Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2013, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 489-495.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.03.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Endo-Button versus absorbable interference screw fixation systems

Zhang Li-xuan1, Zhang Ying2, Guo Han-ming3   

  1. 1 Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong Province, China
    2 Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Orthopedics Hospital, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Area Command of Chinese PLA, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong Province, China
    3 Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou 516001, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2012-05-11 Revised:2012-06-13 Online:2013-01-15 Published:2013-01-15
  • Contact: Zhang Ying, Doctor, Chief physician, Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Orthopedics Hospital, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Area Command of Chinese PLA, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong Province, China Zhangying-doc@yahoo.com.cn
  • About author:Zhang Li-xuan★, Studying for master’s degree, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong Province, China zhangye988@163.com

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by using hamstring tendon autografts faces a lot of controversy and unknown factors.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the difference between the Endo-Button and the absorbable interference screw system in the ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: The experiment group (n=25) were reconstructed arthroscopically with semitendionosus and gracilis tendons by Endo-Button. The control group (n=20) were reconstructed by the absorbable interference screw. Same rehabilitation training was conducted in the two groups after reconstruction.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The patients were followed up from 6 to 21 months. Range of motion of the knee was normal in the two groups. In the Lachman test, there were two cases of positive Ⅰ in the experimental group and three cases of positive Ⅰ in the control group. However, all the patients showed negative results in the pivot shift test. The statistical difference in the Lysholm knee score was significant before and after the reconstruction, but there was no difference between the two groups. After analyzing the incidence rates of the tunnel enlargement, there was no statistical difference between the experiment group and the control. But the tunnel enlargement of the control group was bigger than that of the experimental group (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that the early clinical effects of Endo-Button and absorbable interference screw fixation systems are similar.

Key words: biomaterials, material mechanics and surface modification, anterior cruciate ligament, hamstring tendon, Endo-Button, absorbable interference screw, fixation, biomaterial photographs-containing paper

CLC Number: