Treatment of Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures with 3D printing preoperative planning combined with double reverse traction device

doi:10.12307/2022.796

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In the operation of Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures, the use of double reverse traction device has solved the problems of the traditional operation, such as large trauma and poor surgical effect, and has been popularized and applied in clinic to a certain extent. 3D printing technology has advantages in assisting preoperative assessment of fracture and fracture reduction planning.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of the treatment of Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures with 3D printing preoperative planning combined with double reverse traction device.
METHODS: From March 2018 to March 2020, 46 patients (25 males and 21 females, aged 19-83 years) with Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures were admitted to the Department of Orthopedics, Zhongshan Chinese Medicine Hospital. All patients were assigned to two groups. Among them, 23 cases in the observation group were treated with 3D printing preoperative planning combined with double reverse traction device, and 23 cases in the control group were treated with routine double reverse traction minimally invasive operation. The data of the two groups were compared, including the total operation time, the times of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, and the time of fracture reduction, and the data of the clinical rehabilitation indexes, including the visual analogue scale scores of the patients before and after treatment, the degree of swelling of the affected limb and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Knee function (hospital for special surgery knee score) and motor function (Fugl-Meyer assessment) scores were compared between the two groups in 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The operation time, fracture reduction time, blood loss, and fluoroscopy times were less in the observation group than those in the control group (P < 0.05). (2) The postoperative visual analogue scale score, the degree of swelling, and the incidence of complications were lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P < 0.05). (3) There was no significant difference in Fugl-Meyer assessment scores and hospital for special surgery knee score knee function scores between the observation group and the control group at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). (4) It is a safe and effective method to treat Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures with 3D printing preoperative planning combined with double reverse traction device. It can shorten the operation time and the fracture reduction time, reduce the blood loss, reduce the postoperative pain and swelling, and lower extremity venous thrombosis and other complications.

Key words: fracture of tibial plateau, double reverse traction device, 3D printing technology, preoperative planning, curative effect analysis

CLC Number:

He Guowen, Hu Baijun, Gao Dawei, Chen Liang. Treatment of Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures with 3D printing preoperative planning combined with double reverse traction device[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2022, 26(36): 5764-5769.

Figures/Tables 8

References

[1] 邵佳申,郑占乐,吕红芝,等.反牵引微创治疗后外侧胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,3(5):302-305.
[2] 陈美凯, 许一凡, 陈雪荣. 胫骨平台骨折临床分型研究进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(2):222-224.
[3] 廖志坚,曾小青,邹建生.内外侧联合入路对SchatzkerⅤ型、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的治疗效果分析[J]. 当代医学,2021,27(3):183-184.
[4] 许多红,赵光宇.关节镜联合经皮微创锁定钢板固定治疗30 例胫骨平台骨折的临床效果[J].上海医药,2017,38(7):33-35.
[5] 苏喧,张英泽.双反牵引微创复位固定治疗胫骨平台骨折[J].中国医药学,2016,6(5):1-3.
[6] 郭杰坤,刘国强,曾令国,等.双反牵引复位微创内固定治疗老年Schatzker Ⅳ型胫骨平台粉碎性骨折的临床疗效观察[J].现代医院, 2021,21(4):627-628+632.
[7] 肖占宇,连涛,崔国航.双反牵引微创复位植骨内固定治疗SchatzkerⅡ-Ⅳ型胫骨平台骨折的效果观察[J].微创医学,2019, 14(5):677-679.
[8] HUANG H, HSIEH MF, ZHANG G, et al. Improved accuracy of 3D-printed navigational template during complicated tibial plateau fracture surgery. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015;38:109-117.
[9] 胡栢均,高大伟,吴宇峰,等.双反牵引架辅助微创治疗难治性胫骨平台骨折临床价值研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(9):1090-1093.
[10] GROSS BC, ERKAL JL, LOCKWOOD SY, et al. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem. 2014;86(7):3240-3253.
[11] 魏建仝,邹永刚,钱军,等. 3D打印技术在骨科临床诊疗中的应用[A]. 中国自动化学会.2020中国自动化大会(CAC2020)论文集[C].中国自动化学会:中国自动化学会,2020:7.
[12] INSALL JN, RANAWAT CS, AGLIETTI P, et al.A comparison of four models of total knee- replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58(6):754-765.
[13] 陈瑞全,吴建贤,沈显山.中文版Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表的最小临床意义变化值的研究[J].安徽医科大学学报,2015(4):519-521,522.
[14] 刘佩雷,张乐,彭成,等. 3D打印联合关节镜微创治疗胫骨平台骨折[J].实用医学杂志,2021,37(3):353-357.
[15] MTHETHWA J,CHIKATE A. A review of the management of tabial plateau frature.Musculoskelet Surg.2018;102(2):119 -127.
[16] 旦锋,谢鹏,阮文辉,等.双钢板内固定治疗胫骨平台 Schatzker Ⅴ、Ⅵ骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2019,22(4):489-491.
[17] 王友良,冯庆虎,衣龙云,等.前正中入路双钢板固定在Schatzker分型Ⅴ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折中的研究应用[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2021,18(1):43-46+50.
[18] RAZA A, KUMAR S, KUMAR D, et al. Complex Tibial Plateau Fractures: Primary Fixation Using the Ilizarov External Fixator. A Two-year Study at Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan. Cureus. 2019;11(8):e5375.
[19] 冯仕华,陈转,郑开达.双反牵引微创复位治疗胫骨平台骨折的效果分析及膝关节功能影响[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(23):4230-4231.
[20] 鲍飞龙,刘涛,亢世杰,等.双反牵引装置治疗Schatzker分型Ⅴ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的优势[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018, 4(5):266-270.
[21] 魏学忠,丁少成,曹家俊.双钢板结合克氏针治疗SchatzkerⅤ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2020,23(3):430-432.
[22] 张擎柱,万乾,张义,等.3D打印技术辅助改良后内侧倒L 入路切开复位内固定术治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2018,32(11):57-59.
[23] GIANNETTI S, BIZZOTTO N, STANCATI A, et al. Minimally invasive fixation in tibial plateau fractures using an pre-operative and intra-operative real size 3D printing. Injury.2017;48(3):784-788.
[24] ATESOK K, SCHEMITSCH EH.Computer-assisted trauma surgery.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:247-258.
[25] 邵佳申,常恒瑞,郑占乐,等. 3D打印辅助手术治疗胫骨平台骨折疗效的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(23):3767-3772.
[26] HUANG H, HSIEH MF, ZHANG G, et al. Improved accuracy of 3D-printed navigational template during complicated tibial plateau fracture surgery. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015;38:109-117
[27] GIANNETTI S, BIZZOTTO N, STANCATI A, et al. Minimally invasive fixation in tibial plateau fractures using an pre-opera-tive and intra-operative real size 3D printing. Injury. 2017;48(3):784-788.
[28] HUNG CC, LI Y T, CHOU YC, et al. Conventional plate fixation method versus pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing-assisted contoured plate fixation method in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture. Int Orthop. 2019;43(2):425-431.
[29] LOU Y, CAI L, WANG C, et al. Comparison of traditional surgery and surgery assisted by three dimensional printing technology in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures.Int Orthop. 2017;41(9):1875-1880.
[30] SHEN S, WANG P, LI X, et al. Pre-operative simulation using a three-dimensional printing model for surgical treatment of old and complex tibial plateau fractures. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):6044.