Effects of re-vitrification at blastocyst stage on histone epigenetic modification and pluripotency gene expression in mouse embryos

doi:10.12307/2022.733

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In assisted reproduction work, re-vitrification can effectively improve embryo utilization. Our previous research results show that the secondary vitrification at different developmental stages significantly affects embryo development, but the mechanism is still unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the potential mechanism of secondary vitrification in different periods affecting embryo development potential.
METHODS: These 2-cell embryos fertilized in vivo were collected and cultured in vitro, and randomly divided into four groups: control, vitrified at the 8-cell stage (8C), vitrified at the 8-cell stage, and re-vitrified at the 8-cell (8C-8C) or early blastocyst stage (8C-BL). Immunofluorescence was utilized to analyze changes in the expression levels of H3K4me3, H3K9me2, and H3K9AC at the blastocyst stage. Real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR was applied to analyze changes in the expression levels of pluripotency genes Cdx2, Oct4, and Sox2.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Immunofluorescence results showed that first and second freezing led to a significant increase in the levels of H3K9me2 (P < 0.01) and H3K9AC (P < 0.000 1) at the blastocyst stage. (2)The first freezing did not affect the level of H3K4me3, but the level of H3K4me3 in the second freezing decreased significantly, and the decrease was more serious in the 8C-BL group (P < 0.000 1). (3) The results of real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR showed that the first freezing and the second freezing at the 8-cell stage did not affect the expression levels of embryo pluripotency genes Cdx2, Oct4 and Sox2, but the expression levels of embryo pluripotency genes in the 8C-BL group changed significantly. The level of Oct4 decreased significantly (P < 0.01), while the expression level of Cdx2 (P < 0.001) and Sox2 (P < 0.01) increased significantly. (4) The results show that the secondary vitrification has a certain negative impact on the epigenetics of mouse embryos, and the secondary freezing at the blastocyst stage significantly affects the H3K4me3 modification and pluripotency-related gene expression levels.

Key words: early embryos, re-vitrification, mouse, assisted reproductive, histone epigenetics, pluripotency gene

CLC Number:

Wang Jianwu, Zhao Yanhua, Li Jingyu, Wang Jiaqiang. Effects of re-vitrification at blastocyst stage on histone epigenetic modification and pluripotency gene expression in mouse embryos[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2022, 26(31): 5047-5052.

