中国组织工程研究

中国组织工程研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (35): 6520-6524.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2010.35.015

• 数字化骨科 digital orthopedics • 上一篇    下一篇

踝关节位置觉和肌肉力觉的重测信度

张秋霞，张  林   

  1. 苏州大学体育学院，江苏省苏州市      215021
  • 出版日期:2010-08-27 发布日期:2010-08-27
  • 作者简介:张秋霞☆，女，1972年生，江苏省泰兴市人，汉族，苏州大学体育学院毕业，博士，副教授，主要从事运动生物力学、体育测量与评价研究。 zqxxqa@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    2010年苏州市体育局体育科研局管课题资助项目(TY2010-203)。

Test-retest reliability of position sense and muscle force sense of the ankle joint

Zhang Qiu-xia, Zhang Lin   

  1. Physical Education College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Online:2010-08-27 Published:2010-08-27
  • About author:Zhang Qiu-xia☆, Doctor, Associate professor, Physical Education College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu Province, China zqxxqa@qq.com
  • Supported by:

    a grant from Physical Education Scientific Research Department of Suzhou Physical Education in 2010, No. TY2010-203*

PDF

484

被引次数

26

摘要：

背景：目前对于踝关节矢状面内本体感觉的研究较为缺乏，踝关节本体感觉的测试没有统一的标准。
目的：分析踝关节矢状面内运动位置觉和力觉的重测信度。
方法：踝关节位置觉采用对踝关节跖屈5°的被动定位被动复位能力进行测试，肌肉力觉采用受试者踝关节对跖屈肌群25%最大等长峰值力矩值的复制能力进行测试；运用组内相关系数和测量的标准误来判断位置觉和力觉重复测量结果的一致性程度。
结果与结论：用来衡量关节位置觉和肌肉力觉的可变误差和绝对误差的组内相关系数均大于0.75，而且测量的标准误相对较小。常数误差的组内相关系数均小于0.75，而且测量的标准误相对较大。提示用来衡量位置觉和力觉的常数误差重测信度较差，用来衡量位置觉和力觉的可变误差和绝对误差重测信度较好。

关键词: 踝关节, 位置觉, 力觉, 重测信度, 误差

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There was no criterion for proprioception test of the sagittal plane of the ankle joint.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the test-retest reliability of the ankle joint position sense (JPS) and muscle force sense (MFS).
METHODS: The target angle of the ankle passively reposition was 5° of plantar flexion to measure JPS. The target force of the muscle was 25% maximal voluntary isometric contraction to measure MFS. Consistency degree of the repeated measures was evaluated by intra-class correlation (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM).
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Interclass correlation coefficients of variable errors and absolute errors in JPS and MFS were more than 0.75, and SEM of them were less. ICCs of constant error of them are less than 0.75, and SEMs of them are greater. The test-retest reliability for variable errors and absolute errors of JPS and MFS was better than constant error of them.

中图分类号: