中国组织工程研究 ›› 2012, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (7): 1255-1258.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2012.07.027

• 组织构建与生物力学 tissue construction and biomechanics • 上一篇    下一篇

不同目标力矩时距小腿关节肌肉力觉的重测信度**☆

张秋霞,孙普庆,施永健   

  1. 苏州大学体育学院,江苏省苏州市  215021
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-19 修回日期:2011-07-26 出版日期:2012-02-12 发布日期:2012-02-12
  • 作者简介:张秋霞☆,女,1972年生,江苏省泰兴市人,汉族,2010年苏州大学毕业,博士,副教授,主要从事运动生物力学、体育测量与评价的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    2010年苏州市体育局体育科研局管课题资助项目(课题编号:TY2010-203);2011年苏州大学青年教师后期资助课题

Test-retest reliability of muscle force sense of the ankle joint under different target torque**☆

Zhang Qiu-xia, Sun Pu-qing, Shi Yong-jian   

  1. Physical Education College of Soochow University, Suzhou  215021, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2011-04-19 Revised:2011-07-26 Online:2012-02-12 Published:2012-02-12
  • About author:Zhang Qiu-xia☆, Doctor, Associate professor, Physical Education College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu Province, China zqxxqa@qq.com
  • Supported by:

     the Scientific Research Bureau of Physical Education, Suzhou City in 2010, No. TY2010-203*; the grant from Soochow University for Young Teachers in 2011*

摘要:

背景:目前对于距小腿关节矢状面内肌肉力觉的研究较为缺乏,距小腿关节肌肉力觉的测试没有统一的标准。
目的:通过分析不同目标力矩时距小腿关节矢状面内运动肌肉力觉的重测信度,探讨距小腿关节肌肉力觉的测量方法。
方法:选取跖屈肌群最大等长峰值力矩值的25%,50%和75%作为距小腿关节肌肉力觉的目标力矩值,测试距小腿关节肌肉对这些目标力矩值的复制能力;运用组内相关系数和测量的标准误来判断肌肉力觉的重复测量结果的一致性程度。
结果与结论:结果显示用来衡量关节肌肉力觉的可变误差和绝对误差的组内相关系数均大于0.75,而且测量的标准误相对较小;常数误差的组内相关系数均小于0.75,而且测量的标准误相对较大。在目标力矩较小时,用来衡量肌肉力觉的可变误差和绝对误差重测信度较好。

关键词: 肌肉力觉, 距小腿关节, 重测信度, 不同目标力矩

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There was no uniform criterion for muscle force sense test of the sagittal plane of the ankle joint.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the test-retest reliability of the ankle muscle force sense (MFS) under different target force. 
METHODS: The target force of the muscle was 25%, 50% and 75% maximal voluntary isometric contraction to measure MFS. Consistency degree of the repeated measures was evaluated by intra-class correlation (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM).
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Interclass correlation coefficients of variable errors and absolute errors in MFS were more than 0.75, and SEM of them were lower. ICCs of constant error of them were less than 0.75, and SEMs of them were greater. The test-retest reliability for variable errors and absolute errors of MFS was better when the target force was smaller.

中图分类号: