Effects of hyaluronic acid combined with domestic porous tantalum on chondrocyte function under the dynamic environment

doi:10.12307/2023.025

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The effect of composite culture of scaffold materials and biological factors on chondrocyte function in different conditions is a hot topic in the research of tissue-engineered materials.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of hyaluronic acid combined with domestic porous tantalum on the function of rat chondrocytes under the dynamic environment.
METHODS: Knee chondrocytes of SD rats were extracted and cultured. Five groups of experiments were established as static culture group (group A), tantalum static group (group B), tantalum hyaluronic acid static group (group C), tantalum dynamic group (in the dynamic bottle rotation, two-way alternating forward and reverse rotation; the rotation angle is 40°, 40 r/h; group D), and tantalum hyaluronic acid dynamic group (in the dynamic bottle rotation, two-way alternating forward and reverse rotation; the rotation angle is 40°, 40 r/h; group E). The samples were continuously cultured for 7 days in the five groups. Cell morphology on materials was observed under a scanning electron microscope. The secretion of proteoglycan, type II collagen and SOX9 was detected by ELISA. The expression levels of proteoglycan, type II collagen and SOX9 protein were detected by western blot assay.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Scanning electron microscope observation showed that with the prolongation of static culture time, the number of chondrocytes in group C gradually increased, and gradually covered the surface of tantalum material. (2) On the 5th day of culture, the secretion of proteoglycan and type II collagen in group C was higher than that in groups A and B (P < 0.05). The secretion of SOX9 in group D was lower than that in group E (P < 0.05). The secretion of proteoglycan and type II collagen in group B was lower than that in group D (P < 0.05). The secretion of proteoglycan and type II collagen in group C was lower than that in group E (P < 0.05). (3) On the 5th day of culture, the expression of type II collagen in group C was higher than that in group B (P < 0.05), and the expression of proteoglycan and type II collagen in group D was higher than that in group B (P < 0.05). The expression levels of proteoglycan and type II collagen in group E were higher than those in group C (P < 0.05). (4) These findings suggest that the combination of domestic porous tantalum and hyaluronic acid can promote the secretion and protein expression of proteoglycan and type II collagen in chondrocytes. Under dynamic environment culture, the secretion and protein expression of proteoglycan and type II collagen are better than in static culture. SOX9 secretion and protein expression are not affected by the dynamic and static culture environments.

Key words: porous tantalum, hyaluronic acid, dynamic culture, chondrocytes, type II collagen, proteoglycan, SOX9

CLC Number:

Zhang Hui, Wang Jiayang, Wang Qian, Gan Hongquan, Wang Zhiqiang. Effects of hyaluronic acid combined with domestic porous tantalum on chondrocyte function under the dynamic environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2023, 27(3): 339-345.

