Proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw fixation for intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: complication rate in 12-month follow-up

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.44.017

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Internal fixation has been shown to decrease intertrochanteric fracture complications in the clinic and to improve quality of life of patients. The major method widely used in the clinic is the fixation of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical effects of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.

METHODS: A total of 60 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were randomly divided into proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw groups (n=30), and they respectively received proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw fixation.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Compared with the dynamic hip screw group, operative time, blood loss, the incidence of complications one year after repair, fracture healing time and complications were lower in the proximal femoral nail group (P < 0.05). After repair, the excellent and good rate of Harris hip scores was higher (P < 0.05). No significant difference was detected in healing time of wound between the two groups (P > 0.05). Results verified that compared with the dynamic hip screw fixation, the clinical effects of proximal femoral nail fixation were better, more safe and reliable in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：人工关节；骨植入物；脊柱；骨折；内固定；数字化骨科；组织工程

全文链接：

Key words:

line-height: 11pt, margin: 0pt 74.3pt 0pt 0pt, mso-line-height-rule: exactly" class="MsoNormal" align="left">font-size: 8pt, mso-font-kerning: 0pt" lang="EN-US">hip joint, prostheses and implants, osteoporosis, hip prosthesis

CLC Number:

R318

Shen Hong-jiang, Guo Liang. Proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw fixation for intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: complication rate in 12-month follow-up[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2014, 18(44): 7146-7150.

Figures/Tables 4

References

[1]刘奕,朱炯.DHS和PFN治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折的比较分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(12):913-914.
[2]赖宪良,李峰,刘东旭,等.防旋型股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折疗效比较[J].中国医师进修杂志,2011, 34(26): 70-72.
[3]王飞,刘克敏,刘四海,等.三种手术方法治疗老年人股骨转子间骨折疗效分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2013,32(8): 853-856.
[4]冷云飞,于沈敏.DHS和PFN内固定治疗老年不稳定性股骨转子间骨折疗效比较[J].山东医药,2009,49(2):80-82.
[5]周立金,吴继功,陈晓明,等.股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(33):146-148.
[6]Heini PF, Franz T, Fankhauser C, et al. Femoroplasty -augmentation of mechanical properties in the osteoporotic proximal femur: a biomechanical investigation of PMMA reinforcement in cadaver bones. Clin Biomech. 2004;19(5): 506-512.
[7]Hua Z. Experience of surgical treatment on comminuted intertrochanteric fractures in 98 patients. Qiqihaer Yixueyuan Xuebao. 2013;80(2):118-124.
[8]Kitamura S, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S, et al. Functional outcome after hip fracture in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;5(348): 29-36.
[9]马晓程,杨彬,谢鸣,等.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折的疗效对比研究[J].中国医药导刊,2014, (1):5-8.
[10]Li YJ, Li ZB, Yu WH, et al. Case-control study on dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2013;26(12):977-980.
[11]O’Neill F, McGloughlin T, Lenehan B, et al. Influence of implant design on the method of failure for three implants designed for use in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: the dynamic hip screw (DHS), DHS blade and X-BOLT. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013;39(3):249-255.
[12]吴建国,谭生福.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床研究[J].中国医药导报,2012, 9(24):50-56.
[13]Yang YH, Wang YR, Jiang SD, et al. Proximal femoral nail antirotation and third-generation Gamma nail: which is a better device for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures? Singapore Med J. 2013;54(8):446-450.
[14]Kang J, He T, Deng J. Comparison on the curative effect of the treatment of intertroc anteric fracture between the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the dynamic hip screw. Shiyong Guke Zazhi. 2013;6(8):4-9.
[15]Han FS, Guo FX, Zeng XT, et al. Comments on" Anti-rotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies" of L. Shen, Y. Zhang, Y. Shen, Z. Cui published in Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99: 377-83. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(2):259.
[16]吴祖耀,吴吉悦,杨松.不同手术固定方式治疗股骨转子间并转子下骨折的临床疗效观察[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2013, 10(5):49-53.
[17]顾骏,刘大林.DHS治疗股骨转子间骨折32例临床体会[J].河南中医,2013,33(B04):110-111.
[18]张善征,钱军,方美园,等.髓内钉与锁定钢板内固定治疗老年股骨转子问骨折比较[J].浙江临床医学,2013,15(10): 1459-1461.
[19]Zhu QL, Yan MH, Zhao LL, et al. Analysis of treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture of femur with the locking compression plate (LCP). Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011; 24(5):378-381.
[20]沈宁江,宋世锋,王广积,等.不同手术方法治疗老年股骨转子间骨折疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(10): 914-916.
[21]胡元武,杨华三,潘洪毅,等.PFNA、PF-LCP和人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的比较分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2013,28(10):955-956.
[22]余颖锋,谢文伟,姚汉刚,等.股骨近端锁定解剖钢板和PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间粉碎性骨折的疗效比较[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(4):33-36.
[23]丁强,王孝辉,阮成群,等.辅助短钢板内固定治疗不稳定股骨转子间骨折的临床观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2013, 28(10): 920-922.
[24]Yeung M, Bhandari M. Uneven global distribution of randomized trials in hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83(4):328-333.
[25]朱一鹏,秦磊.骨质疏松高龄患者转子间骨折的PFNA治疗观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2013,22(25):2779-2780, 2838.
[26]李杰文,肖立军,刘俊.股骨转子间骨折手术方案的选择与疗效分析[J].检验医学与临床,2013,10(16):2165-2167.
[27]李强,王跃文,刘瑞,等.老年股骨转子间骨折内固定治疗策略及疗效分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2013,10(5):45-48.
[28]邵季超,马永强,李静,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与滑动加压髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折观察[J].临床误诊误治,2013,26(9): 43-46.
[29]唐广满,许科峰,肖俊,等.新型微创动力髋钢板治疗股骨转子间不稳定型骨折的生物力学研究[J].创伤外科杂志, 2013,15(6): 539-542.
[30]Sandberg O, Aspenberg P. Different effects of indomethacin on healing of shaft and metaphyseal fractures. Acta Orthop. 2014 [Epub ahead of print].
[31]Valentini R, Martino M, Piovan G, et al. Proximal cut-out in pertrochanteric femural fracture.Acta Biomed. 2014;85(2): 144-151.
[32]Biber R, Bail HJ. Retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014;26(5):438-454.
[33]Queally JM, Harris E, Handoll HH, et al. Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014[Epub ahead of print].
[34]Rether JR, Höntzsch D. Femoral nailing using a helical nail shape (LFN(®).Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014;26(5):487- 496.
[35]Cha SM, Shin HD, Kim KC, et al. Does fracture affect the healing time or frequency of recurrence in a simple bone cyst of the proximal femur? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(10):3166-3176.
[36]Seker A, Kara A, Seckin MF, et al. Bilateral intertrochanteric and femoral diaphyseal fractures with unilateral proximal tibial fracture: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5(8):509-512.
[37]Gary JL, Munz JW, Burgess AR. "Push-past" reaming as a reduction aid with intramedullary nailing of metadiaphyseal and diaphyseal femoral shaft fractures. Orthopedics. 2014; 37(6):393-396.