular Implant-Supported Profile Prostheses: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(4):795-807.
[7] DE LUNA GOMES JM, LEMOS CAA, SANTIAGO JUNIOR JF, et al. Optimal number of implants for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses with a follow-up of at least 5 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(5):766-774.
[8] NIEDERMAIER R, STELZLE F, RIEMANN M, et al. Implant-supported immediately loaded fixed full-arch dentures: evaluation of implant survival rates in a case cohort of up to 7 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(1):4-19.
[9] SOTO-PENALOZA D, ZARAGOZI-ALONSO R, PENARROCHA-DIAGO M, et al. The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(3): e474-e488.
[10] WINDAEL S, VERVAEKE S, WIJNEN L, et al. Ten-year follow-up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(4):515-521.
[11] ISHIGAKI S, NAKANO T, YAMADA S, et al. Biomechanical stress in bone surrounding an implant under simulated chewing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(1):97-102.
[12] EMAMI E, MICHAUD PL, SALLALEH I, et al. Implant-assisted Complete Prostheses. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):119-131.
[13] GOIATO MC, DE MEDEIROS RA, DA SILVA EV, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of spring system for implant-supported prosthesis: analysis by photoelasticity and extensometry. J Med Eng Technol. 2017;41(4):309-313.
[14] FRASER D, FUNKENBUSCH P, ERCOLI C, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the osseointegration of porous tantalum implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(6):811-820.
[15] LI H, SHI M, LIU X, et al. Uncertainty optimization of dental implant based on finite element method, global sensitivity analysis and support vector regression. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2019;233(2):232-243.
[16] BAHADIRLI G, YILMAZ S, JONES T, et al. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(5):e117-e126.
[17] MORIWAKI H, YAMAGUCHI S, NAKANO T, et al. Influence of Implant Length and Diameter, Bicortical Anchorage, and Sinus Augmentation on Bone Stress Distribution: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(4): e84-91.
[18] SAHIN SC. Static and Dynamic Stress Analysis of Standard- and Narrow-Diameter Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(4): e58-e68.
[19] CIDADE CP, PIMENTEL MJ, AMARAL RC,et al. Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:S1806-8324.
[20] LI X, CAO Z, QIU X, et al. Does matching relation exist between the length and the tilting angle of terminal implants in the all-on-four protocol? stress distributions by 3D finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7(3):240-248.
[21] GONDA T, YASUDA D, IKEBE K, et al. Biomechanical Factors Associated With Mandibular Cantilevers: Analysis With Three-Dimensional Finite Element Models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(6):e275-282.
[22] LV J, LIU C, LAN J, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of the location and diameter of implants on the stress distribution in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures under dynamic loads. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;31(6):552-556.
[23] TAKAHASHI T, SHIMAMURA I, SAKURAI K. Influence of number and inclination angle of implants on stress distribution in mandibular cortical bone with All-on-4 Concept. J Prosthodont Res. 2010;54(4):179-184.
[24] OZAN O, KURTULMUS-YILMAZ S. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):64-71.
[25] GENG JP, TAN KB, LIU GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(6):585-598.
[26] 宋少云,尹芳.有限元网格划分中的圣维南原理及其应用[J].机械设计与制造,2012(8):63-65.
[27] RISMANCHIAN M, BAJOGHLI F, MOSTAJERAN Z, et al. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(4):196-200.
[28] AYALI A, ALTAGAR M, OZAN O, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the All-on-4, M-4, and V-4 techniques in an atrophic maxilla: A 3D finite element analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2020;123:103880.
[29] LIU T, MU Z, YU T, et al. Biomechanical comparison of implant inclinations and load times with the all-on-4 treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2019;22(6):585-594.
[30] HSU YT, LIN GH, WANG HI. Effects of Platform-Switching on Peri-implant Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):e9-e24.
[31] DEL FABBRO M,BIANCHESSI C,DEL LUPO R,et al.Platform switching vs standard implants in partially edentulous patients using the Dental Tech Implant System: clinical and radiological results from a prospective multicenter study.Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(9):2233-2244.
[32] SHACKLETON JL, CARR L, SLABBERT JC, et al. Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71(1):23-26.
[33] CORREA S, IVANCIK J, ISAZA JF, et al. Evaluation of the structural behavior of three and four implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations by finite element analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2012;56(2):110-119.
[34] MCALARNEY ME, STAVROPOULOS DN. Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11(3):331-339.
[35] MCALARNEY ME, STAVROPOULOS DN. Theoretical cantilever lengths versus clinical variables in fifty-five clinical cases. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(3):332-343.
[36] DRAGO C. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(5):402-408.
[37] BALKAYA MC. Investigation of influence of different implant size and placement on stress distribution with 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Implant Dent. 2014;23(6):716-722.
[38] OGAWA T, DHALIWAL S, NAERT I, et al. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(7):525-531.
[39] SOUSA RM, SIMAMOTO-JUNIOR PC, FERNANDES-NETO AJ, et al. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(4): 750-760.
[40] BRANEMARK PI, SVENSSON B, VAN STEENBERGHE D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6(4):227-231. |