Full-arch dental implant restoration versus sectional repair for dentulous mandible

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.29.017

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Full-arch dental implant and sectional repair are mainly for patients with edentulous mandible, both of which have their own characteristics. Full-arch dental implant restoration is suitable for the mandibular protection, but has unfavorable effects on the prosthesis; segmented restoration has better effects on the prosthesis.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of full-arch dental implant and sectional repair in edentulous mandible patients as well as patient satisfaction.
METHODS: Forty patients with edentulous mandible underwent full-arch dental implant restoration (n=28) or sectional repair (n=12). After restoration, all the patients were followed for 1 year. Clinical examination and X-ray observations were performed to evaluate the osseointegration rate.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The success rate of implants was 100% in the full-arch group and 98% in the sectional repair group, and there was no difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The successful restoration rates were 96.5% and 98% in the two groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). Bone resorption showed no difference between the two groups at 3-4 months after implantation or at 12 months after restoration. Patients in the two groups were all satisfied with masticatory function, fixed effect, subjective comfort and pronunciation are satisfactory, and there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). However, beautiful evaluation, maintenance convenience and total satisfaction were significantly higher in the full-arch
group than the sectional repair group (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that both full-arch dental implant restoration and sectional repair can have better effects on edentulous mandible, but the former one is superior to the latter one in the following aspects: beautiful evaluation, maintenance convenience and total satisfaction.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：组织构建；骨细胞；软骨细胞；细胞培养；成纤维细胞；血管内皮细胞；骨质疏松；组织工程

Key words: Dental Implants, Jaw, Edentulous, Dentures

CLC Number:

R318

Qin Tai-ping. Full-arch dental implant restoration versus sectional repair for dentulous mandible [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2015, 19(29): 4677-4681.

Figures/Tables 4

References

[1] 刘宝林.口腔种植学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.

[2] Ceruti P,Bryant SR,Lee JH,et al.Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report.J Can Dent Assoc.2010;76:a52.

[3] 赵铱民.口腔修复学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012.

[4] Cakarer S,Can T,Yaltirik M,et al.Complications associated with the ball, bar and Locator attachments for implant-supported overdenture.Med Oral Patol Oral CirBucal. 2011;16(7):e953-959.

[5] Slot W,Raghoebar GM,Vissink A,et al.A systematic review of implantsupported maxillary overdentures afterameanobservation period of at least 1 year.J Clin Periodontol.2010;37(1):98-110.

[6] 陈治清.口腔材料学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.

[7] Krennmair G, Seemann R, Weinländer M,et al.Comparison of Ball and Telescopic Crown Attachments in Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A 5-year Prospective Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2011;26(3):598-606.

[8] 丁熙,朱形好,陈宏,等.ITI球帽附着体种植覆盖义齿修复牙槽骨严重吸收下颌疗效观察[J].现代实用医学,2010,22(2):185-187．

[9] Meijer HJ,Raghoebar GM,Batenburg RH,et al.Mandibular overdentures supposedby two or four endosseous implants: a 10 year clinical trial.Clin Oral ImplantsRes.2009;20(7): 722-728．

[10] Ueda T,Kremer U,Katsoulis J,et al.Long-term results of mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: Implant survival, failures, and crestal bone level changes.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant.2011;26:365-372．

[11] 许建军,彭佳美.艾森格人格因素对全瓷修复满意度的影响[J].中国实用医药, 2012,23(7): 257-258.

[12] Turkyilmaz I,Company AM,McGlumphy EA.Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients.Gerodontology.2010;27(1):3-10.

[13] Wennerberg A,Albrektsson T.Current challenges in successful rehabilitation with oral implants.J Oral Rehabil.2011;38(4): 286-294.

[14] Wennerberg A,Albrektsson T.Current challenges in successful rehabilitation with oral implants.J Oral Rehabil.2011;38(4): 286-294.

[15] Heydecke G,Boudrias P,Awad MA,et al.Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses Clin.Oral Impl Res.2003;14(1):125-130.

[16] Zitzmann NU,Marinello CP.A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible.Int J Prosthodont.2002;15(1):65-72．

[17] Cune M,van Kampen F,van der Bilt A,et al. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.Int J Prosthodont.2005;8(2):99-105.

[18] David RB,John WU,James PC,et al.Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106(1): 12-22．

[19] Bilhan H,Geckili O,Mumcu E,et al.Maintenance requirements associated with mandibular implant overdentures: clinical results after first year of service.J Oral Implantol. 2011;37(6): 697-704．

[20] Shrivastava R,Srivastava R,Shigli K,et al.Assessment of dental anxiety and its correlation with denture satisfaction in edentulous patients.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012; 13(3):257-260.

[21] 王玉善,贾安琦.烤瓷修复患者满意度相关因素的调查研究[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2012, 39(5):582-585.

[22] Spinas E,Aresu M,Canargiu F.Prosthetic rehabilitation interventions in adolescents with fixed bridges: a 5-year observational study.Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(1):59-62.

[23] Ozhayat EB,Gotfaedsen K.Effect of treatment with fixed and removable dental prostheses . An oral health-related quality of life study.J Oral Rehabil.2012;39(1): 28-36.

[24] Shrivastava R,Srivastava R,Shigli K,et al.Assessment of dental anxiety and its correlation with denture satisfaction in edentulous patients.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012; 13(3):257-260.

[25] Brennan M,Houston F,O'Sullivan M,et al.Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(4):791-800.

[26] De Kok IJ,Chang KH,Lu TS,et al.Comparison of three-implant- supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26(2):415-426.

[27] Bortolini S,Natali A,Franchi M,et al.Implant-retained removable partial dentures: an 8-year retrospective study.J Prosthodont.2011;20:168-172.

[28] Belser UC,Grütter L,Vailati F, et al. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional,retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol.2009;80(1):140-151.

[29] Kimura A,Arakawa H,Noda K. Response shift in oral health-related quality of lifemeasurement in patients with partial edentulism.J Oral Rehhabil.2012;39:44-54.