BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic vavle replacement and surgical aortic vavle replacement are the main treatment for aortic stenosis. However, the efficacy and prognosis between the two methods were still inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and prognosis of transcatheter aortic vavle repalcement and surgical aortic vavle replacement in the treatment of aortic stenosis with evidence-based medicine.
METHODS: We searched relevant literature from Chinese and English databases such as EMbase, Medline, PubMed, and VIP to retrieve randomized controlled trial studies. Data were analyzed by Revman 5.0 to compare short-term (30 days) and long-term (1 year) mortality, incidence of stroke, incidence of myocardial infarction, incidence of hemorrhage, incidence of renal damage and rate of pacemaker implantation.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Eight randomized controlled trials involving 6 147 patients were included in the final analysis. Among these patients, 3 136 patients received transcatheter aortic valve replacement (study group) and 3 011 patients underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (control group). There were no significant differences in mortality, incidence of stroke, incidence of myocardial infarction, and incidence of hemorrhage between study and control groups at 30 days post-surgery [OR=0.92, 95%CI (0.74, 1.13), Z=0.83, P > 0.05; OR=0.82, 95%CI (0.49, 1.38), Z=0.74, P > 0.05; OR=0.63, 95%CI (0.38, 1.05), Z=1.77, P > 0.05; OR=0.50, 95%CI (0.20, 1.26), Z=1.47, P > 0.05]. At 30 days post-surgery, the incidence of renal damage in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group [OR=0.43, 95%CI (0.33, 0.57), Z=5.89, P < 0.01], the rate of pacemaker implantation was significantly higher in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group [OR=4.77, 95%CI (1.36, 16.72), Z=2.94, P < 0.01]. There were no significant differences in mortality, incidence of stroke, and incidence of myocardial infarction at 1 year post-surgery between study and control groups [OR=0.93, 95%CI (0.81, 1.07), Z=1.02, P > 0.05; OR=1.00, 95%CI (0.81, 1.23), Z=0.02, P > 0.05; OR=0.88, 95%CI (0.61, 1.28), Z = 0.65, P > 0.05]. At 1 year post-surgery, the rate of pacemaker implantation in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group [OR=3.47, 95%CI (1.64, 7.34), Z=3.26, P < 0.01]. The results showed that the efficacy and prognosis of the two methods for the treatment of aortic stenosis were comparable, but the transcatheter aortic valve replacement treatment had less trauma and a higher rate of pacemaker implantation than the aortic valve replacement.