Finite element analysis of the effect of femoral component rotation on patellofemoral joint contact pressure in total knee arthroplasty

doi:10.12307/2022.164

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral joint complications are common after total knee arthroplasty. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component will affect the consistency of the patellofemoral joint, thus causing the changes of contact pressure and kinematics of the patellofemoral joint.
OBJECTIVE: To study the changes of patellofemoral joint contact pressure during knee flexion when femoral component was placed at different rotation angles by means of finite element analysis.
METHODS: The three-dimensional models of the knee joint were developed according to the CT and MRI scanning data of right knee of the volunteer. The femoral component was placed from 6° internal rotation to 9° external rotation (external rotation 3°, 6°, 9°, rotation 0°, internal rotation 3°, 6°) relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (the line between the medial femoral condyle groove and the most prominent point of the lateral femoral condyle) in 3° increments, while tibial component was 0° rotated relative to the Akagi (the line between the medial edge of the patellar tendon and the center of the posterior cruciate ligament) during the total knee arthroplasty. The finite element models of the knee were established by meshing the three-dimensional models. The patellofemoral joint contact pressure of each knee joint model was obtained during the flexion.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The patellofemoral joint contact pressure increased in all groups during the knee flexion. The contact pressure in the group of 3° external rotation femoral component was lower than that of 0° rotation group. The contact pressure of patellofemoral joint increased with the increase of external rotation degree of component when the degree of femoral component external rotation was greater than 3°. The contact pressures in the group of 3° internal rotation of femoral component and the group of 6° internal rotation were significantly higher than those of the other groups, and the highest was in the 6° internal group. (2) Results showed that during the total knee arthroplasty, 3° external rotation of femoral component relative to surgical transepicondylar axis may reduce the patellofemoral joint contact pressure, while excessive external rotation femoral component may lead to the increase of patellofemoral joint contact pressure. The internal rotation of femoral component should be avoided during the total knee arthroplasty. The imbalance of greater than 3° internal rotation may lead to the increase of patellofemoral joint contact pressure and increase the risk of prosthesis wear and knee pain.

Key words: knee, patellofemoral joint, total knee arthroplasty, finite element, femoral component, rotational alignment, contact pressure, biomechanics

CLC Number:

Huang Hao, Hong Song, Wa Qingde. Finite element analysis of the effect of femoral component rotation on patellofemoral joint contact pressure in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2022, 26(6): 848-852.

Figures/Tables 3

References

[1] RUSSELL RD, HUO MH, JONES RE. Avoiding patellar complications in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11 Supple A):84-86.
[2] PUTMAN S, BOUREAU F, GIRARD J, et al. Patellar complications after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1s):S43-s51.
[3] SHERVIN D, PRATT K, HEALEY T, et al. Anterior knee pain following primary total knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2015;6(10):795-803.
[4] MATZ J, LANTING BA, HOWARD JL. Understanding the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2019;62(1):57-65.
[5] DONELL S. Patellar tracking in primary total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(4):106-113.
[6] VICTOR J. Optimising position and stability in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(5):215-220.
[7] MURAKAMI AM, HASH TW, HEPINSTALL MS, et al. MRI evaluation of rotational alignment and synovitis in patients with pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(9):1209-1215.
[8] BELL SW, YOUNG P, DRURY C, et al. Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21(1):272-277.
[9] GUSTAFSON JA, ELIAS JJ, DEBSKI RE, et al. Development and validation of a kinematically-driven discrete element model of the patellofemoral joint. J Biomech. 2019;88:164-172.
[10] Michalik R, Rath B, Springorum HR, et al. Vorderer Knieschmerz nach Knie TEP-Implantation : Ursachen, Diagnostik und Therapie [Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty : Causes, diagnosis and treatment]. Orthopade. 2016;45(5):386-398.
[11] Popescu R, Haritinian EG, Cristea S. Relevance of Finite Element in Total Knee Arthroplasty - Literature Review.Chirurgia (Bucur). 2019;114(4): 437-442.
[12] WOICZINSKI M, STEINBRÜCK A, WEBER P, et al. Development and validation of a weight-bearing finite element model for total knee replacement.Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016;19(10):1033-1045.
[13] GU W, PANDY M. Direct Validation of Human Knee-joint Contact Mechanics Derived From Subject-specific Finite-element Models of the Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Joints. J Biomech Eng. 2019;142(7):1001.
[14] ALI AA, SHALHOUB SS, CYR AJ, et al. Validation of predicted patellofemoral mechanics in a finite element model of the healthy and cruciate-deficient knee. J Biomech. 2016;49(2):302-309.
[15] MATSUDA S, KAWAHARA S, OKAZAKI K, et al. Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(1):127-133.
[16] Mannan A, Smith TO. Favourable rotational alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty: A Level 1 systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee. 2016;23(2):186-190.
[17] CASTELLI CC, FALVO DA, IAPICCA ML, et al. Rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(1):4.
[18] JANG ES, CONNORS-EHLERT R, LIARNO S, et al. Accuracy of Reference Axes for Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computed Tomography-Based Study of 2,128 Femora. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101(23):e125 .
[19] WUERTELE N, BECKMANN J, MEIER M, et al. Posterior condylar resections in total knee arthroplasty: current standard instruments do not restore femoral condylar anatomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(8):1141-1147.
[20] FITZ DW, JOHNSON DJ, HARTWELL MJ, et al. Relationship of the Posterior Condylar Line and the Transepicondylar Axis: A CT-Based Evaluation. J Knee Surg. 2020;33(7):673-677.
[21] GRIFKA J, BAIER C, MADERBACHER G. Improved femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty: an anatomical study with optimized gap balancing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;24(5):103-107.
[22] JONES C, NAWAZ Z, HASSAN A, et al. The variability in the external rotation axis of the distal femur: an MRI-based anatomical study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26(2):199-203.
[23] SHETH NP, HUSAIN A, NELSON CL. Surgical Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Measured Resection, Gap Balancing, and Hybrid. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(7):499-508.
[24] SAFFARINI M, NOVER L, TANDOGAN R, et al. The original Akagi line is the most reliable: a systematic review of landmarks for rotational alignment of the tibial component in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27(4):1018-1027.
[25] THIELEMANN FW, KONSTANTINIDS L, HERGET GW, et al. Effect of Rotational Component Alignment on Clinical Outcome 5 to 7 Years After TKA With the Columbus Knee System. Orthopedics. 2016;39(3 Suppl):S50-55.
[26] PIETSCH M, HOFMANN S. Early revision for isolated internal malrotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6):1057-1063.
[27] WARSCHAWSKI Y, GARCEAU S, FRENKEL RUTENBERG T, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty for patellar dislocation in patients with malrotated TKA components. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(6):777-783.
[28] BÉDARD M, VINCE KG, REDFERN J, et al. Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(8):2346-2355.
[29] TERASHIMA T, ONODERA T, SAWAGUCHI N, et al. External rotation of the femoral component decreases patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(11):3266-3272.
[30] GROMOV K, KORCHI M, THOMSEN MG, et al. What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop. 2014;85(5):480-487.
[31] KIA M, WRIGHT TM, CROSS MB, et al. Femoral Component External Rotation Affects Knee Biomechanics: A Computational Model of Posterior-stabilized TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(1):113-123.