Individualized intervention and collective intervention effects on quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis patients

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.44.026

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: With the improvement of hemodialysis technology, the long-term survival rate of maintenance hemodialysis patients has been increased continually. Nowadays, how to improve the quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis patients has been aroused widespread concern, and gradually become the reliable indicator for comprehensive evaluation of the effect of hemodialysis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of individualized intervention and collective intervention on quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis patients.
METHODS: Eighty maintenance hemodialysis patients, who had accepted more than 3 months of dialysis, were randomly divided into two groups (40 cases in the experimental group and 40 patients in the control group). All the patients in the control group received 6 weeks of individualized intervention according to the pre-established schedule based on the hemodialysis routine care. Patients in the experimental group also have a period of six weeks of collective intervention according to the pre-established weekly schedule based on the hemodialysis routine care. The quality of life of the patients was evaluated with MOS 36-item short form health survey and kidney disease quality of life short form before and after intervention.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After the intervention, both of the experimental group and the control group achieved significantly greater improvement than before in MOS 36-item short form health survey and kidney disease quality of life short form (P < 0.01). The physical impact, overall health, emotional state, emotional impact, social function and energy of MOS 36-item short form health survey in the patients of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group after intervention (P < 0.01); and the social quality, sleep, social support and patient satisfaction of kidney disease quality of life short form in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.01). The results show that both individualized intervention and the collective intervention based on the individualized intervention are effective in improving quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis patients and the collective intervention can better improve the quality of life from physical, psychological and social aspects.

Key words: nephrosis, renal dialysis, hemodiafiltration, renal replacement therapy, behavioral medicine

CLC Number:

R394.2

Cui Yan, Wei Li-li, Li Lin, Wang Xiang-hua, Wang Jing-yuan. Individualized intervention and collective intervention effects on quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2013, 17(44): 7815-7820.

Figures/Tables 4

References

[1]左力,王梅.我国面临快速增长的终末期肾病治疗负担[J].中国血液净化,2010,9(1): 41-49.
[2]肖月,隋宾艳,赵琨.我国终末期肾病现状及透析技术的应用、费用及支付情况分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2011,4(5):29-33.
[3]马祖等,郑智化,张涤华,等.血液透析患者生存质量的多中心研究[J].中国血液净化,2004,3(7):380-384.
[4]王苏杭,董春锋.北京基层医院维持性血液透析患者生活质量及其影响因素分析[J].医学综述,2013,19(11):2084-2086.
[5]陈玲,杨连招.授权教育对维持性血液透析患者饮食自我管理的影响[J].全科护理,2013, 11,5(A):1159-1160.
[6]中国医院协会血液净化中心管理分会血液透析登记组.我国面临快速增长的终末期肾病治疗负担[J].中国血液净化,2010, 9(1):47-49.
[7]Qureshi AR, Alvestrand A, Divino-Filho JC, et al. Inflammation, malnutrition, and cardiac disease as predictors of mortality in hemodialysis patients.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13 Suppl 1: S28-36.
[8]王祥花,崔莉,崔岩,等.血液透析患者社会回归及生活质量调查[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(44):8317-8320.
[9]Hecking M, Karaboyas A, Saran R, et al. Predialysis serum sodium level, dialysate sodium, and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(2): 238-248.
[10]邢伟,吴艳青,宋延锋,等.维持性血液透析患者的健康教育干预与生活质量[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(5): 901-904.
[11]付凤齐,王志稳,万巧琴.社会支持和应对方式对维持性血液透析患者生存质量的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(2):130-132.
[12]姜敏敏,李鲁.SF-36量表在血透患者中的性能测试[J].中国行为医学科学,2003,12 (1):31.
[13]Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB ,et al. Validating the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: New Outcome Measure for Primary Care. British medical juorna.1992; 305(6846): 160-164.
[14]Maor Y, King M, Olmer L, et al. A comparison of three measures, the time trade-off technique, global healthy related quality of life and the SF-36 in dialysis patients. Joumey of Clinical Epidemiology.2001;54(6):565-570.
[15]Joshi VD, Mooppil N, Lim JF. Validation of the kidney disease quality of life-short form: a cross-sectional study of a dialysis-targeted health measure in Singapore. BMC Nephrol. 2010;11:36.
[16]罗世香, 苏兰若, 王爱平.护理干预对维持性血液透析病人自我管理行为的影响[J].护理研究,2007,21(6B):1526-1528.
[17]黄小妹,张英,张黎民,等.武汉地区维持性血液透析病人生活质量及影响因素[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2005,21(2):88-89.
[18]蔡惠群,陈恒燕,陈亮明等.临床护理路径在维持性血液透析患者护理中的应用[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(11):358-359.
[19]Shahgholian N, Tajdari S, Nasiri M. Reviewing and comparing self-concept in patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Resh. 2012; 17(2): 85-90.
[20]陈玲,梁颖,侯诗箐,等. 维持性血液透析患者自我管理行为的护理干预[J]. 中国临床保健杂志,2013,16(3):321-323.
[21]李敏,刘璐,汪茂宝,等. 细节护理干预在尿毒症血液透析患者中的应用价值[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2013,33(6):1279-1281.
[22]王金兰. 人性化护理干预在尿毒症并发左心衰患者血液透析中的应用[J]. 中外医疗,2013,32(15):158-159.
[23]刘雁凌,刘丹,叶艳,等.人性化护理干预在尿毒症并发左心衰患者血液透析中的应用[J].中国医药导刊,2012,14(5):890-893.
[24]李俊,霍桢,俞翔,等.认知行为团体治疗对维持性血液透析患者心理干预的疗效[J].陕西医学杂志,2013,31(5):553-555.
[25]钱荣. 认知行为干预对终末期肾衰患者自我管理行为的影响[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2013,29(2):296-297.
[26]Aghakhani N, Samadzadeh S, Mafi TM, et al. The impact of education on nutrition on the quality of life in patients on hemodialysis: a comparative study from teaching hospitals.Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplantation. 2012; 23(1): 26-30.
[27]王苏容,朱湘竹,范亚平.终末期肾病维持性血液透析108例心理状况及生活质量分析[J].南通医学院学报,2009,29(6):466-467.
[28]Zamarron C, Garcia Paz V, Morete E, et al. Association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea conse- quences. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(4):671-682.
[29]程远娟.实施家属健康教育对维持性血液透析患者生存质量影响的研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2012.
[30]Hruby Z, Stanek-Piotrowska M, Turek J,et al. The clinicopathological determinants of native arteriovenous fistula failure in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2013;22(4):495-500.
[31]Song MK, Gilet CA, Lin FC, et al. Characterizing daily life experience of patients on maintenance dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(11):3671-3677.
[32]Tezel A, Karabulutlu E, Sahin O. Depression and perceived social support from family in Turkish patients with chronic renal failure treated by hemodialysis. J Res Med Sci. 2011; 16(5):666-673.
[33]Jung YS, You G, Shin HS, et al. Relationship between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and total lymphocyte count and mortality of hemodialysis patients. Hemodial Int. 2013 Aug 14.
[34]Xu Y, Chen Y, Li D, et al. Hypertension, fluid overload and micro inflammation are associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2013 Aug 1.
[35]Su CT, Yabes J, Pike F, et al. Changes in Anthropometry and Mortality in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients in the HEMO Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Jul 13.