Figures/Tables 13

References

[1] HUBBARD MJ. Articular debridement versus washout for degeneration of the medial femoral condyle. A five-year study. Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(2):217-219.
[2] JACKSON RW, DIETERICHS C. The results of arthroscopic lavage and debridement of osteoarthritic knees based on the severity of degeneration: a 4- to 6-year symptomatic follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(1):13-20.
[3] PAP T, KORB-PAP A. Cartilage damage in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis-two unequal siblings. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(10): 606-615.
[4] CHIANG H, KUO TF, TSAI CC, et al. Repair of porcine articular cartilage defect with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(3):584-593.
[5] JAMIL K, CHUA KH, JOUDI S, et al. Development of a cartilage composite utilizing porous tantalum, fibrin, and rabbit chondrocytes for treatment of cartilage defect. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;7(10):27.
[6] YAZDIMAMAGHANI M, RAZAVI M, VASHAEE D, et al. Porous magnesium-based scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;1(71):1253-1266.
[7] LIU Y, SU X, ZHOU S, et al. A modified porous tantalum implant technique for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: survivorship analysis and prognostic factors for radiographic progression and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(2):1918-1930.
[8] KHAN FA, ROSE PS, YANAGISAWA M, et al. Surgical Technique: Porous Tantalum Reconstruction for Destructive Nonprimary Periacetabular Tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(2):594-601.
[9] PATIL N, LEE K, GOODMAN SB. Porous Tantalum in Hip and Knee Reconstructive Surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009; 89(1):242-251.
[10] SALWOWSKA NM, BEBENEK KA, ŻĄDŁO DA, et al. Physiochemical properties and application of hyaluronic acid: a systematic review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(4):520-526.
[11] OZKAN FU, OZKAN K, RAMADAN S, et al. Chondroprotective effect of N-acetylglucosamine and hyaluronate in early stages of osteoarthritis-an experimental study in rabbits. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(3):352-357.
[12] MUJEEB A, MILLER AF, SAIANI A, et al. Self-assembled octapeptide scaffolds for in vitro chondrocyte culture. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(1): 4609-4617.
[13] ALAVI A, STUPACK DG. Cell survival in a three-dimensional matrix. Methods Enzymol. 2007;426:85-101.
[14] 郑欣欣,曹贵方.浅谈动物细胞体外三维培养技术[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2015(19):89-90.
[15] 张振,罗辉宇,曾炼.大鼠软骨细胞与兔软骨细胞的培养与比较[J].骨科,2020,11(4):323-328.
[16] 张辉,王少华,王茜,等. RGD多肽修饰多孔钽可激活MG63细胞整合素/黏着斑激酶信号通路[J].中国组织工程研究,2021,25(16): 2535-2540.
[17] 崔逸爽,赖振权,胡中岭,等. 骨形态发生蛋白7复合国产多孔钽对骨髓间充质干细胞向软骨分化及功能的影响[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(16):2478-2484.
[18] SUN X, YIN H, WANG Y, et al.In Situ Articular Cartilage Regeneration through Endogenous Reparative Cell Homing using a Functional Bone Marrow-specific Scaffolding System. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(45):38715-38728.
[19] 吴昊,李朝旭.关节软骨损伤修复的治疗进展[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(93):75-77.
[20] 尤奇,段小军,杨柳,等.临床应用软骨组织工程技术修复关节软骨缺损的进展[J].实用骨科杂志,2018,24(1):52-55.
[21] DI LUCA A, LONGONI A, CRISCENTI G, et al.Surface energy and stiffness discrete gradients in additive manufactured scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. Biofabrication. 2016;8(1):015014.
[22] YU X, QIAN G, CHEN S, et al. A tracheal scaffold of gelatin-chondroitin sulfate-hyaluronan-polyvinyl alcohol with orientated porous structure. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;159:20-28.
[23] 张辉,李亮,王茜,等.骨形成蛋白-7对多孔钽/软骨细胞复合物分泌功能以及Col-Ⅱ, AGG和Sox9基因表达的影响[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2015,47(2):219-225.
[24] WANG Q, ZHANG H, LI Q, et al. Biocompatibility and osteogenic properties of porous tantalum. Exp Ther Med. 2015;9(3):780-786.
[25] MARDONES RM, REINHOLZ GG, FITZSIMMONS JS, et al. Development of a biologic prosthetic composite for cartilage repair. Tissue Eng. 2005; 11(9-10):1368-1378.
[26] HEMSHEKHAR M, THUSHARA RM, CHANDRANAYAKA S, et al. Emerging roles of hyaluronic acid bioscaffolds in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;86:917-928.
[27] ORYAN A, KAMALI A, MOSHIRI A, et al. Chemical crosslinking of biopolymeric scaffolds: Current knowledge and future directions of crosslinked engineered bone scaffolds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;107: 678-688.
[28] JUHÁSZ ML, MARMUR ES. Temporal fossa defects: techniques for injecting hyaluronic acid filler and complications after hyaluronic acid filler injection. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015;14(3):254-259.
[29] SILVA CR, BABO PS, GULINO M, et al. Injectable and tunable hyaluronic acid hydrogels releasing chemotactic and angiogenic growth factors for endodontic regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2018;77:155-171.
[30] MARTÍNEZ-SANZ E, OSSIPOV DA, HILBORN J, et al. Bone reservoir: Injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel for minimal invasive bone augmentation. J Control Release. 2011;152(2):232-240.
[31] 沈雁,唐毅,李斯明,等.碱性成纤维细胞生长因子与透明质酸对培养兔软骨细胞的作用[J].中华创伤杂志,2000,16(6):337-339.
[32] 黄建荣,李卫平,沈慧勇.胰岛素样生长因子I与透明质酸对人关节软骨细胞的作用[J].中华生物医学工程杂志,2008,14(3):180-184.
[33] 拉希德,刘世清.透明质酸对体外培养大鼠退变关节软骨细胞的影响[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2007,28(2):177-180.
[34] 杜国辉,屈爱存,陈建英,等.透明质酸对关节软骨蛋白聚糖aggrecan的影响[J].中国生化药物杂志,2011(2):45-47.
[35] 高宗强,郭雄,陈君长,等.透明质酸对体外培养大骨节病软骨细胞Ⅱ型胶原和聚集蛋白聚糖mRNA表达的影响[J].中国组织工程研究,2009,13(46):9061-9065.
[36] MUJEEB A, MILLER AF, SAIANI A, et al. Self-assembled octapeptide scaffolds for in vitro chondrocyte culture. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(1): 4609-4617.
[37] 曲鹏玮,亓建洪,韩运宁,等.力学刺激对体外保存软骨活力影响的实验研究[J].中国医药生物技术,2018,13(3):243-248.
[38] FITZGERALD JB, JIN M, DEAN D, et al. Mechanical Compression of Cartilage Explants Induces Multiple Time-dependent Gene Expression Patterns and Involves Intracellular Calcium and Cyclic AMP. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(19):19502-19511.
[39] SHIEH AC, ATHANASIOU KA. Dynamic compression of single cells. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(3):328-334.
[40] WALDMAN SD, SPITERI CG, GRYNPAS MD, et al. Effect of Biomechanical Conditioning on Cartilaginous Tissue Formation in Vitr. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;2(1):101-105.
[41] CHEN C, TAMBE DT, DENG L, et al. Biomechanical properties and mechanobiology of the articular chondrocyte. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013;305(12):C1202-C1208.
[42] TOYODA T, SEEDHOM BB, KIRKHAM J, et al. Upregulation of aggrecan and type II collagen mRNA expression in bovine chondrocytes by the application of hydrostatic pressure. Biorheology. 2003;40:79-85.
[43] JEON JE, SCHROBBACK K, HUTMACHER DW, et al. Dynamic compression improves biosynthesis of human zonal chondrocytes from osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(8):906-915.