Deltoid-splitting approach and deltopectoral approach in the repair of proximal humeral fracture: a meta-analysis

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.35.025

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies confirmed that compared with deltopectoral approach, deltoid-splitting approach for proximal humeral fractures has good therapeutic effects, but precise superiority remains poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects of deltopectoral approach and small incision deltoid-splitting approach in the repair of proximal humeral fractures using meta-analysis.
METHODS: We retrieved MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane library, Wanfang Database and PubMed by computer for articles on controlled trials of deltopectoral approach and small incision deltoid-splitting approach in the repair of proximal humeral fractures published from 2010 to 2014. Neer score, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, length of hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale score, fracture healing time, and Constant score were used as evaluation indexes of Meta analysis. RevMan 5.2 software was used for analysis.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Eventually nine articles were included, totally 721 patients, published from 2010 to 2014 years. There were eight in Chinese, and one in English. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with deltopectoral approach, deltoid-splitting approach in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures could shorten operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten length of incision, elevate Neer score and Constant score (P < 0.05). No significant difference in fracture healing time, hospitalization days, and Visual Analogue Scale score was detected between the two methods of surgical approach. These data indicated that compared with deltopectoral approach, deltoid-splitting approach in the repair of proximal humeral fracture has certain superiority. Deltoid-splitting approach can be firstly selected in the permit of hospital conditions.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：人工关节；骨植入物；脊柱；骨折；内固定；数字化骨科；组织工程

全文链接：

Key words: humeral fractures, deltoid muscle, meta-analysis, evidence-based medicine

CLC Number:

R318

Guo Hong-liang, Han Ya-jun, Yilihamu•Tuoheti. Deltoid-splitting approach and deltopectoral approach in the repair of proximal humeral fracture: a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2014, 18(35): 5723-5729.

Figures/Tables 5

References

[1] Helmy N, Hintermann B. New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 442:100-108.
[2] Buecking B, Mohr J, Bockmann B,et al. Deltoid-split or Deltopectoral Approaches for the Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472:1576-1585.
[3] 曲志国,崔玉玲,崔正宏.肱骨近端锁定钢板与传统钢板及交叉针治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的疗效比较[J].中国修复重建外科杂志, 2008,22(2):248-250.
[4] Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, et al. Cochrane Reviews’ Handbook4.2.1//the Cochrane Library. UK: John Wiley &Sons, Ltd,2004.
[5] Smith AM,Mardones RM,Sperling JW, et al. Early complications Of operatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:14-24.
[6] 尚咏,伍骥,赵旭红,等.小切口与传统术式治疗肱骨外科颈骨折疗效比较[J].山西医科大学学报,2010,41(3):265-267.
[7] 王述伟,苏山林,马象武,等. 两种手术入路空心螺钉固定治疗肱骨大结节撕脱骨折比较[J].中国民间疗法,2013,21(10):60-61.
[8] 米文,徐微.小切口入路与传统术式治疗肱骨外科颈骨折疗效比较[J].中国现代医生,2011,49(15):35-36.
[9] 陈之青,谢金兔,李坚.微创切口与经典大切口结合锁定钢板内固定治疗老年人肱骨近端骨折疗效比较[J].中国医师杂志, 2014, 16(3): 386-388.
[10] 白力承,顾邵,熊鹰,等.锁定加压钢板置入肱骨近端骨折的最理想位置：选择肩外侧三角肌劈开入路[J].中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(9):1453-1458.
[11] 覃开兵,周树权.小切口入路与传统术式治疗肱骨外科颈骨折疗效观察[J].现代诊断与治疗,2013,24(5):1042-1043.
[12] 王永强.两种不同手术入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效比较[J].中外健康文摘,2013,10(15):67-68.
[13] 白祥,黄建明,吴金平.不同手术入路治疗老年肱骨近端骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2011,14(6):671-673.
[14] 孙惠清,任亚军,张云庆,等. 锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2010,12(11):1082-1083.
[15] Gardner MJ, Voos JE, Wanich T, et al. Vascular implications of minimally invasive plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:602-607.
[16] 许林东,廖前德.MIPPO技术结合锁定加压钢板和传统内固定法治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效比较[J].中国医师杂志,2011,13(7): 956-958.
[17] Wu CH, Ma CH, Yeh JJ, et al. Locked Plating for Proximal Humeral Fractures: Differences Between the Deltopectoral and Deltoid-Splitting Approaches. J Trauma.2011;71: 1364-1370.
[18] 蔡俊丰,尹峰,祝建光,等.微创经皮钢板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中华创伤杂志,2010,26(7)：606-610．
[19] Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Dines JS, et al.The extended anterolateral acromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (434):123-129.
[20] 王俊生,武志兵.腋神经、桡神经与肱骨关系的应用解剖[J].创伤外科杂志,2003,5(1):64.
[21] 刘德荣,梁加利,陆耀刚.微创技术植入锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨干近端骨折[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2009,23(11):1282-1284.
[22] Chou YC, Tseng IC, Chiang CW, et al. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: comparisons between the deltopectoral and anterolateral deltoid-splitting approaches. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22: e1-e7.
[23] Hepp P, Theopold J, Voigt C, et al. The surgical approach for locking plate osteosynthesis of displaced proximal humeral fractures influences the functional outcome.J Shoulder Elbow Surg.2008;17:21-28.