Figures/Tables 4

References

[1] TROUNSON A, MOHR L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983;305(5936): 707-709.
[2] MACNAMEE M, WICK K, RAINSBURY P, et al. How robust are early human embryos? Lancet. 1990;336(8715):636.
[3] YOKOTA Y, YOKOTA H, YOKOTA M, et al. Birth of healthy twins from in vitro development of human refrozen embryos. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76(5):1063-1065.
[4] HIRAOKA K, HIRAOKA K, HORIUCHI T, et al. Case report: successful delivery following the transfer of a human re-vitrified day-7 spontaneously hatched blastocyst developed from vitrified cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26(7):405-409.
[5] TAYLOR TH, PATRICK JL, GITLIN SA, et al. Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(1):59-64.
[6] LI J, XIONG S, ZHAO Y, et al. Effect of the Re-Vitrification of Embryos at Different Stages on Embryonic Developmental Potential. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:653310.
[7] BEDZHOV I, GRAHAM SJ, LEUNG CY, et al. Developmental plasticity, cell fate specification and morphogenesis in the early mouse embryo. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1657):20130538.
[8] MURAI S, KATAGIRI Y, YAMASHITA S. Maturation-associated Dbf4 expression is essential for mouse zygotic DNA replication. Dev Growth Differ. 2014;56(9):625-639.
[9] PUSCHECK EE, AWONUGA AO, YANG Y, et al. Molecular biology of the stress response in the early embryo and its stem cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;843:77-128.
[10] MAJIDI GHARENAZ N, MOVAHEDIN M, et al. Effects of Re-Vitrification of Mouse Morula and Early Blastocyst Stages on Apoptotic Gene Expression and Developmental Potential. Cell J. 2018;19(4):614-619.
[11] EL-GAYAR M, GAULY M, HOLTZ W. In vitro and in vivo survival of mouse blastocysts after repeated vitrification with the open pulled straw (OPS) method. Cryo Letters. 2010;31(6):454-459.
[12] VITALE NJ, MYERS MW, DENNISTON RS, et al. In-vitro development of refrozen mouse embryos. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(2):310-316.
[13] NOHALEZ A, MARTINEZ CA, PARRILLA I, et al. Eventual re-vitrification or storage in liquid nitrogen vapor does not jeopardize the practical handling and transport of vitrified pig embryos. Theriogenology. 2018; 113:229-236.
[14] MAJIDI GHARENAZ N, MOVAHEDIN M, MAZAHERI Z, et al. Alternation of apoptotic and implanting genes expression of mouse embryos after re-vitrification. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14(8):511-518.
[15] ZHENG X, CHEN Y, YAN J, et al. Effect of repeated cryopreservation on human embryo developmental potential. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(6):627-632.
[16] MURAKAMI M, EGASHIRA A, MURAKAMI K, et al. Perinatal outcome of twice-frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a clinical follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2648-2650.
[17] RIVERA RM, ROSS JW. Epigenetics in fertilization and preimplantation embryo development. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2013;113(3):423-432.
[18] VASTENHOUW NL, SCHIER AF. Bivalent histone modifications in early embryogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;24(3):374-386.
[19] SHA QQ, DAI XX, JIANG JC, et al. CFP1 coordinates histone H3 lysine-4 trimethylation and meiotic cell cycle progression in mouse oocytes. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3477.
[20] LIU X, WANG C, LIU W, et al. Distinct features of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 chromatin domains in pre-implantation embryos. Nature. 2016;537(7621):558-562.
[21] WU Y, DONG J, FENG S, et al. Maternal UHRF1 Is Essential for Transcription Landscapes and Repression of Repetitive Elements During the Maternal-to-Zygotic Transition. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;8:610773.
[22] STÄUBLI A, PETERS AH. Mechanisms of maternal intergenerational epigenetic inheritance. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2021;67:151-162.
[23] ZHAO XM, DU WH, HAO HS, et al. Effect of vitrification on promoter methylation and the expression of pluripotency and differentiation genes in mouse blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev. 2012;79(7):445-450.
[24] BAKHTARI A, RAHMANI HR, BONAKDAR E, et al. The interfering effects of superovulation and vitrification upon some important epigenetic biomarkers in mouse blastocyst. Cryobiology. 2014;69(3):419-427.
[25] FACCIOL A, TSANG B, GERLAI R. Alcohol exposure during embryonic development: An opportunity to conduct systematic developmental time course analyses in zebrafish. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;98: 185-193.
[26] NICHOLS J, ZEVNIK B, ANASTASSIADIS K, et al. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell. 1998;95(3):379-391.
[27] CHOI DH, LEE KE, PARK J, et al. Cell-Permeable Oct4 Gene Delivery Enhances Stem Cell-like Properties of Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9357.
[28] TAKADA Y, IYYAPPAN R, SUSOR A, et al. Posttranscriptional regulation of maternal Pou5f1/Oct4 during mouse oogenesis and early embryogenesis. Histochem Cell Biol. 2020;154(6):609-620.
[29] COTICCHIO G, LAGALLA C, STURMEY R, et al. The enigmatic morula: mechanisms of development, cell fate determination, self-correction and implications for ART. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(4):422-438.
[30] MIHAJLOVIĆ AI, BRUCE AW. The first cell-fate decision of mouse preimplantation embryo development: integrating cell position and polarity. Open Biol. 2017;7(11):170210.
[31] NIWA H, TOYOOKA Y, SHIMOSATO D, et al. Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell. 2005;123(5): 917-929.