Sensitivity and specificity of coronal computed tomography reconstruction and traditional methods for determining screw loosening in spinal internal fixation

doi:10.12307/2022.593

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw loosening is a serious complication of spinal internal fixation, and previous reports on the determination of screw loosening still focused on computed tomography (CT) axial images.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of coronal CT reconstruction using traditional methods, including X-ray and axial CT images, in determining screw loosening.
METHODS: This study enrolled a total of 23 patients who underwent spinal revision surgery in Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, including 17 patients with degenerative diseases and 6 patients with fractures. There were 14 patients with short segmental fixation and 9 patients with long segmental fixation. Coronal CT reconstruction and traditional X-ray and axial CT images were used to determine pedicle screw loosening preoperatively. Two doctors read the film independently without interfering with each other. Preoperative assessment was made for loosening of all fixation devices. A total of 171 screws were detected intraoperatively by digital torsion meter, and whether the screws were loose was determined according to the torsion. The sensitivity and specificity of the two methods were calculated separately. The clinical study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and the relevant ethical requirements of Henan Provincial People’s Hospital. Patients were informed of the treatment and signed an informed consent form.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 171 screws were examined, of which 69 screws were loose, and the loosening rate was 40.1%. The torsion force was (13.9±17.2) Ncm for loose screws and (154.9±72.3) Ncm for unloosened screws. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of coronal CT reconstruction were 76.2%, 89.8%, and 80.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the traditional method were 63.7%, 79.3%, and 69.0%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the coronal CT reconstruction were higher than those of the traditional method (P < 0.05). The intra-observer correlation coefficients of the two methods were both greater than 0.75, indicating a good consistency between the two methods. To conclude, coronal CT reconstruction is simple and convenient, which can improve the accuracy of screw loosening determination after spinal internal fixation.

Key words: computed tomography, coronal reconstruction image, spinal internal fixation, screw loosening, sensitivity, specificity

CLC Number:

Hu Weiran, Song Yuepeng, Shi Xinge, Ma Haohao, Wang Hongqiang, Zhang Kai, Gao Kun, Shao Jia, Gao Yanzheng. Sensitivity and specificity of coronal computed tomography reconstruction and traditional methods for determining screw loosening in spinal internal fixation[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2022, 26(15): 2372-2376.

Figures/Tables 6

References

[1] KIM DH, HWANG RW, LEE GH, et al. Comparing rates of early pedicle screw loosening in posterolateral lumbar fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2020;20(9):1438-1445.
[2] UEHARA M, TAKAHASHI J, IKEGAMI S, et al. Pedicle Screw Loosening After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Upper and Lower Instrumented Vertebrae Having Major Perforation. Spine. 2017;42(24):1895-1900.
[3] PEARSON HB, DOBBS CJ, GRANTHAM E, et al. Intraoperative biomechanics of lumbar pedicle screw loosening following successful arthrodesis. J Orthop Res. 2017; 35(12):2673-2681.
[4] KIM CH, JU CI, LEE SM, et al. Efficacy of Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Augmentation for Correcting Low Grade Pedicle Screw Loosening. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2021; 17(1):41-47.
[5] JARVERS JS, SCHLEIFENBAUM S, PFEIFLE C, et al. Comparison of three different screw trajectories in osteoporotic vertebrae: a biomechanical investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):418.
[6] SPIRIG JM, SUTTER R, GÖTSCHI T, et al. Value of standard radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in detection of intraoperatively confirmed pedicle screw loosening-a prospective clinical trial. Spine J. 2019;19(3):461-468.
[7] ZHANG RJ, LI HM, GAO H, et al. Cortical bone trajectory screws used to save failed traditional trajectory screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine and vice versa: a human cadaveric biomechanical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;1-8.
[8] WOLF H, PAJENDA G, SARAHRUDI K. Analysis of factors predicting success and failure of treatment after type B periprosthetic humeral fractures: a case series study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38(2):177-183.
[9] SHIN SJ, LEE JH, LEE JH. Influence of Hydroxyapatite Stick on Pedicle Screw Fixation in Degenerative Lumbar Spine: Biomechanical and Radiologic Study. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(6):E819-E826.
[10] WU X, SHI J, WU J, et al. Pedicle screw loosening: the value of radiological imagings and the identification of risk factors assessed by extraction torque during screw removal surgery. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):6.
[11] WEISER L, HUBER G, SELLENSCHLOH K, et al. Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(11):2891-2897.
[12] ZOU D, SUN Z, ZHOU S, et al. Hounsfield units value is a better predictor of pedicle screw loosening than the T-score of DXA in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(5):1105-1111.
[13] GUO HZ, TANG YC, GUO DQ, et al. Pedicle Screw Fixation in Single-Level, Double-Level, or Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Fusion for Osteoporotic Spine: A Retrospective Study with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. World Neurosurg. 2020;140:e121-e128.
[14] LENG J, HAN G, ZENG Y, et al. The Effect of Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration on Distal Pedicle Screw Loosening Following Corrective Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis. Spine. 2020;45(9):590-598.
[15] ANAND N, AGRAWAL A, RAVINSKY R, et al. The prevalence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) in patients undergoing circumferential minimally invasive surgical (cMIS) correction for adult spinal deformity: long-term 2- to 13-year follow-up. Spine Deform. 2021;9(5):1433-1441.
[16] GUO HZ, TANG YC, LI YX, et al. The Effect and Safety of Polymethylmethacrylate-Augmented Sacral Pedicle Screws Applied in Osteoporotic Spine with Lumbosacral Degenerative Disease: A 2-Year Follow-up of 25 Patients. World Neurosurg. 2019; 121:e404-e410.
[17] HUDYANA H, MAES A, VANDENBERGHE T, et al. Accuracy of bone SPECT/CT for identifying hardware loosening in patients who underwent lumbar fusion with pedicle screws. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(2):349-354.
[18] KAUR K, GARG A, TRIPATHI M, et al. Comparative contribution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in pre-operative localization for epilepsy surgery: A prospective blinded study. Seizure. 2021;86:181-188.
[19] SAKAI Y, TAKENAKA S, MATSUO Y, et al. Hounsfield unit of screw trajectory as a predictor of pedicle screw loosening after single level lumbar interbody fusion.J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(5):734-738.
[20] GALBUSERA F, VOLKHEIMER D, REITMAIER S, et al. Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur Spine J. 2015;24(5):1005-1016.
[21] CHOY WJ, WALSH WR, PHAN K, et al. Technical Note: Pedicle Cement Augmentation with Proximal Screw Toggle and Loosening. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(3):510-515.
[22] WILKE HJ, GRUNDLER S, OTTARDI C, et al. In vitro analysis of thoracic spinal motion segment flexibility during stepwise reduction of all functional structures.Eur Spine J. 2020;29(1):179-185.
[23] MAI Q, WAN J. Metal Artifacts Reduction in CT Scans using Convolutional Neural Network with Ground Truth Elimination. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020; 2020:1319-1322.