Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2015, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (7): 1138-1142.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.07.028

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Guided bone regeneration technology used in upper anterior tooth restoration

Jiang Liu-hong1, Dong Ying2, Jing Xiang-dong1   

  1. 1Department of Stomatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China; 2Department of Stomatology, Clifford Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 511495, Guangdong Province, China
  • Online:2015-02-12 Published:2015-02-12
  • Contact: Jiang Liu-hong, Department of Stomatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China
  • About author:Jiang Liu-hong, Master, Attending physician, Department of Stomatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The membrane guided bone regeneration technique is based on the mechanical barrier theory of the membrane, which blocks the soft tissue ingrowth into the peri-implant bone defects that make osteoblasts grow well in the space under the membrane to form new bone and fill bone defects.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical aesthetic effect of guided bone regeneration technique on anterior tooth implantation.
METHODS: Seventy-four patients with successful single dental implantation were divided into control group and observation group at random, with 37 cases in each group. The control group was treated with phase II anterior tooth implantation with no bone increment. The observation group was treated with anterior tooth implantation implemented by the guided bone regeneration technology, and then bone meal was implanted at initial stable stage after dental implantation. Pink aesthetic indexes and peri-implant bone levels were compared between the two groups on the day after surgery, at 6 and 12 months after implant loading.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In both groups, the pink aesthetic indexes were significantly increased at 6 and 12 months after implant loading compared with the baseline levels (P < 0.05), but there was no difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 12 months after implant loading, in addition to the labial gingival margin levels and alveolar appearance, the rest pink aesthetic indexes were all increased significantly in the two groups compared with the baseline levels (P < 0.05), but there was no difference between the two groups (P > 0.05); there was also no difference in the marginal bone loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared to normal bone implant restoration, the clinical application of guided bone regeneration technique in upper anterior tooth restoration can achieve better results, but there is no significant difference between the two restoration methods. therefore further research and analysis.


中国组织工程研究
杂志出版内容重点:组织构建;骨细胞;软骨细胞;细胞培养;成纤维细胞;血管内皮细胞;骨质疏松组织工程


全文链接:

Key words: Dental Implantation, Esthetics, Dental, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal

CLC Number: