Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Magnetic nanoparticles versus a commercial kit for apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism analysis

Wu Ting, Yi Li, Huang Ying, Wu Jun   

  1. Department of Neurology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen  518036, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2013-01-15 Revised:2013-01-21 Online:2013-09-17 Published:2013-09-17
  • Contact: Yi Li, Associate professor, Chief physician, Department of Neurology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China yilitj@hotmail.com
  • About author:Wu Ting★, Studying for master’s degree, Department of Neurology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China
  • Supported by:

    Economy, Trade and Information Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, No. 201002063*, JC201105180757A*

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Relative to blood samples, mouth swab samples are more beneficial for apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism analysis among large cohorts. However, agreement has not yet been reached about how to extract genomic DNA form mouth swab samples.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an appropriate method to extract genomic DNA form mouth swab samples, which are suitable for apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism analysis.
METHODS: Fifty mouth swab samples from patients with sporadic Alzheimer’s disease were collected. Magnetic nanoparticles and PicoDNA trace nucleic acid extraction kit were used to extract genomic DNA form mouth swab samples. And the purity and concentration of the genomic DNA extracted by the two methods were analyzed. Then PCR amplifications and DNA electrophoresis were performed to confirm whether the genomic DNA was able to amplify desired DNA fragments. DNA sequencing was applied to analyze apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Genomic DNA extracted by the two methods was of high purity. The concentration of genomic DNA extracted by magnetic nanoparticles was higher than by PicoDNA trace nucleic acid extraction kit, and the difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05). All the genomic DNA were able to performed PCR amplifications to obtain desired PCR products, but results of DNA electrophoresis showed that DNA fragments were more clear by nanoparticles method. The results of DNA sequencing were the same by the
two methods. The distribution of ε2, ε3, ε4 genotypes of apolipoprotein E gene was 6%, 71%, 23%, respectively. Magnetic nanoparticles were better than PicoDNA trace nucleic acid extraction kit for extracting genomic DNA form mouth swab samples for apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism analysis.

Key words: genes, nanoparticles, apolipoproteins E, Alzheimer disease

CLC Number: