中国组织工程研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (24): 4503-4506.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2010.24.031

• 组织构建学术探讨 tissue construction academic discussion • 上一篇    下一篇

生物力学测量与传统测量的比较

杨建鑫,马  超,张春林   

  1. 北京理工大学机械与车辆学院,北京市  100081
  • 出版日期:2010-06-11 发布日期:2010-06-11
  • 作者简介:杨建鑫☆,男,1983年生,安徽省界首市人,汉族,北京理工大学在读博士,主要从事生物力学方面的研究。 chitangzibi@hotmail.com

Comparison between biomechanical measurement and traditional measurement   

Yang Jian-xin, Ma Chao, Zhang Chun-lin   

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Online:2010-06-11 Published:2010-06-11
  • About author:Yang Jian-xin☆, Studying for doctorate, School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China chitangzibi@hotmail.com

摘要:

背景:生物力学的不断发展使生物力学测量技术也逐渐独立于传统测量方法,在生物力学各个领域都有与传统测量不同的性质与应用。
目的:综述国内外关于生物力学测量的最新研究以及与传统测量的比较研究。
方法:应用计算机检索Science Direct 数据库、Ei数据库1960-01/2009-10期间的相关文章,检索词为“biomechanics measurement”,并限定文章语言种类为English。同时计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库等1994-01/2009-10期间的相关文章,检索词为“生物力学测量”,并限定文章语言种类为中文。此外还手工查阅相关专著数部。纳入生物力学测量、运动生物力学、生物力学的发展状况、运动生物力学测量方法的研究。
结果与结论:在对比生物力学测量方法与传统测量方法的基础上,各自分析了两者的突出特点,并进行了差异性的研究。生物力学测量技术具有主动性、实时性以及局限性等不同的特点。生物力学的测试过程很多与医学、生物学密切相关,并提出传统测量、测试有利因素为生物力学各个数据的测量工作提供了借鉴意义,为更好地进行生物力学的研究工作提供了理论指导。

关键词: 生物力学测量, 生物力学分析, 传统测量, 综述文献, 组织工程

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The ongoing development of biomechanics gradually separates the measuring techniques of biomechanics from traditional measuring methods in their nature and application in various areas of biomechanics.
OBJECTIVE: A comparative study summarizing the latest research of biomechanical measurements and traditional measurements.
METHODS: A computer-based online search was conducted in Science Direct database and Ei database with the key words of “biomechanics measurement” in English from January 1960 to October 2009. Also the relevant articles were searched in Chinese Journal Full-text Database and CBMdisc with key words of “biomechanics measurement” in Chinese from January 1994 to October 2009. In addition, several relevant monographs in print were used. The study belongs to all the following aspects: biomechanics measurement, biomechanics of sports, development status of biomechanics and measuring methods of biomechanics of sports. 
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Biomechanical measurement and traditional measurement were compared in this research from both principles and practical applications. Biomechanical measurement was active, real-time, and limited, while it was highly correlated with medical science and biology. Besides studying the positive factors of the traditional measurement, this study was designed to try to apply them into the biomechanical measurement.

中图分类号: