BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis has developed from posterior lumbar interbody fusion to bone graft fusion and internal fixation, which is widely applied in clinics.
OBJECTIVE: To systemically evaluate the clinical therapeutic efficacy of lumbar interbody fusion between cage and autograft alone for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis, and to provide evidence-based measures for clinical treatment.
METHODS: An online search of China Biological Medicine disk, PubMed, PQDT, Cochrane Library, Springerlink,MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was performed from March 1990 to December 2012. In addition, we hand-based searched Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord, Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, Orthopedic Journal of China, and Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery for clinical studies about the comparison of lumbar interbody fusion between cage and alone-autograft for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. The selected trails were screened out according to the criterion of inclusion and exclusion, and quality was evaluated. RevMan 5.1.5 software (Cachrane Library) was used for Meta analysis. The following indexes were used to compare the results: intraoperative blood loss, operative time, height of vertebral space, fusion rate, excellent and good rate, complication rate and operation fee.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: One prospective study and eight case-controlled retrospective studies were included, involving 585 patients. The results of Meta-analysis indicated that compared with autograft fusion, cage fusion showed no differences in operative time [MD=7.19, 95 %CI (-34.39, 48.77), P=0.73], intraoperative blood loss [MD=21.34, 95%CI (-139.56, 182.24), P=0.79], excellent and good rate [OR=1.53, 95%CI (0.93, 2.53), P=0.09], and complication rate [OR=0.94, 95%CI (0.51, 1.75), P=0.85]. The fusion rate was higher in cage fusion compared with autogaft fusion [OR=1.87, 95%CI (1.08, 3.25), P=0.03]. Cage fusion better maintained loss of the height of vertebral space [MD=0.03, 95%CI (0.01, 0.04)] and a higher operation fee [MD=0.92, 95%CI (0.30, 1.82), P=0.004] than autograft fusion. Both cage and autograft fusion are effective for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. Compared with autograft fusion, cage fusion has the higher fusion rate and higher operation fee, and significantly maintains the height of vertebral space. There was no difference in operative time, blood loss, excellent and good rate, and complication rate. Because of the lack of prospective articles and small sample size, large-sized randomized controlled studies are urgently needed to provide evidence.